this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
157 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

11937 readers
1232 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There doesn’t need to be a victim but it’s actually fairly dangerous. Crosswalks typically, and maybe by law/code, have signage ahead of the crosswalk to warn drivers.

This could make things more dangerous for pedestrians by giving them false trust that this crosswalk is signed and known to drivers that frequent the route.

I generally approve of this kind of vigilante civil engineering. But, safety should be taken into account so I’m a bit torn.

Either way, it’s civil disobedience which comes with a potential cost. It has worked by drawing more attention to the issue and nobody got hurt. Hopefully, they get off with a slap on the wrist.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] cadekat@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

Life was simpler before 9/11.

Uh, I'm pretty sure you can still buy reflective vests at Home Depot.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

~~It was already a crosswalk, just unmarked. Adding road markings cannot make it less safe.~~

Ugh, I misread the article and thought he marked an unmarked crosswalk because of the article image and the comment I was responding to calling it "this crosswalk".

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

Wait, is it the empty two-line path on the south side of the intersection? If so, that needs better marking anyways.

Just give the guy a list of materials, tools, and relevant safety and installation codes, and let him cook. He's already willing to do the job for you, help him do it right, and also save some taxpayer dollars in the process.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There’s no such thing as an “unmarked crosswalk” in Virginia. Pedestrians can legally cross at “marked crosswalks” and intersections if there are no marked crosswalks.

The difference is that drivers are legally required to stop at marked crosswalks. This is not an “unmarked crosswalk. It’s just an intersection.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It’s just an intersection.

I get that you are referring to legal definitions here, but that’s exactly what an unmarked crosswalk is: an intersection without crosswalk markings. Same thing, different name.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And are drivers not required to yield to pedestrians at intersections? With or without crosswalks...