this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
527 points (98.9% liked)

News

36000 readers
2858 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The unidentified demonstrator allegedly threw rocks at law enforcement and damaged government vehicles, the FBI said.

As tense anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles enter their fourth day, federal officers have ramped up law enforcement’s response – and have added one protester to the FBI’s ‘Most Wanted list.’

The unidentified demonstrator has been accused of assaulting a federal officer and damaging government property during Saturday’s protest in Paramount, a city 30 miles south of Los Angeles.

The suspect allegedly threw rocks at law enforcement on Alondra Boulevard around 3:30 p.m. Saturday, “injuring a federal officer and damaging government vehicles,” according to the FBI’s Los Angeles field office. It was not immediately clear whether the officer was injured or the extent of the damage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 190 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The FBI is asking the public for help identifying a man at the Los Angeles protests against ICE whom the agency has put on its ‘Most Wanted list. ‘ (FBI)

How about you go fuck yourself instead.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 105 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even if they offer a cash reward, Luigi has taught us they won't pay out

You know, for those people lacking a moral compass

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

they won't pay out

They will always have a loophole to keep you from getting yours.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I'm just hoping they didn't bring their phones. Btw, if you go to a protest, don't bring your smartphone.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Throwing rocks, starting fires, and initiating violence? I'd say there's a much better than 50% chance that this is someone who came to instigate violence rather that support the protest. If he's ever arrested, I'd bet money that he turns out to have a pardon from Trump in his history or a ProudBoy tat or both.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Alright..

At least the violence is against the appropriate targets.

[–] onesixone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Stop discrediting ways of protesting you dont like by making sruff up. The outside agitator trope is a counterinsurgency tactic to sow distrust in resistance movements.

This already happened with the George Floyd protests and in the end no proof was ever shown for this being a relevant factor in any meaningful way.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Stop discrediting ways of protesting you dont like by making sruff up. The outside agitator trope is a counterinsurgency tactic to sow distrust in resistance movements.

This already happened with the George Floyd protests and in the end no proof was ever shown for this being a relevant factor in any meaningful way.

Yes, it can be used to sow distrust, and it's also a method that has been regularly used to incite violence so the authorities can respond with escalated violence. As for proof, you mean proof like the white supremacist that police identified as having been started fires and incited violence at otherwise peaceful George Floyd protests? Or this one? Or these guys?

The use of agents provocateur to turn peaceful protests violent is so common that it's practically a tradition at this point.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago

Step 1. Peaceful protest

Step 2. Police start gunning down protestors

Step 3. "Guys dont escalate, the police might start shooting people"

Step 4. Fascism

I think you know what step you are at

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You can't just cherry pick random data points and use those to assert broad claims. How about these guys. Was the Minneapolis precinct burning the action of proud boys?

If anything a majority were the most average of average. If you're gonna keep pushing this narrative at least make sure you get your paycheck from the DHS.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 months ago

You are wrong, people are pissed and are willing to show it. Have you never felt serious about something in your life? He didn't initiate the violence, the raids in his community from masked fascist goon squads started the violence. He is defending the people.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

we can help identify the ICE PIGS instead.