this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

28 readers
1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand that teams in these contracts are paying for future production, not past production. If I’m going to give you like $100M, I’d like to have some past production. Patrick Williams has done some stuff, but like that’s just… if that’s the number, if that ends up being true and the Vassell deal ends up being the comp that his agents go to, that’s a lot of cheese.

Starting about 32 minutes into The Lowe Post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KneelBeforeCube@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I love Pat, but anything north of 100/4 would be madness.

[–] george_costanza1234@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Isn’t 4/100 a horrendous overpay as it is

[–] Adventurous-Mud-8019@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I would say in the current it might be a slight overpay for his on court value, but the defense and somewhat consistent shooting alongside potential upside to get better might raise that number somewhat

[–] Faust86@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

$25m is going to be less than 15% of the luxury tax line next year and only going to go down. So no it really isn't an overpay

[–] Maverick_1991@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

10-15% cap for a guy that's a solid bench piece on a contender isnt great

[–] PJ_Reed93@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He’s still 22. A lot of guys don’t start hitting their stride until the middle of their second contract

[–] BASEDME7O2@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bulls fans have been hyping him up for years as this guy with major potential. He’s just not that good. A bunch of players that got drafted in drafts after his are all ready so much better than him

[–] Mtbnz@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He was the youngest player in the league when he was drafted and he missed almost his entire second year with injury. He's still a huge work in progress. That doesn't mean he's necessarily worth 25m+ a year, but it's not a surprise that guys drafted more recently have better production.

[–] BaullahBaullah87@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly…getting 25 mill a year is kinda insane, and I love the kids game. Realistically it should be more like 15-20 million a year for 4 years imo with the production he has actually shown.

[–] tdizhere@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah he’s definitely worth low 20’s imo. Decent role players are being paid 12-18 and Pat is still really young. 6’7, 42% from 3 and 22 years old is still promising.

[–] BaullahBaullah87@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Disagree but thanks for chiming in

[–] floatersforalgernon@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Like, what is he thinking he deserves: 5/200, $40mil per year? That's almost in cognitive dissonance category. jfc.

[–] iSionLLu@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It says starts with a 2 and isn't 20, so presumably 25-29m/y?

[–] Long_Chance3583@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I read it as 200 as well. Thanks for clarifying

[–] abzftw@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Could just be 2

Lel

[–] ltDoBeLikeThat_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

“Wants big, big money starts with a 2 and isn’t $20”

This implies he’s asking for $200M

[–] orwll@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

No the other guy is right. Starts with a 2 and isn't 20: 25,26,27,28,29.

It's not implying 200 million.

[–] Lil-CBD@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He is not asking for 200 mil. They're talking per year. That's why he referenced 20 per. Which is kind of reasonable, but 24+ isn't.

[–] 3pointshoot3r@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I don't really think 20/y is reasonable for someone with as light a CV as his.

[–] sonicshumanteeth@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

no it doesn’t. it implies he wants somewhere between $21m and $29m / year lol.

[–] YpsitheFlintsider@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that's just assuming the worst. Literally anything between 21 and 29 works for that too

[–] Spike_der_Spiegel@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

context wants to be your friend

[–] Gyshall669@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Further on they say “I don’t know if I want to give him $25M” and they use Vassell as a comp, who is making $27M a year. So yes, they mean it’s anywhere from 21-29M a year.

[–] faithfuljohn@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

So yes, they mean it’s anywhere from 21-29M a year.

at minimum it would have to be north of 25 since him getting $21M is close enough to 20 that it isn't something you make a distinction over. It has to be noticeably different to merit that kind of comment from Lowe.

[–] not-who-you-think@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think he is even eligible to sign for $200M in total

[–] doom32x@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Lol, he thinks he deserves that much more than Devin Vassell, lol.

[–] metroaide@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] CorrectionCreator@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For what? What has dude done?

[–] bullpaw@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Large reason why the Bulls had a top 5 defense last year despite starting Lavine Demar and Vucevic, for one

[–] CorrectionCreator@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I will give you that he does play good defense. But a dude that plays good defense and has a poor offensive game is not a $20 million a year player. Those guys are out there and available

[–] atlfalcons33rb@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Stares in Dillon brooks lmao

[–] OnePointSeven@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

he was also the Bulls best 3pt shooter last year, and we ranked worst for 3pts made

[–] CorrectionCreator@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He still needs to shoot a lot more though

[–] Lysetto@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

By god, that’s Rudy Gobert’s music

[–] Mr89675432@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He's a solid-good option to throw on the other teams best offensive player every night but he was far from carrying our defense. No reason to throw Lavine whose improved massively under the bus for PWill either.

[–] destroyerofpoon93@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

100 would be absurd too. Bro is like the 7th best player on a team that didn’t make the playoffs

[–] LarryBirdsGrundle@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don’t watch the Bulls when they’re not playing the Celts but when they do match up I’ve never seen him do anything slightly impressive.

[–] destroyerofpoon93@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Yup. He’s in the rui hachimura range if I had to guess: 3 yr 51 mill. And even that would be way too rich for my blood.

[–] Sy6574@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

100/4 is still kind of nuts unless he makes a leap this year

[–] LogDogan4@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

100/4 would also be madness.

[–] beefJeRKy-LB@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We're likely to give precious a 4/48 deal. I think 5/100 would be something to give him in your case.

[–] Ok-Philosopher9070@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Nah man $200m/10 years

[–] ThisOneGoes211@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We’re in like our 3rd year of hoping he’ll take the next step on offense and he just feels so reluctant. I agree 100/4 is the very max I’d be willing to spend

[–] rolytron@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

100 years at $40k sounds about right lol