this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
629 points (97.3% liked)

News

31149 readers
3801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sarah Katz, 21, had a heart condition and was not aware of the drink’s caffeine content, which exceeded that of cans of Red Bull and Monster energy drinks combined, according to a legal filing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Orionza@lemmy.world 238 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I hope this lawsuit forces them to remove this. I'm sorry this young girl died. This isn't the first issue they had with this drink. My husband and I were discussing it months ago. He thought it was just lemonade - sugar, water, lemons. We didn't figure out why he was up all night. Later someone old him how much caffeine it has. We had no idea. It's dangerous to those with high bp.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 114 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm not going to lie when I first read the headline I thought this was probably a frivolous lawsuit but after reading the article I thought that stuff should get pulled.

[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 126 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's like that McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit. Poor lady was made a mockery of for ordering hot coffee because it sounds ridiculous at first but she had 2nd degree burns. It was recklessly hot, as was this drink recklessly produced and marketed.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 112 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

3rd degree groin burns that required grafts.

She initially asked for just 20k to cover her medical bills, and they instead offered like $800.

Also of note, that huge 2.7mil fine the jury found? Just the profits from 2 days of McDonald's coffee sales. The judge reduced it to $650k, but even that likely wasent paid as they settled out of court at that point.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It was also discovered that McDonald's was aware of the danger of serving their coffee that hot, yet they continued to do so because it meant they had to give fewer free refills. If you have to wait 20 minutes for your coffee to cool down before you drink it, you're going to get less refills overall

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 20 points 2 years ago

The worst part of that is knowing they probably determined it's cheaper to settle injuries than keep it at the temps they were supposed to. I know corporations are soulless money making machines but that always feels extra dark to think about

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

IIRC their explanation was for take away, keeping the coffee hotter so it would last until you got home.

[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the specific wording in their documentation was because they wanted the smell of the coffee to fill the restaurant. Did McDonald's give refills of coffee?

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They did for seniors at the time

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Funny you should mention that. I use to work for the franchise owner who's brother-in-law (who also worked for the franchise) gave that woman the cup of coffee (or so he would say) when they were franchising with McDonalds. And guess where I was working at the time? Panera

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where are you working now I’m sure this streak isn’t over.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I had to guess based on external evidence, maybe Congress?

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Okay that’s fucking funny.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It also explains why the coffee is so bad. Heating coffee above a certain temp is just burning it.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

It should be brewed at 195-205 F, just a bit higher than McDonalds served it.

But normally it would quickly cool down after it’s brewed. Any burning from reaching that temp is from a hot plate exceeding the temp and burning the bits of oil and soot that are in contact with the plate. Water, and I assume coffee, can’t be heated above boiling at 212 F anyway, but the hot plate and carafe or urn parts can, and steam can, and oil can.

Anyway I’m just saying it would be reasonable for fresh and good-tasting coffee to be in that temperature range. But it’s only going to stay there for any length of time if it’s burned on a hot plate or, more ideally, dripped directly into an insulated container.

It’s more likely their coffee tastes like shit because it was badly roasted, ground months ago, has since gone stale and bitter, and is full of unnecessary added chemicals and preservatives, just like the rest of their shit food.

[–] Elivey@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

If I remember correctly, her labia got fused together... Super fucked up burns.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do a bit of research into the marketing actually used for this drink. Assuming the store uses the standard Panera marketing, there's a big sign on the dispenser saying how much caffeine is in it. It's a tragic mistake, but unless that location uniquely screwed up, that's all it is.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Another commentor said their husband ordered it thinking it was a regular lemonade. The issue could be more wide spread than a single store.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

I noted that. Yet another commentor linked to a vlog where the signs weren't present because the dispensers were behind the counter and had to be ordered. I think there are absolutely locations NOT showing the marketing.

But please check out the other comments here and see the one showing what the dispensers with signs look like. Those are BIG signs with BIG mention of caffeine.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think they're legally liable after what I've read through and personally experienced -- but I absolutely don't think this is a frivolous lawsuit. It's still worth merit when it comes to signage and frankly medical testing.

The biggest problem is that she drank it without knowing the heart condition. We need to have better detection and screening to make sure people know this.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

From the article:

Katz had a heart condition called long QT syndrome type 1 and avoided energy drinks at the recommendation of her doctors, according to the filing.

her roommate and close friend, Victoria Rose Conroy [said,] “She was very, very vigilant about what she needed to do to keep herself safe,” Conroy said. “I guarantee if Sarah had known how much caffeine this was, she never would have touched it with a 10-foot pole.”

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't mind it existing as a product. If it does though it should be very clearly labeled with warnings that are impossible to miss. This seems great for Panaras on college campuses, but there should be no possibility you confuse it for something else.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

More caffeine than two energy drinks combined seems very excessive to me.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So are you suggesting we ban coffee, which typically has more caffeine than this drink?

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What coffee are you drinking that has almost 400mg of caffeine in it? Most have around 100mg.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Most light- to medium-roasts approach 150mg/250mL. The one I'm baselining is Dunkin Donuts, the most popular coffee in the US. A standard Large Iced has almost 400mg of caffeine. You can order it with a shot of espresso, if you like.

We have to remember that the drink she was consuming (multiple times) was a 30oz. There are very few coffees with less than 350-400mg of caffeine in a 24oz size (or smaller)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I also wasn’t aware. I imagine there were signs, but who looks for the caffeine content of lemonade? In my case I just had a dash t flavor soda, so I didn’t notice until my kid pointed it out

Similarly, when my kids were little, I kept them away from stimulants, but who expects to have to prohibit lemonade for the caffeine hit?

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why didn't you read the very clear, explicit label?

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What very clear, explicit label?

The Charged Lemonade was “offered side-by-side with all of Panera’s non-caffeinated and/or less caffeinated drinks” and was advertised as a “plant-based and clean” beverage that contained as much caffeine as the restaurant’s dark roast coffee, according to photos of both the menu and beverage dispensers in the store, which were included in the wrongful death lawsuit.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

"Plant based and clean with as much caffeine as our dark roast coffee." is the full quote. Then, it lists the specific amount of caffeine for the two sizes.

You can argue it should have a more eye-catching and cautionary presentation, but it's disingenuous to say it wasn't clear and explicit.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Forget the article; go to an actual Panera. The amount of caffeine is clearly labeled right under the name of the drink. To be fair, their drinks contain way too much, but you can't say that they don't already make the label clear and easy to interpret. People are idiots who don't read the label beyond the "lemonade" part.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I don't think it's "way too much". A large of those every morning is still under the "healthy" FDA recommendations, wherein there are zero known negative side-effects for most people.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

contained as much caffeine as the restaurant’s dark roast coffee

That part. Though I don't think people realize how much caffeine is in their dark roast coffee. Because it is more caffeine than multiple energy drinks for the same volume. There's a reason a standard cup of coffee is like 6 oz instead of 20 oz.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It also includes the caffeine "dosage" in grams for those who want/need to know. That inclusion is more prominent than the description he's quoting.

Flip-side, you can't get a 6oz coffee in most of the US. The most popular coffee around me is generally sold between 20oz and 30oz sizes.