this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
329 points (97.4% liked)
Not The Onion
18279 readers
774 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is illegal unless he dies
If he does… I’ll happily approve of this coin.
Maybe but they do illegal things all the time and no one is a position to stop them does anything
Okay so we should all just give up then? Act like laws don't exist? Just let him?
Yeah. I’m sure it being illegal will stop this.
Oh! Then I support this coin!
Yeah honestly at this point I want to see more unhinged shit so we can laugh at the history books.
I'm not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn't seem to break any laws.
I'm assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.
The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.
If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can't be a 'portrait'.
So this isn't really slam dunk illegal, but I don't think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.
(aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—
(1)Prohibition on certain representations.—
No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).
I don't know much about the law, but it feels like the 'Fight fight fight' side is overtly party political.
So is him running for a third term, but his office is filled with “Trump 2028” hats.
Since when during this admin was legality considered?
Just because some part of the U.S. government ignored the law doesn't mean the entire U.S. government ignores the law.
Are you sure about that?
Only after he's been dead for 2 years or more can his visage be printed on a U.S. coin.
How do we know he hasn’t been Grok in a wig this whole time?
They may be expecting that.