this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
197 points (95.0% liked)

Not The Onion

20229 readers
1093 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I voted for her in 24 and I was glad to. I'm sorry she lost. But I don't think it's wise she run for President again in 28. Governor of California? Great. Let California decide. But the stakes are too high for the Presidency.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If we had a fair primary process, one where funding/media coverage wasn't deliberately skewed like in 2016, I wouldn't mind her running. I need to fact check myself on the details here, though — can't remember if it was media coverage and funding or just media coverage in particular biasing Clinton

Ninja edit: ok there was some fuckery for sure, but I didn't realize the votes were so heavily favoring Clinton. Either way, that's what primaries are for. I'd rather have Harris over Newsome, personally