this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
156 points (94.3% liked)
Not The Onion
20218 readers
3012 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Mobilize the youth to support genocide?
gen Z
the 6-7 meme slop.
Is like when oled people don't realize they're milennial.
Gen Z are who we are in our 20's or like 17 at the minimum, Gen A is whom you call kids.
Glad I'm not from the US so i don't have to cringe over this lol.
I'm fucking embarrassed and I'm not even gen z.
Brat summer y'all!!
This is so cringe it hurts. And I'm Gen-X.
Of course I despise this whole pointless 67 thing so maybe it will kill it.
At least my generation's pointless fascination with numbers actually related to something.
Finally now when people say "6 7" I can ask if they're talking about this thinktank bullshit
Thank you Kamala for finally killing this whole 6 7 thing.
Fuck off Kamala.
This is a "Pokémon go to the polls," vibe. Not a compliment.
Damn, I guess that's how the Dems will manage to lose their electoral goodwill.
She can't even tell the difference between Gen Z and Gen Alpha.
Good thing is, this bullshit of hers may kill 67 hype for good.
These trends only last 6-7 months anyway.
I'm not sure I can tell the difference between Gen z and Gen alpha, the lines are pretty blurry with these "generations".
Easy.
Gen Z folks are in their 20s. They're either in college or already in the workforce.
Gen Alpha folks are still in grade school.
Lemme ask you this: have you ever seen a college kid making that 67 reference?
Poochie is rad to the max.
I voted for her in 24 and I was glad to. I'm sorry she lost. But I don't think it's wise she run for President again in 28. Governor of California? Great. Let California decide. But the stakes are too high for the Presidency.
If we had a fair primary process, one where funding/media coverage wasn't deliberately skewed like in 2016, I wouldn't mind her running. I need to fact check myself on the details here, though — can't remember if it was media coverage and funding or just media coverage in particular biasing Clinton
Ninja edit: ok there was some fuckery for sure, but I didn't realize the votes were so heavily favoring Clinton. Either way, that's what primaries are for. I'd rather have Harris over Newsome, personally
Yeah, these dumbasses still haven’t realized that they can’t do this shit themselves. Someone should tell them they have to pay other people to do it while pretending they’re not affiliated.
O_O
How... Fucking... out of touch... Could you get...
Go away. You are part of the problem. Both you and Gavin can go fuck right off.
She's not nearly as bad as Gavin.
Her and Biden's admin was full of LGBT Cabinet members and they protected gah marriage.
I'm pushing towards 50 and this feels cringe to me. So logically this should be the coolest thing ever for the kids, right?
I liked it a lot more when she was shutting the fuck up
Prepare yourself for three more years of this crap until she loses again.
"Pokemon go to the polls"
"Let's YEET out the republicans"
That one I’m ok with.
I was going to add this, and also "Why does she look like Lucielle Bluth?"
Because 'Headquarters 69' would be too cringe, fr fr no cap.
Shut your stupid face and crawl back into your AIPAC hole, you worthless piece of corporate Democratic trash.
Her Newsome and buttigege are all literally the same POS corporate democrat. A DINO
Newsome and Pritzker had their chance in 2024 and declined to take the nomination, there for the taking.
What is wrong with the party, we have zero challenges? Only token challenges for president by an old leftist, that still almost wins. No challenges for house or senate. Then 2024 not a single challenge for the top spot, 4 plus months to go, proposed anointee the most unpopular person possible, that never breached 30% approval for a deeply unpopular administration at 40% approval for 3 years.
Then didn't see fit to offer any reform running as that deeply unpopular status quo. No health care, no drugs, no calling out business interests openly cheating us. Broad empty platitudes, we aren't the republicans.
Everyone in the party needs to be replaced with maybe a few exceptions. They were chosen to be weak, chosen because the donors fear someone taking back the license they've corruptly garnered through captured government, fear a populist government would modestly impair their record profits from their companies.
I’m going to pokémon go to headquarters six seven and do the harlem shake
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gen Z? I though this was more of a Gen alpha thing
6️⃣🤷♂️7️⃣
the same thing happened to millennials. they got blamed for being stupid teenagers when they were in their mid twenties. it seems it takes about a generation for the old folks to catch up what's the new word for the youths nowadays, by then it's often barely accurate anymore
The generational concept is also a bit weird, like if huge waves of children would be born every 10 years lol
Well, there was after WWII. And a smaller wave when boomers came of age. Though boomers have been trying to shoehorn us into generational boxes ever since.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Alright, so 6 7 is officially uncool.
My primary schooler is already tired of it and has moved on. I patiently await the next silly fad
load more comments
(1 replies)
Oh my god fuck all the way off, Harris. You’re bad at this. You’re not the leader we need, now or ever.
She'll do
Purity Tests are cringe af
Let her organize grassroots so you can complain about whatever the lawn produces because the alternative is an oil spill.
No.
She was one of the central players that lost the Republic. I don’t ever want to see her fucking face again in politics.
She was a bad candidate in 2016 and 2020, and she was demonstrably a catastrophic choice in 2024. And by that I mean her lack of backbone in standing up to monied interests shows that she entirely lacks the grit and will that our current era demands. Too much compromise with the neoliberals and hypercapitalists, not enough listening to actually fucking citizens and lived experience. Walz was the brightest spot in her campaign. And then she and the DNC muzzled him, with predictable results.
There are no "good candidates", the central players that defeated the Republic are the collaborative efforts of a group of billionaires and foreign dictatorships turning social media against democracy. Any progressive candidate will face the same uphill battle and the nation will slide further into conservative autocracy unless we do something to stop it.
view more: next ›