this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
554 points (98.8% liked)

science

26685 readers
620 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So the substance isn't a possible treatment for cancer because of neurological side effects... and their next step is "let's sell it to guys who aren't able to use condoms"?

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

I think the idea is that this particular drug isn't suitable as birth control, but having identified that this mechanism/biological pathway can work for birth control, they can look for a less toxic compound to achieve the same effect.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

sounds that way to me. I think the thing like always is the title. its something they noticed and now a track to find something that does a similar type of mechanism without the bad side effects.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

If I read it correctly it's double win for guys who have cancer and don't want to reproduce.