this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
871 points (98.9% liked)

News

37401 readers
2233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'm far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can't earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn't matter the amount the wage is, if it isn't also tied to inflation as we'll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn't. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it's not just theater.

Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The real money is made on assets, not income

[–] jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

there will never be a wage cap under this current neoliberal hellscape. the entire goal of both parties is to make money for their corporate interests

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They just get non-salary benefits

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's where the cap needs to be. There will always be someone capable and willing to take the job without the enormous pay packet. Executive pay is the biggest scam ever created.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No but you see if we don't offer 2 million a year AT LEAST we won't attract too talent!

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It’s such a wild lie that for some reason we are all supposed to take seriously.

We all work at companies, the executives aren’t doing anything earth shattering. Most executives seem to be running the playbook of “give the customer less and charge them more to increase profits”. Wow, what innovation!

I would love for someone to be able to point out some concrete brilliant ideas that an executive actually had that went from “vague bullshit” to execution without getting worked and reworked and reworked by a bunch of normal employees until it was actually viable.

Steve Jobs made the iPhone, oh by himself, did he design the chips and write the software? Sure the vision is great, but for every iPhone there are a thousand CEOs that basically keep the lights on an already functioning company and raise the price. Oversee a rebrand. Go on the news and talk up their company.

And they’d have you believe that that’s worth 300-400x what a regular employee.

That every day they are coming in and providing more benefit than a worker does in an entire year. It’s the most obvious bullshit we’ve ever been asked to swallow

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a value tied to the non-salary benefits. Include that in the cap.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something something unrealized gains. I agree with you, I'm just pessimistic we'll ever see anything remotely close to this.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

I'm with you on that. It will not happen

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't even hold my breath for 1000x

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

the "the 1%" meme is really anti-class consciousness, rich workers are workers, this individual literally forgot investors exist