this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
872 points (99.0% liked)

News

37401 readers
1957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

They had the presidency and did nothing.

But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Of course.

Can't do anything, but gotta look like you're doing something so they can use it for fodder in the next election

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

This is just so some Democrats can claim "supported/worked for higher worker wages" during their next reelection campaign.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Imagine begging for crumbs of your own labour from the bourgeosie imperialist democratic party

[–] E_coli42@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that's adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn't be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago

How stupid do they think we are? Oh wait, I regularly talk to people who fall for these stunts

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago

most of them are gop that are not electable as a republican, so they become DINOS. schumer +13 other senators are likely the same, likewise with the house seats.

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just that but if it passed it would eat into profits. We can’t have that, think of the shareholders

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Profits are already eaten up by executive bonuses and salaries.

It's regular salaries that eat into those, and that's what they're trying to protect.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Introduce a bill for Socialized Healthcare too!!!

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I'm far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can't earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn't matter the amount the wage is, if it isn't also tied to inflation as we'll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn't. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it's not just theater.

Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The real money is made on assets, not income

[–] jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

there will never be a wage cap under this current neoliberal hellscape. the entire goal of both parties is to make money for their corporate interests

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Dozen of workplace burn by the workers -> even shithead thinks to raise wages

Direct action pay cash

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Was this comment written by Kevin from The Office when he wouldn't use full sentences?

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

How can anyone survive on ~$7.80/hr? That is modern day indentured slavery.

[–] atoro@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this to not go anywhere and have several dems finger-wag for the next several years saying there's nothing they can do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It should be at least $20/hr

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bill is for $25. No way it'll actually happen tho even though we desperately need it

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

yeah, this bill has the same chance of passing as it snowing in hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago

in HCOL states is around that or slightly more or ready. it wont get passed because the gop isnt going to allow it since none of them support it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they're not in power.

When they're in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema's thumbs down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This may be for show but that's more show than they were willing to show 2019-2021. Republicans were throwing out certain to fail bills constantly for at least the last 25 years. It at least throws people a marketing bone and also any that make it out of committee to a floor vote, it puts on record/something to market for/against an elected public servant. Republicans effectively steer public opinion against their own to their advantage for getting stuff passed and who they want into office. Democrats do not.

It's one way to craft a publicly recognizable party ideology that the democratic party has failed to build up these last few decades. The we're not republicans, we looks and sound more professional doesn't work. Something like this is a major improvement. If it makes it to the floor for a vote, which democrats and republicans will vote against or abstain. We should want that for potential future primary challengers and be encouraging these

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

No it is not. Democrats did plenty of performative theater in the past. They even have a rotating villain cast which will always make sure there are just enough Democrat votes "betraying" the party to make Republican legislation pass.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

its performative, the gop isnt on board with this and likely they will block it. dnc has alot of bad publicity recently, israel/gaza, inaction trump, plus ending shut downs early,,,etc.

THE gop has largely convinced thier own base that higher wages =higher prices.

they get more good publicity by raising the MEDICAID/care income cap, where you have a max income on which you can receive " recieve free healthcare" or reapplying the covid-area susidies to the ACA.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And it's still too low for anybody to live off of.

https://livingwage.mit.edu/

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It would double my wages. Anything is better than nothing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn't it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it's obviously rejected.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's a pretend attempt lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 191 points 2 days ago (18 children)

And pin it to an inflation index maybe?

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 142 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Pin it to congressional compensation.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (18 children)

They can't pass it. They don't have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would've been actual policy, and they don't want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

"We can't pass it. We don't have supermajority."

They get supermajority.

"We can't pass it. We don't have the presidency"

They win presidential elections.

"We can't just pass it. It has to be bipartisan or it's bad for democracy"

They lose midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›