Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
The terminally online debate-me-bro brand of atheism.
It's always been curious to me that you can define yourself by something that your not. I'm also vexed why an atheist would proselytize. They're not saving souls or capturing 10%. What's the motivation? And please don't say it's because atheists are better people. Because all the famous "new" atheists were regular cast members on Epstein Island and the whole movement had deep ties to the alt-right and Gamergate.
I'm not saying they're wrong, I'm saying they're obnoxious, belligerent, and annoying. To be clear, I'm atheist. That's half the problem. These MFers are making me look bad.
Not a fan of fedora atheism either, but imo when atheists proselytize it’s because organized religion is harmful and they’re trying to limit/remove its power
That's what they always claim, but 9 outta 10 times I see an atheist on this website it's because someone said "oh God, that's crazy" and they had to reply with "🤓😏 more like oh Flying Spaghetti Monster that's crazy. Haha! Get it? Cuz God doesn't exist!!?"
I mean trying to make religious phrases awkward and less used kinda is a way to limit/remove organized religion’s power lol. We normalize it with our language, and if we stopped I think it would make it harder for religious talk to come across as serious. Not saying it’s not annoying - I personally find it a little cringe to police someone else’s language like that even if I do it to myself - but I see the idea behind what they’re doing
Your argument would hold more water if organized religions encouraged people to say things like "oh my God". Saying those phrases or otherwise taking the Lord's name in vain is generally frowned upon, at least in most western religions (no idea if this taboo exists for, say, Hinduism).
You're right in saying we don't think about it when using it in everyday language. Similarly, most westerners aren't thinking they're celebrating the birth of Jesus when they are doing their Christmas shopping; obviously the holiday is inherently religious, but the only groups that generally view it as strictly a Christian holiday are devout followers of another faith that forbids them from celebrating, and obnoxious atheists.
When you encourage people to stop saying "oh my God", you aren't sticking it to organized religion in any way; you're literally policing people to do the same thing they want them to do.
Or maybe what they claim is what they actually mean and they just think you’re annoying so don’t bother investing in having a conversation with you about it?
because they are people. and people want other people to agree with them to validate them. it feels good.
that's just how human beings are wired. human beings generally, don't enjoy being around people who don't agree with and validate them, they find that painful.
this is why people love echo chambers where they rant to each other about how anyone else who doesn't believe what they believe is stupid and bad, and they are very smart and good.
and really, that's how our 'communities' work fundamentally as well. you get together with like-minded people, you create a shared belief system, and you shit on everyone else who doesn't share in that belief system as a bad and wrong as a social bonding exercise.
also why they tend to fly into a rage when confronted with people who are different than them or say things they don't agree with, because they find that painful and they want to punish you for you making them feel bad.