this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
149 points (84.0% liked)

People Twitter

10057 readers
1470 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What I know about South Park:

  • Its creators are libertarians
  • There's an episode which may have promoted climate change denialism
  • The show may have also contributed to 'both sides same' idiocy

Doesn't seem like my cup of tea tbh.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not encouraging you to watch it, but this...

The show may have also contributed to 'both sides same' idiocy

Is kind of hilarious. I'm going to assume this is because of douche vs turd (aired 2004). It does mock both parties, but do you honestly think that the democrats never put out a bad candidate? Do you even remember who ran for dems in 2004 without looking it up? Don't you think it's an actual problem that most of the time a lot of people don't actually like the candidates?

There is a deep problem in American politics, so a comedy show makes fun of it. And you turn around and blame the show for causing the problem. To be honest it is absolutely no surprise that your country is going to shit.

And just to clarify:

When Obama won, most adult characters that people like were celebrating for days. Like continuously.

When Trump ran the first time, they mocked him by replacing him with an awful existing character who ran on the platform of literally fucking all immigrants to death and had no idea what he was doing. Hilary was just... kind of shit. It's incredibly obvious: one is awful, the other is uninspiring. Like real life where she actually managed to lose.

And in the most recent season they went harder against Trump than they ever have about a politician. He spent most of it cheating on his wife with literal Satan and trying to abort the baby with the help of Peter Theil.

In contrast, they didn't even mock Biden as far as I recall?

Sorry to say you've been misled by someone who has another reason to dislike the show (or more likely, who also hasn't watched the show)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, trump did lose the popular vote by 2% his first term. He also said he cheated the second time, I believe him.

Lol but only winning the popular vote by 2% against a patently idiotic, unqualified pedophile and rapist seems like a disaster on its own.

Since when was believing him a good idea? I think without some substantial evidence, the 2024 election deniers are just like the 2020 election deniers. We should absolutely look into it. But no evidence is no evidence any way you cut it.

Everyone points out that Kamala got no votes in a specific (NY?) county but it's a religious community that is basically told how to vote by religious leaders. This is only from memory so feel free to correct/provide further evidence

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago

Sure, but, if I recall, Gore was mocked for being afraid of man-bear-pig, their stand-in for Climate Change, but later man-bear-pig showed up started killing people, which is the show's mea culpa.

Two of the hallmarks of both sides media is they never admit they were wrong and they invariably serve their power structure while pretending to be independent thinkers. Examples of this are the entire foreign policy establishment that cheerled the obviously disastrous Iraq war (while anyone against the obviously disastrous Iraq war was drummed out for not being serious), and Ezra Klein's recent turnaround on Israel due to "new facts" from 60 years ago that he just learned (coinciding with a massive drop in Israel's popularity and masterminding an obviously disastrous Iran war).

South Park admits they were wrong and they absolutely go up against power structures, so I throwing them in the "both sides" propaganda apparatus bucket is just wrong.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't need to politically agree with every joke you enjoy

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

You don't know very much, then. You have no idea if it's your cup of tea... And that's OK too, lotsa media out there. Can't watch it all.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow, an outdated oversimplification and two "may haves" to sum up a show with almost 340 episodes (plus 2 full, plot-heavy video games and a feature film) over the last 3 decades.

Seems like your 'cup of tea' would be better described as a Dixie cup of lukewarm tap water with a single, uncut lemon seed. All those other flavors like Chai, Oolong, or Earl Grey? Nah, those are WAYYY too spicy and scawy! Heaven forbid you go out and ask an actual fan--or Hell, anyone who's seen even one episode--instead of lightly skimming the Controversies section of their Wikipedia page

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That was in the past though, they've changed tune since then.

In other words: Made lotta money -> went to the libertarian right -> got into hot water because they ofended rightwing nuts -> one step back to the left.

Edit: To those that downvote me, I am not one of the creators of South Park, wtf.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

Cha cha real smooth

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, the real hallmark of principled ideals 🙄

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are allowed to change their minds

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Edit: I thought I was in a thread about Graham Platner... So imagine we are when reading this lol

Sure, and if the thing they're changing their minds from is fucking Nazism, then I have a very hard time supporting their political aspirations.

Yeah, people can think/say/do stupid shit when they're young. Though let's be clear that there are levels to this, and we're talking about someone who was at Abu Ghraib and worked for Blackwater. This isn't just like a kid who got radicalized by gamer gate or something, who has grown out of it. This guy killed many people (and is on record saying that he was very ok with that).

A person can think/say/do stupid shit when young, and if they decide to run for office, I reserve the right to not only judge them, but refuse to ever support them.

To me, it's just not worth the risk.