this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
381 points (98.2% liked)

News

37883 readers
1831 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 126 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's almost like if you don't regulate giant corporations they'll do whatever the fuck they want

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

And the one thing they want is to maximize profits. It's not that they want rivers and lakes to be polluted, it's that not polluting rivers and lakes costs more money than polluting rivers and lakes. And if the fines aren't higher than the difference, then they'll just keep doing it and pay their subscription fee.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Polluting natural resources is a violent crime against all of humanity. It should not be a fine.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jail Time, significant jail time is what should result from these actions.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Corporations are people, last I heard. Sounds like board members and executives should split prison time between them based on percentage of culpability.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

RepubliQans laugh

100% agree, however it is also important to keep in mind the many other decisions made by corporations explicitly to cause pain at the cost of less profit.

In capitalist society, cruelty is the point. Happy workers are proven to be more productive and care more about the company’s well being.

The whole return to office debacle proves executives care more about power and abuse than profit.

In conclusion, corporations are people and that means their executive boards should be sentenced to [this comment was removed by Lemmy].

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Externality: Noun - Capitalist term for "I already got your fucking money, so my mess is your problem you fucking sucker peasants 🖕🤑💰"

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

They'll even do things like paying off regulators so that they repeal laws that limit profit

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Just let them pollute until everyone is dead, then the marker will force them to stop! - Libertarian Morons

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"What an absolute disgrace! We must not allow this travesty to continue!

The Union of Concerned Scientists must be punished, in order to protect our beloved economy and the quarterly earnings of private shareholder portfolio staples like Tyson foods/TSN!"

-Neoliberals to fascists, probably

But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders!

[–] stangel@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You think it's liberals who would want to punish scientists for pointing out corporate greed?

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm thinking you don't know the definition of "neoliberal."

[–] stangel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah that's fair, I inadvertently glossed over the "neo". Still though, punishing scientists for getting in the way of corporate profit seems way more on-brand for modern American conservatives than any other ideology.

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It's not binary, but I agree with your general sentiment.

However, the American citizen has been propagandized and groomed to be corporate bootlickers. To our own demise, we accept the gross negligence of both parties to create reasonable regulation to maintain the balance needed for capitalism to function fairly.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

NEOliberals absolutely would. I'm not accusing the minority within the majority members like Sanders or Ocasio-Cortez of such things.

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

Both parties literally put blinders on for places like Saudi Arabia because they're good customers for our military industrial complex.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago

I live down wind of a Tyson pork plant that recently was announced to be shutting down. Our town is collectively pretty sad for all the people losing their jobs, but NO ONE will miss the plant itself. It smelled AWFUL.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Looks like McDonald’s is double boycotted now.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bought their frozen hot wings by mistake and it was awful. I was looking for the Costco wings with the pouch, but I was in BJs and got them mixed up. Don't get the tyson hot wings. Also Tyson workers were treated really badly during the pandemic and before that their workers wore diapers so they didn't have to go to the bathroom.