this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
208 points (97.3% liked)

News

23287 readers
4476 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The 35-year-old Bank of America (BAC.N) investment banker who died from a blood clot earlier this month wanted to leave the U.S. bank because he was working more than 100 hours a week, according to an executive recruiter who spoke with him about seeking a new job.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 72 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Nothing more American than working an "employee" to death

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Yeah, this feels like the system working as intended.

Time to destroy the system.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

In America we give them lungs full of asbestos and veins full of toxic metals. 100 hour weeks leading to stress death is really more of an asian tradition.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago (4 children)

100? Wtf?! How is that even legal?

[–] greenfish@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'EXEMPT'. there's no cap on salaried employees

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is a cap on salaried employees but the cap is focused on contiguous hours worked and, AFAICT, no managers have ever been held responsible for not noticing people are working that many hours - the cap is usually enforced by workers saying "Fuck you I'm going home to eat and sleep" and being immune from retribution (not from the fuck you part though).

There are also a lot of laws around workplace safety that may kick in - I worked at a game studio and our boss started paying for cabs home after 7 PM after someone complained about our neighborhood getting noticeably less safe after the dinner rush for restaurants ended. They did that voluntarily but a labor lawyer I'd spoken to after speaking with my coworker said we'd likely be able to legally compell them.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the cap is usually enforced by workers saying "Fuck you I'm going home to eat and sleep" and being immune from retribution (not from the fuck you part though).

In most of the United States this is partially true: your fixed salary cannot be docked for failing to work overtime, but you can absolutely be terminated for this reason, or any other reason, or no reason at all.

You can also be offered a new job at a lower fixed salary going forward. But the fixed salary cannot be changed for periods that have already been worked.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

[...] but you can absolutely be terminated for this reason, or any other reason, or no reason at all.

Even in at-will employment states this is untrue... or, rather, you can be fired for any reason but it won't be without recourse. If you're not given a reason for dismissal but that dismissal happens right after you request FMLA leave, or announce you're pregnant, or request reasonable accommodations for a disability, or head home after an unsafe amount of working hours... yea, your employer can fire you but it's likely you can sue them. With all things lawyer it depends on specifics. But non-shitty labor lawyers work on commission and should be willing to review your case for viability for free.

If you were fired for an illegal reason, you probably have a better case than you think.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 7 points 6 months ago

Salary. It's how they enslave you.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Been there, done that. Salaried workers have no limit on how much they can be required to work without additional pay.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've always treated salary as basically the idea that I should average about 40 hours of work a week, but that I get to determine if I need to work 80 one week and then 20 for two or whatever. When it's time to grind, I grind, and then I pull back on my hours. I don't ask for permission, I simply manage my own time.

I've been fairly fortunate it seems. I got called in once for not showing up to work for four days. I explained I did six hours of remote work during those four days related to staff questions and projects, but that I had worked seven straight 12-hour days the week before. I was then told how much the person I was talking to works, and I said they should probably take some time as well, and I ended the meeting.

As far as I'm concerned, having a salary means you don't have to pay someone to make sure I'm getting my work done. I manage my own tasks, I manage my staff, and I manage my hours. If they have a problem with that, they can take a flying fuck at a rolling donut, and I will go elsewhere to work.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Many years ago I worked at a small community bank. Was one of the better jobs I've had. Then a large regional bank purchased it, and overnight it became the worst job I've ever had.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seriously though? That's 7 14 hour days...

[–] norbert@kbin.social 26 points 6 months ago

14hr days still leaves him 8hrs for sleep and 2hrs for eating/excreting/hygiene what's the problem.

He's a wonderful value for the shareholders.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

That averages to over 14 hours a day

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It is disappointing to me that these hours are legal, but this guy was an analyst at a major financial institution.

Mandatory overtime wouldn't surprise me at all, it is fairly common and something I am subjected to as well. But I can almost guarantee nobody else forced him into 100 hour weeks.