this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
1133 points (88.4% liked)

Political Humor

3293 readers
1 users here now

Post politically charged comedy here, but be respectful!

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 118 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Genocide experts? How many Genocides did they commit to get that title.

[–] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 71 points 4 months ago

South Africa really supports protecting the Palestinians from this genocide so at least 1

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago

I read that as historians

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 60 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Look, the point is that you can't believe the thousands of videos of Israel geocoding people. And you can't believe the dozens (or more) videos of them saying it on their local television talkshows. It's simply too complicated, you fucking nitwits. Now tow the party line; we have a genocide to help them complete.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

FYI, it's "toe" the line, as in you put your toe on the line when you fall in order. It's a nautical term, since crews would line up on specific boards on the deck of a ship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Strocker89@beehaw.org 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Western Conservatives: They are commiting genocide 👍👍💯❤️😁

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 56 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I haven't heard any liberals trying to "both sides" the issue. I have heard Republicans expressing their support for the genocide though.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You didn’t hear the US state dept repeatedly claiming “Israel has a right to defend itself” for 6 straight months after the Hamas attack? They still won’t let corpo media use the term genocide, some high profile reporters have even resigned over it.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Corrupt govt actions does not equal how everyday liberals feel. Come on.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You haven't been to Lemmy.world then, lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] highalectical@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 4 months ago

My brother in Christ, our president is literally Joedolf "if there wasn't an Israel, we would have to invent an Israel to secure our interests in the region" Bidler.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

It's likely that the use of "Western Liberals" here is meant to include both major US political parties.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 41 points 4 months ago (15 children)

I mean, it is a complex issue, and there are two sides of it. One of the sides is doing a genocide. The other side makes attacks when they can, killing much smaller numbers. If suddenly the power balance switched, I'm not convinced Hamas wouldn't go for doing a genocide.

What actually matters here is that nobody should be doing genocides, both sides have reason to say, "they started it!", and it's not going to end until both sides can accept that yes, shit happened, bad things were intentionally done by people, and everyone needs to move on, or there will be another round, and another, and another, and another...

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 30 points 4 months ago (11 children)

I get and agree with the spirit but "western liberals" doesn't mean anything

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hear Americans use the term liberal all the time but the way they use it makes me think we're talkibg about different things

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 4 months ago

A liberal is someone who:

  1. Upholds the modern nation state and is thus against monarchy (against whom the first liberals rebelled against)
  2. Upholds capitalism and market economies, and with it property rights
  3. Upholds electoral parliamentary systems of governance
  4. Usually believes in some version of the social contract or similar theory from which the legitimacy of the nation state and capitalism is derived.

Anyone from the left complaining about liberals is using this definition of liberals (typically). The basic reasoning for using this definition if liberal is that it has always been the definition of liberal and has only changed recently in some parts of the world. It is also not necessary to change the definition because the "progressive liberals" also mostly fit the old definition either way. Pretty much every serious socialist political theory will start with a criticism of the philosophy of liberalism.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

this is stupid, because it can be (and probably often is) both, a genocide and a complex issue. acknowledging the complexity of a situation that grew 80 years into this doesn't mean you swipe an ongoing genocide under the rug or have to be complicit.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 46 points 4 months ago (36 children)

The simple issue is that this is genocide. Full stop.

And we should stop it. After that, let's look into the complex issue you're trying to raise. Conflating the two is how people justify doing nothing.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 months ago

There's a difference between being a genocide and a complex issue, and using that it's a complex issue to justify/overlook a genocide

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

"We understand this is a hard one to swallow, but the ~~Mossad handlers~~ AIPAC lobbyists told us that the Palestinians all spontaneously killed themselves after blowing up their homes. On the one hand, that's obviously bullshit. But on the other, they give us SO MUCH MONEY."

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

There are two sides. One side supports genocide, the other side does not. It's pretty clear tbh

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 months ago (14 children)

Except "western liberals" are the ones out there protesting the genocide?

What even the fuck is this post?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Western progressives and leftists are protesting, liberals by definition support current structures and systems to achieve populist goals, but humanitarian causes are not on their radar usually unless it's the most milquetoast issue that everyone can agree on.

As others have said here, the names of things have changed a lot, and this is made more confusing by the fact that a large portion of the population has no idea how this shift has taken place, and conservatives still refer to their hated enemy as "libs" because they're not very bright and names stick. It does throw them for a loop when you say "I'm not a liberal, I'm a leftist/progressive" and it's a good way to remind them how dumb they really are.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Can't believe I'm posting in a Palestine thread again but here we go. I think people aren't using the same words in the same way in this thread. In the last decade there has been a shift in how the word liberal is used. Two decades ago there were the neo-liberals, which said they were not big C conservative but were.

To separate themselves from the neo-liberals, liberals started calling themselves leftist. Which meant the neo-liberals as the only "liberals" remaining. So now the word liberal can mean a person on the left, or a person on the right, depending on the intent of the speaker.

So saying that the liberals are turning a blind eye to genocide is true, the speaker probably just means neo-liberals but ommitted the neo. Language is fluid, and confusing

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

No, leftists are protesting the genocide. Liberals aren’t leftists.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] KeepFlying@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Long term political stability in the region might be complex. Opposing genocide shouldn't be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Source for all those people saying that?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

Complex, maybe?

Two sides? Sure. There are the people getting killed by genocide, and the side committing genocide.

So they might be half right?

[–] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is not political humor, it's not funny, it's reposted here to cause arguments and nothing else. Not very nuanced at all.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

I find it funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›