this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
616 points (97.7% liked)

News

38230 readers
1982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 131 points 2 years ago (4 children)

From the article ...

“Without these standards of decency and morality, this planet may rapidly descend into anarchy, never-ending wars, and barbarism.”

AKA, "the center will not hold".

I want to live in the alternate timeline, with President Sanders.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 83 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sanders is doing right now, exactly the right thing. Its the thing Biden should be doing but is seemingly incapable of. Its being on the right side of history as history is happening and not accepting some fatalistic inevitability about the future.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

not accepting some fatalistic inevitability about the future.

He is describing an inevitability; Socialism or Barbarism.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Considering what's happening around us currently, I've started believing that it's actually barbarism until socialism.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Heard on the news today that Biden said that it is not genocide in Gaza. He really wants to lose I guess.

I voted, donated, and knocked on doors for Sanders. He should be our president not the fucking lesser evil Biden.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Oh man. If the TV news said its not a genocide, it must not be! Right?

Bidens a fucking disgrace.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm still going to vote for Biden. He is wrong on the Gaza situation, though has made strides elsewhere.

Unfortunately it is also either him or possibly THE Idiot Savant. Would prefer ol' Bernie, even today.

Literally today.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I voted for Biden once I will do again to keep Trump out. But after that I am done. Either progressive take control of the party by 2028 our this country can burn for all I care. Done with this bullshit.

Wake me up when we are ready to riot.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Honestly? I agree. Biden will give us a few years to get our shit together. Though I hope there will be people who are able to pull others together for that exact reason.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

He’d be rounding out his second term right now. He was clearly up to the task. I hope he remains in the Senate until he passes. He’s an exceptional person, who should be treated as such, like RBG.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

He’s an exceptional person, who should be treated as such, like RBG.

The close friend of Scalia's who opposed worker's rights, indigenous rights, and held up the constitutionality of solitary confinement? The one who prioritized her ego over not giving Trump an extra SCOTUS pick?

I have my criticisms of Bernie, but I would never put him in that category.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wasn’t aware of those votes. I’ll look into them. Thank you for pointing them out to me.

Her strong stance against gender and sexual orientation discrimination, and support for undocumented people as well as people with disabilities is why I mentioned her as an advocate for the people.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

She also stayed on too long even when others were begging her to retire because Hillary Clinton wanted to pick her replacement. And then...

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We also wouldn’t be dealing with this trump circus. The DNC really fucked everyone over

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I wholeheartedly blame that election on Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

And they're doing it again right now but for some reason people lose their shit when you speak about it.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

He’d be rounding out his second term right now. He was clearly up to the task. I hope he remains in the Senate until he passes.

I fear that if things get any worse, we'll have to "Weekend at Bernie's" him.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There are worse ideas. I won’t tell if you don’t.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope he remains in the Senate until he passes.

I hope we get enough progressives in the Senate so that he can retire.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

67 + 2 in the event one dies and the another resigns?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I'd prefer if he leaned more heavily into supporting upcoming socialist politicians throughout his state to help lead the next generation of leftist politicians into power.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

We must continue his legacy...

https://youtu.be/ZlZaVtCT5HI

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

How do you add some text automatically to the comments/posts? Or do you do it manually?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine if the DNC and liberal media apparatus had supported his presidential campaign instead of doing everything they could to kneecap it.

Really was a massive mistake to push Clinton and the pied piper strategy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sanders has historically been Israel-friendly. This heel-turn has been the result of enormous public pressure from his leftist base.

Its possible that a President Sanders would have been equally receptive to shifts in public attitude towards Israel. But I wager that his willingness to bend towards popular sentiment is precisely the reason the DNC / Liberal Media won't back him. They want their Bush / McCain / Biden stubborn conservatism, because its better for fundraising among elites and feeds into the DC Media idea of "integrity".

You have to remember that "populism" has become a dirty word in American politics, particularly among DC elites. Its very much Us-versus-Them for the insider class. Caving to "Them" is seen as a sign of weakness and betrayal.

Really was a massive mistake to push Clinton and the pied piper strategy.

It worked in so far as it got us to Biden, eventually. Neoliberals were willing to suffer 4 years of reactionary social politics to cement their economic gains. And they'll be willing to do it again in November, if it means "Biden was too much of a leftist" is the message ingrained on people's brains when he loses.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If that's the take away from a Biden loss then totalitarianism really is inevitable in this country because it would indicate that the only party in a position to resist fascism, has refused to ever do so.

I suppose we'll see, though you'd never catch me betting against neoliberal stupidity.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

the only party in a position to resist fascism, has refused to ever do so.

Real Weimer Republic Hours. The Friekorps will drag Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht out back and shoot them, for organizing students in a protest against the state. But they can only ever managed to deliver a slap on the wrist to a young German officer and Beer Hall afficianado, before annointing him Chancellor in an electoral wave year.

you’d never catch me betting against neoliberal stupidity

The US has been running on fumes since the 2008 financial crash. Even if Biden manages to eek out another 40,000 vote win-margin by November, he's stuck with a Congress that hates him and an economy that's powered entirely by magic beans. That means we get another Trump/Trump-adjacent candidate in 2028 and 2032 and 2036 and...

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think it's possible to be both a Zionist (Zionist-lite?) AND opposed to mass murder and genocide... including that of the native Palestinian population.

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

idk, at this point it feels like saying you're a Republican because you support Abraham Lincoln's ideas

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

I was very pleased to see the ICC interested in the arrests of both Netanyahu and Hamas leadership

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I wonder how much of Biden's outrage is because of support for Bibi, and how much of it is because the ICC could start issuing warrant for US presidents?

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

The US already has a law in place that stipulates that the president can use all means necessary, including military action, to release any US personnel that have been arrested by the ICC.

They aren’t afraid that the ICC is going to issue a warrant for a US president. Because they can just park their aircraft carriers in the North Sea near The Hague beach and invade Dutch airspace. And what is the EU going to do in that case? US already has troops and equipment on EU soil.

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 32 points 2 years ago

While they can do so, that's a very effective way to permanently destroy relations between the EU and the US. The US will be unable to effectively project power onto both Europe and the Middle East once the military bases in Europe are closed down in the aftermath. It will be the US's biggest loss in soft power since its founding.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 19 points 2 years ago

ICC arrest warrants are not about actually detaining people, Bibi won't end up in the Hague either.

The point is isolation. If the US president would get convicted, they wouldn't be able to attend a G7 summit anymore for example.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Netherlands could invoke NATO article 5, no?

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago

They certainly could try, but who do you think actually enforces NATO?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

100% the former. Biden supported the ICC until it started going after his pal. Now he just gave Putin a propaganda freebie.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The U.S. has an infamous history of obstructing the ICC otherwise the previous 3 president's would be potentially facing war crimes charges.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The USA have a law that they have to send the military to Den Haag in case the ICC tries to prosecute any US Soldiers or officials: ASPA or the Hague Invasion Act.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure the dutch government has laws making such an invasion illegal.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think everyone has laws making invasions illegal, that does not seem to mean anything to the attackers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably a mix of both. This is an issue that Biden us actually ideological on, he is genuinely a zionist. But he also has that habitual conservative infatuation with the status quo and sitting on fences.

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Sigh... Dragging this back out again.

https://youtu.be/moNHfeBJ81I

load more comments
view more: next ›