I cannot recommend this organization highly enough. They provide nonpartisan information on candidates in every state for every election.
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
109 points (91.0% liked)
No Stupid Questions
35737 readers
948 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is a good one. I’ve also used ballotpedia. Typically I use multiple sources just by google/bing/ddg/etc searching to confirm information on the candidate. Worked extremely well last mayoral election where we kicked an incumbent out who didn’t do a terrible job but we needed a change.
Just checked this site out and it looks pretty superb on the surface. Each candidate has links to the sites and social media, their experiences and stances are aggregated there and there's an option to contribute more information.
The true test will be to see how it handles extremely local candidates like the school board, which I struggled to find information on in the last election.
I'm not sure about school board because I don't think we vote for those where I am. I know they reach out to candidates that don't have easily found information and if the candidate doesn't respond the organization says so. It's really helpful for judges in particular because it lists all the ratings from various legal organizations.
I mean the school board is just citizens. So you'd have to like... Dig. Spokeo or a PI. Both cost money.
I’ve used vote411.org in the past and it’s done a decent enough job for me to double check local candidates and their policies ideas prior to elections. I’m willing to try others though. Any thoughts on vote411?
The local newspapers in my area send each candidate in every race a form of question that they then print. Typically it is very easy to tell which candidates understand what the that form is, there are those that don't understand, and then there are ones that don't return it. It's makes choosing much easier for me. I'll still pull of websites and check past news articles for each one I am considering.
Support your local newspapers!
First i go to vote411 (.org i think). It's a website from the league of women voters that asks each candidate the same questions. Sometimes candidates don't answer or are so vague that their answers are useless. Then i look to see who the local newspaper is endorsing. When both of those are unsuccessful, i find the hateful group (in Texas it's the true Texas project), see who they endorse, and vote opposite.
I used this same tactic on other websites (mentioned in other comments) and it works extremely well. The incumbent failed to answer certain questions while a new candidate was eager to and had some really great game plans to tackle issues our city was facing. They ended up winning which was awesome and started putting policies in place that are doing good for people in the city.
I applaud OP for making an effort to get involved locally but can sympathize with their struggles. Local government elections typically have a more new candidates that don’t have a track record of experience to go back on. Additionally, there are a handful of boilerplate campaign promises that you’ll see over and over again (smart spending, lower taxes, etc). I’ve personally found some success with the following approaches:
-
Even if you don’t get a ton of info from the candidate themselves, it’s still worth it looking at their website and seeing what they choose to make the centerpiece of their campaign.
-
Look up your local Democratic and Republican Party websites and see who they endorse. Often, even if a candidate is unaffiliated, the local political parties will have some insight as to who THEY would prefer. That tells you something too.
-
Try to attend local government events. You’ll learn a TON by attending a city council or school board meeting. In my local area, I’ve seen representatives half asleep or reading newspapers during discussions. At the very least, look at who takes the position seriously. Additionally, try to see who is asking smart questions, and conveys that they understand the subject matters well.
I think we should be encouraging more people for get involved locally. That’s how grassroots efforts turn into more options nationally.
I really like #3. Yes, it’s going to take more work than just searching them online but, they’re right, you will learn a lot just by seeing how involved/passionate the candidate is to actually make change for the good of others even if you disagree with some of their policies. At least you can sleep at night knowing they actually give a crap.
I'd debate the more work part. Sitting and watching vs hunting and gathering.
In my neck of the literal woods this has become an incredibly simplistic exercise. It used to be that I'd take the time to research their positions on specific issues... sometime even calling them up and asking questions. What party they belonged to was not always a reliable indicator of this so it was worth taking the time. But these days, where I live, we're lucky to get even one candidate who is not a mouth breathing MAGA cult member.
So I just look up their voter registration and political contributions.
Same issues in my neck of the woods. Since they all feel the same why I tend to pick the ones that at least talk to (some) residents.
Everyone else gave good advice. Also, if you have a group you support, like the ACLU or the EFF, they often have recommendations.
This. The League of Women Voters is really good at doing summaries about candidate positions. And while they obviously have an agenda, they tend to be pretty level-headed about their analyses, and avoid rhetoric.
Of course they have agenda. Thay aren't called "The League of Nonbinary Voters".
This works particularly well if you're mostly a single issue voter. If you're about the environment above all else, for instance, the Sierra Club's recommendations are pretty solid. If it's guns, guns and only guns, the NRA is your group.
For small local races you might have to do some homework yourself though, Sierra Club doesn't always discuss who is running for your local school board.
They'll usually have a website and other online presences that'll let you get a sense for what they stand for. If its a really, really small community, maybe just send them an email or phone call and ask them.
This last election, I googled the candidates and voted for the ones that hadn't tried to ban books at the local library.
I research the name of the candidates and do research on them. Sometimes I'm left only between an R and and D so I guess I just pick D since I have no other choice. When I get multiple D then I check the campaign page, ballotpedia, wiki to see what they stand for.
Judges also the same way, although they're a little trickier since they try not to side with any one party but some stuff may give them away you kinda just have to check their entire background.
OP:
there's almost no information about them online that I can find.
Response:
I research the name of the candidates and do research on them
I guess at that point, they must've done a shit job at campaigning. Vote for one with a D I guess
Different countries have different sources of information about candidates.
I don't live in the US but absorb quite a lot of political media from there. Number 1 rule is not to back Republicans, especially if you can't find much information on them. There are Republicans up and down the ballot who are trying to implement a Christian Nationalist agenda, many of them on the down-low, and if you have no evidence either way it's better to assume they are.
Next step is to google/bing/ddg the ones you're considering and see what you can dig up on them and their opinions. Do they have a history of unsavoury social media posts? Do they go to church? Who is their pastor? What do they stand for? Are they incumbent, or have they previously held office? What did they say / vote for before?
Thank you for taking an interest in local and down-ballot races. Your participation is vital to keep fascists and lunatics out of school boards and sherrif's offices.
Have you considered talking to them? Yeah it might take time but depending on how local, they’d probably love to meet for coffee or something.
You can also research their endorsements. Does a candidate have endorsements from local unions, newspaper, other public servants? Do you trust the endorser?
As you continue to vote and follow these local elections, you will get better at learning about them. The best thing to do is to be involved yourself. If you become active with civic organizations, you'll be more connected to what is happening with local leadership (churches, cleanup groups, food bank, trade groups, etc.). Basically see if you can volunteer wherever you usually donate locally.
The League of Women Voters in your area will usually have in-depth info on candidates and issue on your ballot.
I just call them up for a chat. At the local level they're usually super excited that anybody cares.
Campaign materials and newspaper articles. In the US, it's pretty rare even for small communities, not to find at least some of this information online.
What I can find all say seem to say more or less the same things about every candidate.
Do they have the exact same amount of experience as well?
Like, even if their platforms are the same, they probably have different backgrounds and accomplishments.
Thank you for mentioning experience. Voting on local elections is basically being in charge of a job interview. In a lot of cases, their stance on policy issues matters far less than their ability to do the job well.
I would look up your local paper specifically, if you haven't already. They aren't always going to show up in search results.
My local paper often does a brief "meet the candidates" piece for the city council, so you may find the same. Although they won't have everything all the time
I know it's still online, but I'm not sure if you've done this already. I personally join community groups on Facebook and see how they interact with people. It's been quite telling.
Have you tried contacting them with questions about issues that concern you?
I mean it depends on where you're from obviously. However, local elections might be more important to you than you would think. Local politics can have a direct impact in your neighborhood and may influence your personal life much more than state elections for example. Relevent topics can be traffic, parks, school etc. For example I elected people that want to promote ways for cyclists and that push local community projects.
Maybe we need a minimum amount of published information before a candidate can run.
There are people who are running (and winning) locally that I can’t even find a single source about online. Usually the likes of judges, commissioners, school boards etc.
I have a policy of not voting for anyone who hasn't talked to me in person
I look up the candidates/parties on their respective web sites and check out their positions.
Amazing, I know.
Did you read the post? They said there is no affiliation and minimum info online
I’m interpreting OPs original comment in a way that makes me think he doesn’t entirely trust what the candidates themselves say. I think that says something about where our society is today.
I was easy at my old house. Just vote for the person that doesn't have the majority of yard signs. Even for non-partisan elections, the republican fuck nuts will still put up signs so you just vote for who they aren't voting for. Except for the lady that wanted to bring Agile shit to local government.
It's really hard to tell, without living in your area, and knowing where they will debate. I'd say thats the first stop, is any debate they have. If they have no party, and have no debates, and have no info online, then it almost seems like it's intentionally confusing.
If I were running for government, I'd be on the mountain tops yelling my positions. I'd be at every debate.
I'd be on your streets, figuring out what to do. Talking with the people. Seeing what public opinion is. Finding out where the local problems are.
If none of that is happening, I would write to both your candidates by hand delivered usps mail, asking why their motivation is to encourage voter apathy.
If I don't know, and can't figure out who you are, or what you stand for, or what your beliefs are, why the hell am I voting for you??? It's the same reason I shoot down the idea that Dwayne THE ROCK Johnson should be president. I have no idea what his beliefs or stance on anything is. Part of that is the fact that he's not a politician, nor has he ever hinted at it to my knowledge. He has no reason to state his political standings, and that's fine. He's NOT on any ballot. If people write him in, it was never his responsibility to live up to their expectations. Yet, I still people online saying him, and snoop dogg.
THEY don't have any responsibility to tell you their beliefs, as despite being celebrities they are still just average citizens.......but actively running local politicians do. If they can't tell you what their vision for their terms in office are, then what the hell are you even voting for? May as well just post pictures of your pets and get votes for cute dogs, but /c/aww exists for that.
view more: next ›