this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
266 points (98.2% liked)

News

23644 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BurningnnTree@lemmy.one 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad that the government is trying to address the issue of social media, but obviously adding warnings isn't going to do anything.

I think the only way to actually solve the problem would be to regulate the recommendation algorithms to make them less addictive and less harmful.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

It seems like an awareness campaign is a good start. People on this platform are generally very social media savvy, but the harms of social media are far from common knowledge.

One of the most important things that Lemmy has done is to introduce a transparent ranking algorithm. It turns out that people do like algorithms in our social media, as long as we can see and control them. There's nothing sinister about an algorithm when you can easily see what is getting boosted and why (and switch it off at will)

Other federated media are developing personalized algorithms that will be well suited to other platforms.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I like this idea. Unhealthy, addictive and combative environments should be labeled.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So, #MAGA should be labelled as such?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only issue it's those attracted to Maga would love being labeled that

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Convicted felons and adjudicated rapists wholeheartedly agree!

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah. They can still buy all their ironically unpatriotic clothing, but the tag has to have a little warning about the wearer's instability

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A lot of people don't understand how anything like this could help, but keep in mind that policy shapes society as much as the opposite. Yeah most social media users are going to roll their eyes and ignore warning messages, but we're out to help people, not necessarily today's people.

When you grow up around the normalization of something like, the "officially sanctioned" knowledge that social media can be dangerous, it gives you something for your brain to connect with when you realize you've been ruminating for hours or days about what someone thinks about you on the internet. It really does help the brain when you can more easily identify a threat.

And more than anything, this would set a powerful precedent in the social view of mental health. Again, when you grow up seeing a thing is normal, you are more readily able to identify the source of the problem when a bad thing is happening to you.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

People who think this doesn't or won't do anything are completely overlooking the advertising revenue impact. If social media must carry these warning labels, that devalues the ad space they sell. Does coca cola, Ford, etc. really want their ads to show up on content with these warning labels? Will they be getting a discount on ad space because it's better to deliver ads to users on platforms that don't have this warning?

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

America is so contrarian they might up their social media intake even more tbh

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In Canada the cigarette warning labels had horrible pictures of the damage smoking can cause, and all my friends that smoked liked collecting them like baseball cards.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

They were already addicted. The warnings are not made for them.

[–] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 0 points 6 months ago

actually sounds like a fun hobby

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I can’t tell if this dude is 23 years old or 53 years old.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Young face old hair

[–] DonGirses@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Dall-E lookin' ass

[–] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

(Platform) may cause birth defects, lung cancer, death

[–] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

How Money Changes the Way You Think and Feel

Money is clearly harmful. Let's put a warning label on every bill and coin: "Addictive"?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I started smoking as a teenager after those warnings were put on cigarettes. I did it despite knowing it was addictive and it was bad for me.

Kids don't give a shit. They think they're immortal.

But sure, waste your time.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Those warnings had a statistically significant effect on smoking rates. Just because it doesn't work on everyone doesn't mean it doesn't work.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Please let me see these statistics.

[–] UFO64@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago
[–] fah_Q@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait to have to sign in with your driver's license to get on Facebook think of the children.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Already true for porn sites in some states. The inevitable data leak will not be pretty.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

The idea of a warning is not because anyone thinks you're going to read it and get scared and stop doing the thing you're hooked on.

The idea of a warning label is so your ice-age brain, the brain that loves to make up stories to explain things, has something to connect with when you start having a negative experience on something like social media, or something to help you realize that the thing, whatever it may be, is addictive and the reason you're having problems is because of that addictive quality. We greatly overestimate our brains and our capacity to properly identify threats and tell ourselves the correct story to escape the threat.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 6 months ago

Same. How many teens currently vape? Wait, did they not know these substances are harmful?