interestingasfuck

That's really cool, thank you.
I like how it goes from being a light turbine to a water-cooler.

Lighthouse are cool, i'd be really sad to see the structure go.

This is what Graphics cards will look like in 10 years

They look thick and inefficient

They look thick and inefficient

That's the difference between making a light that can be seen over a large area vs lights to brightly illuminate a large area. Lighthouses only need to be seen not illuminate the sea.

But yeah, I would have guessed it to be higher as well.

I had a 100W LED that would put your eye out. Even with a fat heat sink and fan it partially burned itself. Kinda scary to deal with.

I'm guessing each LED is 200W?

Those fins are dissipating way more than 200W

Fresnel lense

Fresnel lense

Even for incandescent technology, the efficiency actually goes up with wattage, whilst for LEDs it's roughly the same (if I remember correctly, it mostly decays with temperature), so even for incandescent the gains in switching to LEDs actually fall as the original lamp wattage goes up.

Further, given the consumption of lighhouse lamps it makes sense that they had already been switched earlier from incandescent or similar, to the same kind of tech as street lights (i.e. some kind of high power fluorescent), which is a more efficient tech.

Last but not least there is one fluorescent technology (I'm not sure anymore if it's sodium vapor or if it is mercury vapor) that is (or at least it was a few years ago) more efficient than LED technology, but only really works well for very large lights (again, I roughly remember something like 1000W - so stuff like stadium illumination). At least in terms of consumption there is no point in changing from that to LED technology as it would be a step back.

So it makes sense that for some lighthouse lights they're not even replacing the lights with LEDs whilst when they do replace them the gains percentage-wise are a lot less than one would get from replacing one's 80W incandescent light bulbs with the equivalent modern LEDs (which would be maybe 12 - 15W).

the trick’s on you - it’s not open for tours at night.

the trick’s on you - it’s not open for tours at night.

Yes. LEDs on that scale generate a lot of heat. Far less than a normal bulb on the same scale, but the problem is that an LED array is more compact and sensitive, so it retains heat much better, and is more sensitive to it.

Source: I've retrofitted a lot of old ships with more modern LED "bulbs" for their search light.

The link should have all the details!

Looking at the datasheet and pictures I think the heatsink is just aluminum. Looks like an extrusion (which means it's the same shape over the full length) with a solid center that they machine down in the middle area to mount the LEDs. The large amount of material and good conduction of the aluminum will absorb and distribute the heat without needing water cooling or heat pipes.

These LEDs use up to 200W and the heatsink on here probably weighs more than 10x as much as a heatsink on a 500+W graphics card. Watercooling and heat pipes are necessary when you need to get a lot of heat out with a minimum amount of material, such as for cars and home computers. Costs more than a big block of aluminum but the you don't need to move that much wieght around. For a light like this, the extra weight and space it takes up doesn't matter.

Probably not, I think. The only mention of cooling I saw on the website was "Anodised heat sinks to maintain cool running of LEDs on steady burning duties."

Um, what?

EDIT

Their website says it's suitable for fixed placement or rotation.

https://www.sealite.com/lighthouse-led-lights/

EDIT 2

Oh maybe this is what you meant, quote from the website:

Directional setup of LEDs for additional power saving by not shining light over land where not required

Nope, those huge lenses spin around it

Nope, those huge lenses spin around it