this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
244 points (98.4% liked)

News

22890 readers
3661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, when you are director, it's only fair that your head is on the line if there is a major fuck up. I'm sure she made plenty of money and will turn around some cush job.

We were a cow farting a county over from the entire future of US history changing forever. Doesn't suprise me that politicians who rely on the secret service lost faith in her ability to keep them safe

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The committee absolutely demolished her during a hearing. Mostly because she kept trying to throw her weight around and wouldn't answer questions with straight answers. She also claimed, as the damn Director, to not have access to certain bits of knowledge the committee was able to obtain with minimal effort, from reports made by the Secret Service.

So yeah. Take what you will from that.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She's covering for the people on the ground who fucked up. She's not throwing people under the bus. Sign of good leadership.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Usually, yes. However, this is the Secret Service. Make no mistake, I very much dislike Trump greatly. They were assigned a very important task and failed tremendously, if this wasn't some on-purpose 4D chess bullshit. They exist for two major reasons and on one of them at the best showed incredible incompetence that day. This should be taken serious.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

.. But covering doesn't solve the problem.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think they'll make the same mistake?

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes. Trump is their at least 2nd known mistake (after Kennedy).

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Reagan got shot one time

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

On a long enough time scale, every cow farts changes US history forever. With each flatulence, thousands of empires fall.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why can’t we hold CEOs to the same standard?

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right. Like that clown running Crowdstrike, who failed up after a stint at McAfee. There have been two global IT catastrophes on his watch (one at each of those companies), and somehow he keeps getting put in better positions to start the next one.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

That idiot needs to never be allowed to work in an industry that uses computers ever again.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Also make the metaphorical rolling heads, real !

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh man, and it was right after she said she definitely wouldn’t. There’s a lot of that going around.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Came here to say this. I wonder who’s next.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope Biden appoints a new director who does even less for Trump.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Stormy Daniels your time has come.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Her interview with congress was painful to watch. It is a mystery how she even got the job based on her answers

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, which is kind of surprising if you look at her Wikipedia, she had plenty of experience within the secret service. I guess this is just a case of being promoted beyond your competence level, as I assume there's a huge difference between doing the work as a secret service agent and being able to properly deal with the politics of Congress.

And I guess she's ultimately responsible for whatever oversight caused them to allow someone with a rifle to get onto a roof 100m from a presidential candidate, whether that's due to hiring, procedural issues or just general lack of oversight.

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To me, the local PD seems to have plenty of fault. (Surprised she didn't throw them under the bus.) The shooter's on top of a building, outside of SS perimeter. And incredibly, it's literally full of local PD, apparently emergency response (SWAT).

There seems to have been severe communication issues from all involved: Knew of suspect for hour, lost him, searched, finally checked roof, too late. SS sniper seems to have had him in sights, but did not shoot until after (perhaps thought he could be local PD). They all deserve blame for the almost comedy of errors. I think the wind might've done more to prevent the assassination.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but the buck doesn't stop at the local PD, if the local PD aren't handling their end of things properly it's the secret services job to notice that, and either correct it themselves or not let the person they're protecting go out in an improperly secured area.

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Agreed. Just saying they definitely deserve some blame. (And the BS their local DA has been saying is annoying at best.) The simplest thing should have been to delay or postpone the event. But I imagine they almost always have "people of interest" at events, and (somehow) never did see a gun or weapon.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

If this were Tesla she'd not only not resign but be given a huge pay increase.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I asked this earlier, but do we have any idea if this was gross incompetence, gross cowardice, or they wanted it to happen? How do you note that the gunman is on the roof for 20 minutes, have another officer from local PD back down when he has a gun pointed at him and still they do nothing