this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
499 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
4666 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 161 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Title reads like an onion headline.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I legit thought it was a joke too.

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It reads like thick satire, I think it's a joke.

Edit: I think I misinterpreted you referring to Apple and not the article. Oh well lol.

[–] Rough_N_Ready@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I read it in the voice of Professor Farnsworth lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What happens if I use it on an Android phone? Will it burst into flames?

[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 90 points 1 year ago

A chemical compound causes the cloth to turn blue when polishing an iPhone, green when polishing an Android. It's only a subtle difference.

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tim Apple shows up at your house with a baseball bat.

It’s ok though, he just wants to talk.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might want to watch out your front window Larry, you'll see what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

This voids the cloths warranty.

[–] desmondjones@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Don’t they handle that on their own?

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I had to Google this because I didn't believe it was a real product.

Why on Earth would you buy one of these? You can literally wipe your phone screen with a microfibre cloth and you can buy a bunch of them for about £2.

[–] WorstPyroEver@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or do what everyone does and wipe back and forth real fast on your shirt

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been doing that for a lot of years, never had an issue.

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Shirt doesn't get it as clean and clear as a microfiber cloth. I have a few very large microfibers that I keep around the house and at least one in the car.

Also, shirt can and will scratch the screen, maybe not noticeable at first but over time it will do damage.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh it gets it clean enough for my purposes (no fingerprints). And I always have a screen protector on my devices so if anything it's damaging that. I've had a smart phone since an old-school Blackberry World Edition from shit...2007? Though I guess my first touch screen one was a Blackberry Storm a year later. Regardless, never had any issues whatsoever. That's obviously anecdotal but still.

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

I think I got ny first blackberry around the same time. Still have my 9700 around here somewhere and last time I checked it still worked. Maybe I notice it more but the shirts I wear don't clean my glasses or my phone very well, all they do is move the oils around and it isn't as clear as it can be.

I've stopped worrying about screen protectors with the latest editions of gorilla glass.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve been cleaning my iphone XS with my shirt for 5 years straight and the screen isn’t scratched at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

With the hardened glass going into phones combined with the oleophobic coatings they get, you really aren't likely to do a bit of damage for the light rubbing you need to get oils off the screen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If we used to be able to clean screens with a cloth, and now need a microfiber to not damage it, that means it was a downgrade.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

Fine print: use of non-Apple cleaning tools voids warranty.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, this looks more premium. I'd be willing to buy it for up to 5 bucks.

Edit: $19, way too much

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] weew@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it certified for clockwise wiping only, or is it bidirectional?

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago

I think it is a subscription based model.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the opposite of whatever everyone else does

[–] Cheez@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"Natural" wiping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wax on, wax off.

[–] art@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You're wiping it wrong.

[–] PlushySD@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Phewww.. I thought I have to buy the iSwipe Pro Max 27 for $1,000 to clean my new iPhone

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apple assures us that this cloth, with its supple “nonabrasive material,” can “safely and effectively” clean any Apple display, even the high-tech nano-texture glass of the Pro Display XDR.

If the insinuation is that the Pro Display XDR has glass that needs special care, that sounds like a product that many would not consider a good choice for "pros".

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the reviews says that the incredibly expensive monitor has that micro texture on the glass that will impregnate with finger oils making it extremely hard to clean. So when a client touches your screen (because clients always need to physically touch your screen when they need to prove their point) it will leave a permanent mark on it. So "pro"

[–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My old manager once drew on my screen with his pen when pointing out something.

He would also leave his coffee cups on my desk including a nasty ring.

I was so glad when he left, and am even more glad to work from home where people can't draw on my damn monitor.

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

I have another point that I don’t see talked about a lot that I would like to consider. Their XDR Pro model is targeting actual professionals in the video field. Unlike pretty much everything that Apple makes, this monitor is comparable (and downright cheap) when compared side by side with other industry standard color calibrated video monitors. Professional grade video equipment has always been super expensive, and it’s not just an Apple thing. For example, here’s a Sony model commonly used in live broadcast. Same size, but the Apple monitor is actually 1.6X as bright for HDR, it’s higher resolution, and less than half the price. The only downsides being no SDI input, but it can still be used for post-processing just fine, or even live with a converter box. It also informs why the stand for the monitor doesn’t come standard, and is expensive as hell— it’s because they don’t expect anyone in their target market to buy it. They expect most of these monitors to be installed as a drop in replacement in color grading workflows or broadcast trucks, which are all pretty much fully vesa mounted already anyway.

In that context, their XDR Pro monitor makes perfect sense. On a cost basis alone, Apple’s monitor offering is very competitive for the professional video demographic they’re targeting. It’s not for the average power user, it’s for people whose literal sole job rides on colors being accurate.

As for the polishing clothes, yes they’re expensive when purchased separately, but they come “for free” in the box. I would rather they sell them separately than not at all, but the screen really doesn’t require anything special, just any old microfiber cloth should be fine, as long as the cloth is kept clean. Even that markup isn’t insane IMO, it appears to only be a 5-10$ markup on an accessory of a monitor they expect to be very low volume.

Overall, I think the product is just misunderstood more than anything. I don’t think it’s being advertised wrong, I think Apple just has such a proclivity to advertise their other products wrong that people’s expectations aren’t set correctly for when they are actually addressing the actual professional market (cough cough the iPhone PRO, a product that isn’t really a “professional” product in any sense of the word). These are just what professional grade products cost. Sure it’s expensive, but that’s what they have to cost to make these devices viable for any business to manufacture. The combination of low volume, high cost for components with a better than average precision, and pro grade calibration means that they just plain cost a lot more to make.

Equipment like this and the Sony monitor above are used in environments where they just need to work EVERY single time, and there is 0 room for failure. As an example, running shading (color grading) on a live broadcast, think events like the super bowl. Using any old monitor, you may not be able to tell the coke ad you are cueing up is going through your shading workflow, and their red branding is slightly off-color. That could easily be a million+ dollar mistake, I’ve seen similar things actually happen in the field (with other advertisers I will not mention for my own sake). Or god forbid you loose picture entirely. I’ve been in similar positions, and broadcast engineers/companies will pay any amount of money to make sure their equipment is top of the line, and won’t fail ever. If you don’t believe me, take a look at some other pro grade video gear, like a grass valley kayenne. The scale of money is simply, different with pro video equipment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article is really trying for an eye-rolling kind of tone while at the same time, literally just being an advertisement for new Apple products.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't know why but polishing cloth strikes me as slightly dirty lol

Exit: would also accept "rubs me the wrong way"

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

This is why I like apple.

I just updated the firmware of my apple cloth and now it cleans 10% faster.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though soon it will be transitioning to a subscription based model.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Lower upfront cost, but they get you in the long run.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 11 points 1 year ago

Knowing Apple, they must have thought about a way to make old polishing cloths specifically incompatible with their newer screens.

[–] merrick@normalcity.life 9 points 1 year ago
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm surprised they didn't mention it during their totally not cringeworthy meeting with mother nature

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the thing about Apple and why this sort of thing doesn't bother me. Overall, their hardware, at least their phones and notebooks, are relatively similarly priced to the competition with similar hardware. Then they charge buckets for all the accessories. But if you pay for those accessories, that's on you. It's not an Apple Tax, it's a Stupid Tax.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not an Apple Tax, it’s a Stupid Tax.

If you buy Apple products, you are already grandfathered into that Stupid Tax.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And of course sold at a vastly inflated price.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It’s that time of year again — the time when millions around the world nail their eyeballs to the Apple Store website and wait, unblinking, to find out whether the new iPhones and Apple Watches are compatible with the $19 Polishing Cloth Apple launched in 2021.

After all, you bought the cloth as soon as Apple announced it, and you know all about planned obsolescence.

That brings the grand total to almost 120 supported devices, per my quick count.

Apple assures us that this cloth, with its supple “nonabrasive material,” can “safely and effectively” clean any Apple display, even the high-tech nano-texture glass of the Pro Display XDR.

Apple launched the cloth alongside its M1 Pro and Max chips and third-generation AirPods, and in the two years since, it’s no doubt cleaned countless Apple screens the world over.

To save you a trip to its product page, the Apple Polishing Cloth now supports:


The original article contains 230 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 33%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

To save you a trip to its product page, the Apple Polishing Cloth now supports:

Supports what maaaaaan??

[–] bender@insaneutopia.com 3 points 1 year ago

Dont forget to tip your waitress folks.

load more comments
view more: next ›