this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
287 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 125 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that seems to be a defense of conspiracy theories.

otherwise it should read "everything is a conspiracy when you don't understand how anything works" — without the word theory.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Huh. I guess it’s not the Jews this time.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Who do You think she meant by "they"?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

US Postal Service, actually. How do you think they can promise "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds."

(Yes, that noise you're hearing in the background is my manic cackle idly daydreaming about conspiracy theorists running with this.)

I mean… what do you think the space lasers are for since they are not being used for Peace™ right now.

/s because it’s sadly necessary

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure it was a certain subset of democrats she was talking about

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has sparked a backlash after appearing to suggest that Democrats "can control the weather.

Her tweet was "Democrats control the weather."

She's not suggesting anything.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, instead of blaming the weather on God's wrath for the gays, they're just straight up blaming Democrats now? Have they lost their faith or did they never have it in the first place?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 55 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Weather control claims are firmly in the weird category.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 46 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“We can change the weather”

Also

“Climate change isn’t real”

Pick a fucking lane lady.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if we could actually get them to say this we would be making headway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

She seems the type to think all the lanes belong to her and fuck you, get out of her way!

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Careful, since weather and climate are the same to them, they’ll say the democrats are intentionally heating up the climate so they have an excuse to take away their beloved coal rolling trucks.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

well. there are some weather control technologies that actually exist. Like seeding rain for crops. it's fairly common in most places these days.

but there's no way to precipitate a hurricane or stop one.

[–] Baggins@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

“About 3 minutes and ding its done!”

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And this is the problem with the way she worded it and everyone blowing it off as just weird instead of straight up fucking stupid.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

well she didn't mean any of the rain precipitators. She meant, they actively controlled hurricanes. It's both weird and fucking stupid.

Actually. I wonder what would happen if you took a microwave array, of appropriately huge power, and directed it at the hurricane's flanks, you know. to heat up the water on that side. maybe make some wind. I bet you could steer it "some"....

(Mexico, if you're reading this, I absolutely won't try this, if you send me your best street taco recipe.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Appears!? She literally tweeted, “Yes they can control the weather.”

[–] ech@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read that as in "shows up to say".

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

No, that’s the Korporate News Kushion for Konservatives

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s that neutral “both sides” media bullshit- just like you can’t call someone “school shooter”, it’s “alleged school shooter” until the court ruling come down the pipe six months later.

Is this better? Idk.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

This idea has been floating around the right for a while. I think it's a way to explain the effects of climate change while blaming the libs.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they could, Helene would have erased Mar-a-Lago from the map.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While I enjoy the humor, the fact is they'd have aimed it away from landfall.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I mean, if you could control the weather, why not make a Mar-a-Lago sized hurricane?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Democrats see a mentally ill person standing on the corner ranting and raving and shouting insane gibberish, and they think it's sad and we should help that poor person.

Republicans see the same thing and think we should elect that poor person.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the Democrats control the weather, but humans burning fossil fuels does nothing to the climate

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hilarious that people who don't believe in climate change also believe that the weather can be controlled and targeted at specific communities. And by "hilarious" I mean "makes me want to start hitchhiking to Uruguay".

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought about that only to realize that the people Uruguay are probably equally as bad and I'm stuck here on this rock with billions of them until someone gives me a ride.

[–] TIN@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

There is a giant ball there. And evil apes. And the evil apes are dukin' it out on the ball. You're one of them. It's basically all just evil apes dukin' it out on a giant ball.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Was this during their attempt to take over Central City and destroy The Flash? Do they also have a freeze gun, spin like a top, and jump into mirrors?

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah one of my cousins even mentioned some dude he knows was saying the Dems intentionally shifted the hurricane to clear out the area for lithium mining

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Democrats had thst power I feel we use it to wipe her and Donald Trump along rest of Maga out of this country. I wish we had Xman like Storm. Blow Trump plabe right out of the sky and into the sea.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

No kidding. If Dems could do that, Florida would already be underwater.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Very charitable to assume her “they” meant The Democrats and not The Jews.

Or maybe that weird ass HAARP conspiracy from awhile back.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If this is true, we gotta talk Biden into running again. I don't care if he can't talk or stay awake, I'll definitely vote for the weathermancer every time!

[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

From Stormy Delaware comes Cloudy Joe and his Lightning Lasers.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Newsweek: "appears to say"

She literally wrote: ""Yes they can control the weather,"

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

They really think we live in Red Alert 2

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

Is she confusing Democrats with Drakken from Kim Possible? Secondly, he used that machine to control Canada. So jokes on her.

[–] Octospider@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it possible to learn this power?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tbf, the USAF had the tech in the 90s to do this. (Edit: I am not saying the dems did the bad weather thing)

Openly stated in the AF 2025 documents

Weather as force multiplier. Owning the weather in 2025.

https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier.pdf

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s… that’s one of the most terrifying things I’ve ever read, because every page is completely realistic.

Like… holy shit

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

She truly is from another age. The Ice Age.

load more comments
view more: next ›