this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
111 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19095 readers
7305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 27 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

If Latinos and others Democratic voters who wanted to sit on their fucking hands or vote for Trump, they can go cry to someone else when Homeland Security knocks on their door looking for their undocumented relatives (or any of the legal citizens that get swept up by mistake).

When Trump and Netanyahu turn Gaza into glass, the Michigan voters who thought they wanted to punish Democrats can go to someone else to worry about getting the broom to sweep it up.

Elections have consequences.

We warned you of the consequences. REPEATEDLY! And now you get to live with them until next time

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

And if only Republicans weren't so fucking gung ho about destroying the country and everyone else in it. But elections have consequences, and the voting population, turns out, the majority are straight up evil. They were also warned of the consequences repeatedly, and decided "that's perfect for me!"

You can be mad at groups that wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome as much as you want. I'm going to be mad at the stupid filth that are busily trying to make life worse for everyone. Every single monster that voted for him deserves to lose everything.

[–] MidRomney@lemmy.world 2 points 40 minutes ago

until next time? these consequences are going to last far far far beyond the next election.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Hahahahah next time...we all know there's no next time

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hopefully this “mass deportation” will be as feeble as Trump’s 2 mile long joke of a wall…

[–] roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 26 minutes ago

That's the hope, but clearly we see that hope and a quarter gets you 25 cents and that's all

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 80 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

These immigrant haters are so dumb it's hard to get my head around. Illegals are the modern answer to slavery. They work their ass off for shit wages, pay taxes and get zero government benefits. And these rubes want to crash that system?!

Do they think Americans are going to the fields to pick watermelons?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 hours ago

This will be the main test of whether Trumpism rules or capital rules. The rich people love Republican tax cuts and deregulation, which was the main product of his first term (coincidentally everything the rich didn't like failed), but going after cheap immigrant labor or taxing their foreign sweat shops is going to stir up some behind the scenes conflict. Voters are stupid (e.g., "did Biden drop out" searches), they'll be surprised when the leopards eat their face, the rich people are well aware that the leopards are dangerous and hope that their leopard control devices can get them through unscathed with an even greater piece of the pie.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

The part that absolutely baffles me is that latinos shifted heavily to vote for Trump, for potentially the deportation of their own family members.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

was speaking with a colleague who lives near Padre - he said he had family members that felt, 'we're legal, we'll be fine, they'll just get rid of the newcomers'

they don't understand this is not a new thing and is racially driven, not truly an immigration issue.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

We told them the leopard was right fucking there and that it loves eating faces. They didn't believe us.

Oh well. 🤷

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I worked with a Mexican Trump supporter. He hated illegal immigrants because he immigrated legally and he was pissed they got away with it the "easy way".

[–] lath@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Before you say anything, just hear me out. There's like tons of prisons everywhere, so what if we march the prisoners at gunpoint to work the fields, for free?" ~ Trump administration, probably

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago

100% I think a lot of people don't realize that prisons are modern slavery. Need more slave labor? Send protesters to the gulag.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 38 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

They think the poorest Americans won't have a choice. They dont realize theres actually not enough people to fill out all these freshly vacated "opportunities".

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstand the plan. See, a good portion of other jobs will be taken by robots, offshore help, and AI. This leads to firing those employees at those companies where the jobs were taken over, and since there is no UBI and the available jobs will have massive competition, the people will have to take those jobs, be thrown in prison, or be homeless and persecuted (possibly executed) by authorities.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago) (1 children)

Nope, what you said is exactly what I think

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Ah! I misinterpreted what you wrote. Sorry about that.

Ugh, I really hope it doesn’t turn into that at all.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 30 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone will find out again what Georgia and Arizona learned and then forgot that it isn't that there isn't enough people, it's that White folks are snowflakes that can't handle the hard ass work.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

No, they don't realize why their strawberry packages are $2.

You are right, and OP is right.

[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

And if they succeed in cementing the Christian theocracy they can control them through religion. They only want freedom for themselves to subjugate everyone else.

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Had this conversation with my stepmom. She is complaining that peaches cost $1 each. She thinks this is too expensive and that the cost will go down now. I'm quietly kind of amazed that she thinks that she'll even find a peach that didn't rot on the ground for less than $10 or whatever they will cost once the labor goes up. I didn't say anything to her about it because it just doesn't matter anymore. It is pointless even to converse about any topic. We experience separate realities. She believes happy days are finally here, and I just don't care if she sees another peach ever again in her lifetime. Whatever happens to the peaches is her fault.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

You should have slapped her.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 3 hours ago

Do they think Americans are going to the fields to pick watermelons?

Yes, yes they do. They'll cheer the new federal child labor laws that allow for it and the increased prison population that will be forced to work the fields

[–] Jinni@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

This defense of not deporting people just highlights our issues with labor. This acknowledges that underpaid labor is a necessary part of our economic system.

I am against the deportation of these people but I would not justify it by justifying the system that is trying to under value all of our labor.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think it's about terrorizing their workforces. Construction, ag, meat packing, so many conservative heavy segments of the economy both import enormous amounts of labor, AND, want to legislate the threats to this population.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hahaha... hahaha... ha... ha...

You fucking morons. Welcome to massive cost inflation v2.

Better hope you're going to be changing jobs in the near future, because your current boss ain't going to be paying more despite raising all the prices because new labour costs will go up.

Also, you better not consume anything produced outside the US (even if it's also produced in the US) because the new tariffs are going to drive up prices there too.

The only people that benefit from these policies is corporate shareholders.

[–] cicebazna@discuss.online 4 points 4 hours ago

Well, they will buy the same people back from the government for a penny on the dollar, and then they will own them.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

On the one hand, this would be awful.

On the other hand, this is the same group of folks who couldn't come up with an infrastructure bill or a health care plan, which are both far smaller in scale than deporting millions of people. Trump complained about the cost of burying a soldier, just wait until he sees what it'll cost to hire, train, equip, and manage all those stormtroopers.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

you do realize there are still children, separated from their parents, who haven't been reunited? even in their incompetence, it's abject cruelty and hate.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Let's hope they don't decide it's too hard to depart people and just start shooting them.

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There will be plenty of volunteers willing to do it for free, I'm sure. Plus if you're not bothered about any kind of process, legal structure or anything other than "let's racistly victimise some people with the tacit approval of the state", and if many of them die in the process that's actually a bonus in your view, then you can really cut down on costs.

[–] cicebazna@discuss.online 5 points 4 hours ago

If the deportation doesn’t have to be documented, they could just burn the people like trash, or, Jews… but apparently that never happened, and Schindler’s List is fiction.

[–] cicebazna@discuss.online 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Right, which means putting them in… let’s call them “camps,” and holding them there is cheaper than arranging transportation. This could also provide free labor… or “slaves” if you will, which has been at the top of the GOP’s… I mean, Confederate’s list of desires for centuries.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Gotta pay to build the camps, and nobody's gonna work for Trump without getting paid up front

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

Well speaking of that, Trump's not going to have to spend a dime, he will have all of America's money at his disposal.

[–] cicebazna@discuss.online 3 points 3 hours ago

Oh, they will all be privatized. And the income will be from selling them as labor.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Time to stock up on chicken.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It will be incredibly brutal.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Sweet, looks like I get to experience the schadenfreude of those young Latino men sooner rather than later.