this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
376 points (98.7% liked)

News

23284 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s new "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) began recruiting "high-IQ small-government revolutionaries" willing to work 80+ hours per week with no pay to help slash federal spending.

Appointed by President-elect Donald Trump, the panel is tasked with recommending spending cuts, regulatory rollbacks, and agency restructuring by July 4, 2026.

Musk and Ramaswamy advocate for drastic measures, including cutting grants to nonprofits and potential mass layoffs.

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 26 points 10 hours ago

"high-IQ small-government revolutionaries"

No, "rich people," because nobody else can survive with no pay.

[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He really believes it’s real.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh it's real. It may not be a cabinet position but it can still be a committee.

[–] MicrowaveCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] MicrowaveCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 14 points 10 hours ago

Tragedy or comedy? Why not both?

[–] SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol 12 points 10 hours ago

Anyone smart enough wouldn’t want to work for him.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

“Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) began recruiting “high-IQ small-government revolutionaries” willing to work 80+ hours per week with no pay to help slash federal spending.

Future headline : “Department of Government Efficiency still completely without staff as those meeting the high requirements to take the job are smart enough to have zero interest in doing the job under those conditions"

Alternate future headline: "Department of Government Efficiency plagued by yet another scandal as its 45th employee is charged with fraud for attempting to personally gain financially from fraud they were perpetrating in the government".

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How does one apply to live in such futures? Because this timeline looks like a bunch of rich douches will join the committee, use it to get richer and live happily ever after.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I’m guessing they cut government departments, then privatize them by outsourcing the work to their own companies. Sounds like a solid grift.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 hours ago

Well, if nothing else it's efficient 😬

[–] 5h17h34d@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So, slavery will soon be making a comeback in 2025.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 9 points 10 hours ago

it never went anywhere

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

high IQ

work for free

lmao, hard pass. Thanks.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Would you do that, Elon? No you would not. And you'd be tweeting unfunny mocking bullshit at someone who did in any other circumstances.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

Sorry, I need to like, not starve to death.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Staff it with rich fucks looking for relevence deep in that Musky sphincter and change it to "Department of Getting Eaten". Efficiency accomplished.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

These people who get so incredulous about "soft" social sciences, (think critical theory) yet talk about IQ testing like it's Newton's 4^th^ law do not value, or do not understand the science. Even the serious people who defend IQ in good faith, speak of it with qualifications.

What is so attractive about a system to categorize and rank humanity? And what do the people who are attracted to it have in common?

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Fascists love the notion of a natural order, because it gives them license to hold power over people "lower in the hierarchy." They'll use anything and everything to establish whatever "natural order" serves their purpose at any given moment, and IQ works quite nicely in a lot of situations.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, most of that headline should be in quotations.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 4 points 10 hours ago

"Elon Musk's" "new department" seeks "super high" IQ "staff" for "unpaid jobs"

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 10 hours ago

"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago

i would consider signing up just to see how much shit i could irreparably fuck up before they notice

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Earth to Elon: Time is money you rich prick.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Seems like something people would not want to do.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Appointed by President-elect Donald Trump, the panel is tasked with recommending spending cuts, regulatory rollbacks, and agency restructuring by July 4, 2026.

I don't know why all the people who defended Biden wasting two years of the House/Senate are so worried about trump having 2 years of the House/Senate.

According to them no one can get anything accomplished in 2 years, and historically trump won't hold onto both the House and Senate for midterms.

The big difference seems to be Trump's incoming admin isn't waiting till 1/6 to start thinking about stuff, so they've got a big headstart on Biden's admin.

It's going to be real fucking embarrassing for moderates if trump pulls off something they just spent four years claiming was impossible.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

According to them no one can get anything accomplished in 2 years

The difference is that it's a lot easier and faster to break things than it is to build or repair them.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Not always.

Like, all the deportations, that would "break" our society, but to even attempt it would take huge amounts of money, planning, and competent people. Even to do it poorly.

Hell, even his threat to get rid of Department of Education, he can't just say "you're fired" and then everyone goes home. I mean, he could say that, he could order their pay stopped, he could even lock the doors and shut off all the networked IT.

But there would be a metric shitton of legal proceeding and resulting settlements for years.

It's just crazy to me that everyone thinks turning (at least the remnants of) a democracy into a dictatorship is just fucking declaring it like Michal Scott declares bankruptcy.

He's 100% going to try, I just don't know why people suddenly expect trump and his sycophants magically became competent in the last four years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›