this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
412 points (97.5% liked)

Android

28183 readers
135 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I'm not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots"? Like... wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It's my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I'm taking a screenshot. I don't care about whatever "security" the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can't save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn't have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots" my ass lmao, I'm taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 123 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The point of many of android's "protection" features isn't to protect the user from apps, but to protect apps from the user. I hate it.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago (14 children)

In this case, I think it's protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you're looking at bank statements, etc. I find that annoying, too, but I'm less annoyed by the reasoning in this case.

Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning...

[–] DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or changing or just adding a system font.

Or setting a charge capacity limit.

Or adding separate quick access tikes for wifi and cellular.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The first two don't bug me but dam, give me my 6 buttons back!! I hate these fat notification tray icons. And yes, fuck Google for making it take MORE clicks to toggle wifi/cellular than before.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

In this case, I think it's protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you're looking at bank statements, etc.

I think with all the engineers at Google developing Android they could come up with a solution of how to discern whether the act of screenshot was triggered solely by the user, or an app on the phone. They are the ones in power of all the APIs that allow other apps to capture the screen content in the first place. Maybe I am simplifying it too much, but this seems as a bad excuse to me.

Maybe it would be too hard of a solution since there's so many ways third party apps could capture screen content (including for example the Android accessibility service which also allows apps to read content of the screen and even simulate screen touches and gestures which many automation apps make use of) that blocking the screenshot alltogether is by far the most feasible solution.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Protections" are fine, as long as there's an override for it.

User doesn't like potential malware from "sideloading"? Then don't enable "Install from Unknown Sources".

Same thing with everything else, there should be an override switch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being able to block screenshots is "supposed" to protect users from having malware take screenshots of banking apps and other such information.

If app developers were good, this could have been a good feature.

But I agree with OP. It still should be the user's choice.

[–] Klajan@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

My Banking App does have the option to disable this feature.

It's all fine if it's a user choice, very annoying if it's not.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I fuckin hate that Playstation 4 and 5 do this for taking screenshots from movies. I just want to get a good screen grab for meme purposes! Do you think I'm going to screen shot every goddamn frame of a movie, one at a time, paste those back together as a video, then somehow rip the audio too, and then share this necromantically-assembled abomination with all my pirate buddies? Fuck you!

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now that is really stupid, especially given how easy it is to just fire up the movie on your PC and take a screenshot from there.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Netflix does this on windows too

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was able to use snipping tool to take screenshots when I had Netflix, but I also used it through my browser.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] beerclue@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I work for a company that builds an app /sdk that handles credit cards / payments. It's one of the (many) requirements for getting an industry standard certification (like PCIDSS / MPOC). The app Must block screenshots, and Must disable the camera while using it...

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What on earth are those in charge of certification standards thinking they'll achieve with requirements like this?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's probably to stop third party apps from screenshoting the banking app.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago

The same functionality that you use to take screenshots can be hijacked by bad actors to get access to your stuff. It's especially bad if they can see your MFA apps or other sensitive info.

Not saying the functionality is always used for the best of intentions, but there are many situations where I see it as necessary.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's nothing. My workplace disabled copy/paste on everyone's work iPhones completely. Not in their own apps but system wide. Apparently that's something ios allows them to do. Doesn't affect me much because I use the phone as a glorified dual auth token but some people have it as their primary phone.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

work iPhones

some people have it as their primary phone.

Bruh, I have no idea how people can put up with their employer being able control their device. Like... the employer can freak out about some perceived "security breach" and decide to wipe everyone's phone and you lose all your data like photos. Also, their employer can see if they are shit talking about the employer or mangement people, and it's a terrible idea if they want to unionize.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like that it's possible, but I think it should be treated like a permission with a user accessible toggle in settings for each app.

[–] FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I would like to see the same thing for clipboard read access. In the same way app has to prompt you for location permission it would have to prompt you to read the clipboard and you would actually have the option to allow it all the time which is handy for some apps like clipboard manager, or don't allow it alltogether which is handy for some random apps you don't trust.

[–] felsiq@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s a really good feature imo and I’d love to see it be more common. This is how iOS does it:

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Aaaah! I'm so frustrated by this BS. Its MY phone. It should be MY choice.

Switching to GrapheneOS soon, and if the bank app(s) don't work, too bad. I'll use a (Linux) computer.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone.

Is it your phone though?

🙃

It should be, but the reality is that is isn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Delusion6903@discuss.online 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I hate this "feature" of the Dexcom GCM app. They seem to believe that HIPPA law prevents me from sharing my glucose readings with anyone I choose to.

To send readings to people, I can't screenshot the app but I can screenshot the notification which contains the same info 🤷🏼

[–] codapine@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Yep, same with the-shitty ass Kaiser Permanente app, which itself is just a webview wrapper around the crappy kp.org website. I cannot screenshot my test results, or any other screen within the app, but I can go to the same-ass page in my browser and take my screenshot from the website.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] huginn@feddit.it 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

iPhone absolutely has this concept

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kipo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

I agree that it's infuriating! I downloaded an LSPosed module called CaptureSposed that overrides it.

It shouldn't take a specific module hack on a rooted phone with a custom OS with an unlocked bootloader to get this functionality back.

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Soooo... Any Magisk module that allows one to bypass this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I get banking and financial apps doing it. But shopping apps yea, wish we had a permissions override

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen public transportation apps doing that to curb sharing the ticket/barcode with someone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›