this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
322 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
6385 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 130 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The laws of robotics:

  1. A robot shall never harm a human, or through inaction allow a human to come to harm.
  2. Fuck other robots though. Fuck them right up.
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First glance I thought that was One Must Fall: 2097, but turns out below it doesn't even get close to that epic level.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

To be fair, given its legacy now as one of the worst one-on-one fighting games in the history of the universe, Rise of the Robots probably wishes it was One Must Fall.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, that reminds me I wanted to replay that game.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 93 points 1 week ago (5 children)

As it turns out, the impact wasn't too severe. The Waymo cab, to its credit, hit the brakes immediately and avoided knocking the poor little thing over. And moments later, while the robotaxi is still in a daze, the Serve robot drives away like nothing happened.

Smash seems to be overselling it.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They had hot, angry robot sex afterward

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For revenge or for reconciliation?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago
[–] RCTreeFiddy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

It appears the video may have been sped up in the part just before the impact. I would like to see the unedited clip, I bet it was way less severe than it looked.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good time to use the word "bump"

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe even "boop".

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

The word "slam" has been reserved for headlines of someone giving minor criticism, can't use that unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

Yes!

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

Oh no

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about if we had sixteen different proprietary such protocols instead?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We’d need a seventeenth unifying protocol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Little robot crossed against the signal, and couldn't navigate the curb, big robot cali rolled the right turn and didn't yield to the pedestrian walk way. What a shit show. Glad it wasn't someone in a wheel chair.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So what we're saying is, this is it, folks. We've finally reached robot parity with exactly how humans would behave in the same situation.

Not quite.

We'd need the waymo cab to start screaming about how the robot just jumped right out in front of it, and how they should stay the hell out of the way.

Then we'll have reached parity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

and didn't yield to the pedestrian walk way.

The Waymo is guilty.

The scene was clearly visible and it hit the brake much too late at that speed.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

video of it on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hazFkED40KI if you don't want to go to reddit through the linked page

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't really want to go to YouTube either, but thank you.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah everyone knows the best crash videos are on liveleak

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valorie12@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Begun, the robot wars have.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

You call that a smash? Stop sensationalising, come now.

A car gently tapped a thing during a turn and came to a stop.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

The future is now!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 15 points 1 week ago

We'll win the robot wars by pitting them against each other.

[–] Lemminnewbie2@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

I hate seeing this kind of bot on bot crime

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Where were you during the robot wars of 2025?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I see nobody talking about this, but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

It seems like this is just something that'll probably happen a lot whenever something new is introduced on the roads.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know about the equipment of Waymo cars, but I would be surprised if they didn't have LIDARs or some other form of distance based environment detection.

And that should be sufficient to implement basic obstacle detection. You don't need to use machine learning if you can use sensors telling you that "something is too close".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BritishJ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, they should try to avoid any object in the road to be honest. Imagine a new toy comes out that a child is on. Sorry we killed that child l, we didn't train it on that new toy.

Its just an unacceptable answer to be honest.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That is also very true.

It's not a Tesla so I'm sure they are investigating the cause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Expect reCaptcha to ask you to identify food delivery robots soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

You can say that about nearly 100% of humans as well.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So I'm finding it hard to find a release date for humans, but I'm fairly sure they predated the invention of self-driving cars.

For example I seem to remember being alive in the 1990s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

This new season of Robot Wars / Battle Bots is starting strong

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

The shadow wars

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago

That was personal, there's definitely some beef between them.

[–] hmancuso@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every robot should have some kind of electronic blinker to let others know they're robots. That way, we can avoid a bunch of bumps and crashes.

[–] the_ocs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›