this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
222 points (99.6% liked)

politics

24763 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota House Democrats boycotted the legislative session, denying Republicans the quorum needed to act on their temporary 67-66 majority after a Democrat was disqualified.

The boycott, triggered by GOP plans to ignore a court ruling and refuse to seat a Democrat, aims to prevent what Democrats call "unprecedented abuse of power."

Republicans proceeded with their agenda, disputing the quorum requirement.

The standoff, potentially leading to lawsuits, mirrors similar partisan walkouts in other states.

A special election in two weeks may restore the chamber's tie.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 116 points 6 months ago (2 children)

GOP plans to ignore a court ruling and refuse to seat a Democrat

...and...

Republicans proceeded with their agenda, disputing the quorum requirement.

“If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. The will reject democracy.” - David Frum

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand how Democrats can continue to fail to learn this lesson.

Democrats are trying to play by the rules.

Republicans are playing to win by any means necessary.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Republicans believe they can flout the law with impunity. Democrats refuse to teach the lesson that destroying the Rule of Law harms the Republicans too, by treating them as the literal outlaws they are.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What are Dems supposed to do here exactly that they're not already doing. Please elaborate with specifics because I am very very tired of comments like this without any specific critiques. The title isn't reflecting what they are doing. They aren't boycotting, they are specifically trying to block republicans from doing anything until the special election where the chamber will become tied

They are already getting in the mud a bit here by trying to stop the session until the special election. They have made a lot of moves here to block Republicans. They swore in dems early so that they could block quorum and they did so in secret to catch Republicans off gaurd, Gov Tim Walz called the special election as soon as possible despite republicans trying to push the date further out, they had the Democratic secretary of state declare no quorum was met so that they have great merit for legal challenges if republicans try and ignore the law, etc.

Edit: also the Minnesota Secretary of State just came out and said they intend to file suit to challange Republicans ignoring his declaration of no quorum and adjournment

https://www.sos.state.mn.us/about-the-office/news-room/secretary-simon-statement-on-opening-session-of-the-minnesota-house-of-representatives/

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

What do they need to file suit for? The session was adjourned. No business could happen. It holds as much sway as if I waltzed into the chambers and held a vote declaring myself speaker. They should ignore it until a proper vote can happen.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

I fucking hate conservatives, man

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 48 points 6 months ago

Republicans proceeded with their agenda, disputing the quorum requirement.

To the surprise of no one. This is likely them dipping their toes in the water to see what happens if they decide to just ignore the rules within a legislative body. Will anyone actually stop them? Will the courts care? If the answer to both is "no", then try it in a few other states and if all goes well, you know that no one will likely interfere at a federal level either.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Unprecedented abuse of power

Must be a day that ends in 'Y'

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Don't worry, the government has safeguards against fascism."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Nooooooooo Dems are terrible and the same as republiQans!1! The non-voters have spoken (but not voted)!