this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
521 points (89.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
283 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Watched Louis Rossman today, and he's part of the team behind a new app for watching online video content - not just youtube, but nebula, peertube, twitch and more.

adblock already integrated, works amazingly with a quick test on my end - it's an app in the Lemmy spirit

(it's got a paid model similar to winrar, you don't have to pay - but they do want you to - opensource and all)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago (10 children)

basically Newpipe but only source available, not really free software or open source, so they are restricting your freedoms.

Just keep using Newpipe instead.

[–] LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It is open source but you can't publish modified code (this is to ensure there will be no malicious forks like there was with newpipe)

plus you missed the entire point:

... app for watching online video content - not just youtube, but nebula, peertube, twitch and more.

It's an app that allows you to watch the same creators across many platforms

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That’s not the problem. The question is, stopping actors that put ads and paywalls behind modified source, which technically isn’t malicious, it’s just being a jerk and this licensing makes it much easier to take down. Ofc, if he actually wanted it to be open source, he’d just force all derivatives to be non commercial.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] figaro@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, at least in this case he can take down fake copies from the most popular app stores. That mitigates the reach of malicious clones a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lukas@lemmy.haigner.me 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

FUTO Temporary License (FTL) violates the following open-source principles:

  • Open source licenses must allow free redistribution. FTL allows license suspension and termination at any time, without notice, for any or no reason.
  • Open source licenses must allow source code distribution. FTL allows restrictions to access the code at any time, without notice, for any or no reason.
  • Open source licenses must allow modifications. FTL allows modifications only for non-commercial use, or maybe not even that. FTL dodges the word modifications here, no clue.
  • Open source licenses must explicitly allow distribution of software built from modified source code. FTL forbids distribution of software built from modified source code for commercial use.
  • Open source licenses must not discriminate against persons/groups and fields of endeavor. FTL allows license suspension and termination at any time, without notice, for any or no reason.

The FTL enables the following practices:

  • Copyright holders can change the license terms.
  • Copyright holders can re-license everything.
  • Copyright holders can target specific groups and individuals with discriminatory license terms.
  • Copyright holders can close source everything.
  • Copyright holders can forbid specific groups and individuals from using their work.
[–] Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Wow, this is a high quality comment.

I guess it's understandable to be concerned about licensing when putting money and work into a project like this, but I still hope they change their mind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

The term "open source" generally refers to the definition by the Open Source Initiative.

https://opensource.org/osd/

Not allowing publishing of modified source code is in violation with the criteria of open source.

[–] 520@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It is open source but you can’t publish modified code (this is to ensure there will be no malicious forks like there was with newpipe)

  1. that is not open source. That is source available.

  2. because we all know that license agreements are a line that trojan distributors will not cross. Not malware distribution, not hacking laws, but copyright infringement. They'd never do that at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I could not find a link to the source on the website 🤔 do you know where the source is?

Edit: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is an interesting project, not sure where it goes. The title is deeply misleading though. The features of ReVanced make YouTube so much better, whereas this project doesn't seem to be about making YouTube better so much as circumnavigating YouTube for the comment boxes and as your hub to creators. They seem to be doing different things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, I really want to be optimistic about this project. I love that it integrates multiple sources, that it lets you use different identities that are not attached to any of these services. I installed it and already paid for it even, because I love initiatives like this.

I think it's unsustainable. In 5 years, everyone who'd use the app's already paid for it, which means the devs have no incentive to continue to work, and funding dries up. When that happens, they'll of course just let the app run until the plugins stop working. Nobody will be able to pick it up and continue development in an open forum because it's not FLOSS.

My hope is they re-license it under a copyleft license later, but I'm not optimistic about that happening. With how things are now, it does appear to be doomed to enshittification.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah FOSS or FLOSS (your teeth ^^) is the only viable solution we have found that really works. It's like Democracy IMO, criticize them all you want but that's the only ones that works over time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Meltrax@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

ReVanced taps into my history with microg. When I watch stuff on desktop with Firefox and uBlock Origin, I want those videos to show as watched on my phone when I open ReVanced so I don't get recommended the same stuff. That works.

GrayJay can't do this. It's not better. It's a good idea, but it's a side grade.

[–] protput@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I just want Smarttube Next for mobile.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As lemann pointed out there's a setting for that in the YT add-on im the sources tab, not the app settings. Also myself and others have had loading issues with Revanced. It'll start playing, suddenly start buffering and never stops. Grayjay works as it should and still has the settings I want from Revanced. Not to argue, just want to let others in my situation know Grayjay is the upgrade we need.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blueneonz@reddthat.com 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tried it out a bit. I Ike the idea of the app being basically an rss read for video platforms. This is great for not having a bunch of apps (twitch app/Xtra for twitch and YT app/Newpipe/skytube/etc. for YT.) A user profile and allowing app comments are nice to have on the app.

However, I'm worried about what Rossmann says in regards to profit and maintenance. The app is moderated/worked-on by (I think paid) professionals and we should pay a license of $9.99 yet the app is also unprofitable and may never turn a profit. So, what's the point in paying for the app?

Rossmann has a millionaire backing up his repair business among other things. So, is some of this being funded by that person and other investors of FUTO or is our money the only thing keeping this afloat? How are these workers getting paid if it's a one time payment and the money is uncertain? How is the platform going to stay up and pay fair wages? The app is niche and I can't see too many people paying for a license. I also can't see too many workers staying unless they are passionate. Something isn't adding up unless I'm wrong.

[–] LocustOfControl@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of projects that take donations/payments that don't make profit but stay afloat, normally through the team behind it paying the bills. I guess it depends what the running costs actually are, and if it's for people or e.g. servers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It sounds interesting, but... Android only? I don't actually watch much video on my phone. It's mostly on my desktop browser.

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not optimal, but using Waydroid on Linux, Android apps feel almost like they run natively (no need to start a emulator manually).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MakerThe11@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wouldn't classify it as a better revanced, but that doesn't matter, thanks for sharing this awesome tool I really liked it, I first started incorporating Matrix in my life, then a couple days ago Lemmy, and now this, it's great

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CausticFlames@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago

I just bought the FUTO voice input app as well from them and it's genuinely amazing. It has punctuation where it needs to. It cuts out all the UM's. And the best part is, I don't have to pretend that I'm talking to a robot. I can just speak as if I'm talking to a normal person and it gets it right nearly every single time. It is so worth the $5.

This entire comment was typed with it, and I did not edit a single thing.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's not enough to make work around for YouTube. We need a new YouTube.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but with the ability to combine all competitors in a single feed a significant hurdle has been removed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He talked about saving videos from being deleted when you lose one of your accounts, so it's in the works

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

that's literally the whole point of this?

the point of this is a new youtube is unlikely to take off because people can't start using it without missing all their regular content.

this means you can keep all your regular content and add new sources, with the same creators, which means they can start to move to new platforms and take their followers. that's how we'll replace youtube.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] Knocturnal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wdym by bypass and those files ? I am sorry, but do you mean u need to edit something, delete or overwrite ?

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is there SponserBlock support?

If it supported both SponserBlock and DeArrow I'd switch in a heartbeat. Until then I'll stick to ReVanced.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pixelologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was excited about this but it's mobile only?

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

With how locked down mobile is compared to desktop I think it's a good thing to start with mobile

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sadly it's for the large part the recommendation algorithm that I'm on YouTube for. Most of the videos I watch are from people I'm not subscribed to.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I've always wondered if people like you existed! Fascinating.

Not criticizing you, just personally I don't want any recommendation algos in any of my media.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah people have mixed opinions about that, but atleast in my case YouTube's recommendations does a really good job at finding content I'm interested in. It just needs some training for it to do a good job. When there's something I'm not interested in, I just flag it as "not interested" and then that stuff dissapears and is replaced with something else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't agree, you need a way to discover new stuff (akin to going to /all). What I do hate is how they don't give you the option to do anything but that. Or they give the option but it's incredibly annoying so you don't use it. Like you can't trust YouTube to show you the content from the people you're subscribed to. You can't trust them to even show their content on the homepage of the channel if you want to be sure you didn't miss anything interesting you have to go channel by channel clicking in the videos and live tabs for anything the algorithm might deem not worthy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The issue with all this is the general architecture of the internet, web browsers and programming languages and such aren't going to fundamental change just because Google needs to see more ad revenue.

The harder they try to stick with this method of profiteering the harder the push back will be. There will always be ad block as long as there are ads.

All they're doing is showing their cards and setting themselves up for defeat!

[–] Lobo6780@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like libretube pretty interface and you can login to piped instance to sync your subs and playlists all without Google account.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›