this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
432 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

81871 readers
4832 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix confirms it is increasing subscription prices, again, after adding 8.8 million customers::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 98 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Who cares though, right? We all unsubscribed from that useless streaming service, right?

[–] TheYear2525@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

I mean yeah I suspect most people on Lemmy have. But we’re outliers.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still get it as part of my phone plan, and hardly ever use it. They’ve conditioned me to not ever get interested in a Netflix show until there’s at least 4 seasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Sure did. They still email me about shit to watch. Dunno why I thought that would stop on its own.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I thought I did. I can't even log into Netflix as they say I don't have an account, and yet my PayPal history is showing I've been paying them continuously...

How the fuck can they charge me for an account that doesn't exist!? I just cancelled it today through PayPal, hopefully that stops it. It's absolutely absurd.

[–] gogosempai@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Currently costs peanuts in India (have some good friends over there 🥸) and there's no password sharing crackdown yet. Comes down to $2 per person on the highest plan. As long as this continues, I'll stay subbed to Netflix.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's like the only one that works natively on my mom's TV so that's all she watches 🤷

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 96 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The prices of Netflix's $6.99 ad-supported plan and the $15.49 Standard tier remain unchanged.

I wouldn't be surprised if they crunched the numbers and realized adverters are desperate for a new place to show ads now that cable is basically dead.

They'll keep raising the prices of ad free hoping people move to the ad supported tier.

If you're ad free, Netflix makes the most profit when you never open it, and may even lose money if you're always streaming something.

On ad plans, they'll keep making money the more people watch. There's no "tipping point" where profits go down the more someone watches.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Spot on. I expect within five or six years most streaming services will have priced ad-free plans out of the average person's budget and then they'll drop them entirely, citing a lack of consumer demand. There's way more money to be made through cablefication.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There’s way more money to be made through cablefication.

I mean. Supposedly.

But then again, cable is dead for a reason.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I mean. Supposedly.

But then again, cable is dead for a reason.

Yes, and the reason cable is dead is specifically because streaming offered a more affordable, convenient, and ad-free option. Now that it's pretty much the only legal game in town and every greedy fuck out there is trying to start their own streaming service the cablefication is well underway. You think the c-suite types give a single fuck about the long-term viability of their services? lol no. They're here for short term profits. They'll be carried off into the sunset by their golden parachute while you're paying $45/mo to watch commericals on Netflix.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (10 children)

You think the c-suite types give a single fuck about the long-term viability of their services? lol no

This is the madness. It really speaks to the emptiness that underlies whatever we call the philosophy that results in this kind of decision making. Modern MBA cult? Neo-liberalism?

Christ, stop buying businesses just to break them people.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Not my money. Piracy is easier at this point anyway. Or God forbid I get a hobby or go outside.

I'd seriously rather watch paint dry than watch commercials.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If you have more than two streaming services it now cost more than cable.

We've come full circle, guys!

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m not sure which streaming services you mean but cable back when I had it YEARS ago was over $120 a month. That was just the tv part, not including internet.

I can’t think of 3 streaming services that come near that price.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're getting there. At one time TV was $40/month

[–] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And now my basic Internet connection from the only provider in the area (who is also the TV provider) is $100/mo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Still way better than cable

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

At least for now we don't have to watch ads....

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Only if you’re counting YouTubeTV as one of those and even still, I remember my dad arguing with dish or direct about the $150 bill all the time over a decade ago. We switched cable providers every other year to keep the price in the low $100 range and as soon as the honeymoon period was over they would double it.

Even YouTubeTV+Netflix+Disney+w/e is less than cable for now

[–] online@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The cost of cable where I can choose what I want to watch when I want to watch it. Whereas before I had to hope that the programming directors for the different channels picked something somewhere worth watching when I turned on the tube.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man. So glad NAS is in my computer toy budget next year

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum.

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

lmao hivemind with their finger on the pulse again. 8.8 million users added following the "mass exodus"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] RoseRose56@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Milk the cows 🐄

[–] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Its so boring rn tho

[–] Abhijeet@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Another reason for piracy

load more comments
view more: next ›