this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1091 points (97.5% liked)

politics

20632 readers
3697 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 21 points 13 hours ago

I'd vote for him but he'd need to ignore the consultants next time if he wants any hope of winning.

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm hoping Zelensky will run for US president after strong Dien in Ukraine. You might be thinking that someone from another country can't be president. Well.... looks at current situation in White House At least this one would be elected.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think we need to go with the Zelensky model (comedian-turned-politician) rather than Zelensky proper. My money's on Jon Stewart and/or Bill Burr.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Burr would be a good choice. I hate to lean hard into identity politics here, but a blue collar aesthetic cishet white guy seems to have a better chance of winning so long as he's progressive.

Dems have been thinking of it backwards. The center wants vibes, the left wants policies.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hopefully this time they don't muzzle him. Tim's a great example of dem policies working,

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Can you please just fucking not

We need someone who is actually going to make some changes, not another return to a milque toast centre right 70 year old white dude

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

Except, before the DNC reeled him in with kamala's campaign, he regularly had excellent policy and progressive stances that would shake the middlest of middle right Dems. Things like free school lunches and gender affirming care and reproductive health care protections from the federal government. I would take him over Kamala any day to be quite honest.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Would have wanted him as president nominee either way, hope he gets it. The name Tim Walz is a name that needs to go down in history with the title "saviour of the US" or smth like that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

"Run for president in 2028" XD That ship has sailed. I don't think they will have any more elections.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Even North Korea has elections. They might not be fair but they will be held.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I guess I’m the only one against this idea. I’m not keen on candidates that have already lost running again. Get someone else up there to try.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

Ehh, nixing peoples' chances because of a failed run doesn't really lead to better candidates IMO. You can only learn so much from others' mistakes. Beyond that, his part was really second fiddle to Candidate Harris's campaign.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

He lost a VP bid. That's different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Please do it

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago

It's cute that they think there's gonna be another election.

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (10 children)

Oh yes, please, older people, maybe I'll have my late great grandma run a campaign for the democrats from her grave.

Edit: not that I prefer a republican after trump. I'm certainly not far right. But I'm tired of seeing running leaders being this old. Can you americans get AOC to run for once?

[–] RiceBowl@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 hours ago

She only just became eligible.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

wha? I thought it was known that walz was actually pretty young (60) compared to how he looks lol. Definitely on the older side of average age for president looking at the stats, but he's 2 years younger than jon stewart and even gavin newsom is 57.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 82 points 23 hours ago (24 children)

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I saw a video of him sitting down to have an earnest conversation with hardcore Trump farmers and they left liking him a lot. He's got that "common sense" Midwestern energy on lock and I can see him gaining a lot of ground with the blue collar and rural folks because of it.

If he has pro-hunting gun views like Bernie, he'll be an amazing pick.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago

I think he hunts himself. Didn’t he say that during the campaign with Harris?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Running Hillary again

The fact that this is somewhat believable is so stupid

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›