this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1076 points (97.5% liked)

politics

20632 readers
3761 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Walz Buttigieg or the other way around.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

its march 4th. i say we stop voting for seniors over the retirement age.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 33 minutes ago

he should. he was a great pick and far more left than america deserved. he and aoc would be great as a ticket.

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, let's keep alive the existence of Walz's couple of misstatements, while ignoring the insane, senile nonsense that Trump spews on the hour. Fuck the media.

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

I think it’s important to work towards enabling more political parties between now and 2028. We need alternative voting systems like Alaska and Maine have, but in the other states as well. That is only really possibly through getting ballot initiatives passed in each state for something like STAR Voting, Ranked Robin Voting, Score Voting, or Ranked Choice Voting.

A different voting system enables us to move away from First Past the Post, which is what forces a two party system. By having this, there can be more smaller parties that more truly represent the values of each state that can work with the bigger parties. Plus, it opens up the door for the most liked candidates to not knock each other out over the least liked candidates when tallying the votes.

All that is needed in about half of the states is to get signatures to put ballot initiatives up for a vote. Through grassroots action we can make a meaningful difference, and get more politicians like Walz that actually care about us in office.

[–] Waffle@infosec.pub 4 points 2 hours ago

Please fucking God no. It's like they actually want Republicans to win.

[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

When will the DNC pull their heads out of their asses? If they won’t put forth any serious candidates, why bother?

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Oh, so we're cool with losing again? He's not going to swing any demographic group - it's gonna be the same result.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Loser says what?

Nobody associated with the Harris-Walz campaign should have anything the fuck to do with 2028 presidential campaigns. They should all be too embarrassed to ever show their faces again.

AOC should be the candidate. Nobody to the right of AOC should even fucking bother with the primary, even if that describes 95% of the Democratic Party.

[–] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

Canadian here, I agree. Y’all need to scorched earth most of the DNC and have a true party for the people.

[–] DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world 33 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's cute that he thinks there will be an election in 2028, or ever again, for that matter.

[–] Resand@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ohh, there's probably be an election. Keeping up appearances and all that.

Don't think he'll be allowed to run tho.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He'll probably be allowed to run, but just enough of his votes would mysteriously disappear to swing the election.

[–] Master@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWSWqn7UHYM

And they wont even try to hide it because no one will stop them.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 39 points 8 hours ago

Bold of him to assume there will be elections in 2028.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

He was the better half of the ticket.

[–] kiwii4k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

while this is true, it would still be a total loss to run him

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

I'm worried that despite having very good views himself that he is going to be tainted by the past. Not without reason too, because the consultants made him stand down with the "weird" insult and progressive messaging. Like most of these people, if it's not their authentic campaign, then whose is it? He's demonstrated, like most people who reach a moment in their career to seriously consider this, that he's too malleable for populist politics. It's possible that he completely sheds that team and runs his own, but who here really thinks that's going to happen? I'd believe it if we had AOC for VP. The pressure to succumb to inferior messaging is higher than it'll ever be during a presidential campaign, I don't really trust anyone to stay firm except AOC, Talib, and Bernie because they have demonstrated resistance in this sort of high pressure consultant environment.

[–] knightmare1147@lemmy.world 51 points 10 hours ago (11 children)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Bernie is too old and he knows it. He's not gonna run. AOC has a pretty bad favorable to unfavorable ratio nationally. That's not automatically disqualifying; numbers aren't set in stone, and a lot could change between now and 2028, but she's not starting from the same place of broad appeal that Sanders did. As much as I love both of them, we need to look beyond the same two people for progressive candidates.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago

Bernie's going to be almost 90 years old by then

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

Governor Walz, we need you protecting Minnesota as you have been. While you possibly being president would be the boost of democracy this country needs, my opinion is that you hold the fort exactly where you are.

load more comments
view more: next ›