So weird. SpaceX's competition? Getting attacked by little d and fElon?
Who could have imagined?
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
351 points (99.4% liked)
politics
21589 readers
4228 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not really competition anymore though, since they often use SpaceX rockets for what they do now.
They were never competition, exactly. NASA doesn't make spacecraft, they buy and sometimes modify them from industrial concerns and always have.
What they did do was be a federal space agency, with all that implies otherwise, which means a private company can't charge premium rates to do the things that absolutely have to happen that they were doing.
This is the privatization and militarization (through the inevitability of Space Force absorbing some responsibility) of space.
A Republican voter told me Trump would be thrown out of office if America loses the space race to China. Whenever I need a half-correct monkey paw fortuneteller, I guess I know where to find one.
The US is gonna be so humiliated when China lands people on the moon and we have no infrastructure or tech in place to answer their move.
We'll be sending the first live person to Venus and it will be our greatest hero, Elon Trump! We will show China what can be done when there's a will.
I fully support Musk and Trump landing on the surface of venus
It could be a surprise! We tell them they're just going for a quick moon landing but then a little Boeing later...uhhh ahhh! They become the first two people to land on Venus. Probably less uhh and more ahhhhh!
Honestly, I'd volunteer to be the first person to land on Venus. I know it's a straight up death sentence, but what a cool way to go.
Okay so 3 people! Excellent! We must make arrangements right away! Valla von dios!
We know it's safe, because the greenhouse effect is a liberal lie.
The US is already humiliated
We currently have no one meeting this head on with real leadership. Anyone with political capital to travel and speak with world leaders (as trump did when he wasn’t president) could be helping save this YET.
America is so deeply fucked, and 70-something million of them are too brainwashed to know it yet.
Another eighty million are too lazy to care.
And the remainder of us who are somewhat higher on the spectrum of both sanity and giving a fuck about humans and the world are losing our fucking minds at a distressing pace
So, is SpaceX just going to do all the infrastructure? Because this is just royally dumb.
Yup, and they'll do it half as well for three times the cost.
Efficiency!
Rocket lab will be putting hands up and competing for some of the contracts
This deeply pisses me off. You have no idea how excited I am to go back to the moon and if that goes down the drain imma lose it.
They are absolutely gonna kill the Artemis project. They already killed the launch vehicle (though, to be fair, SLS was an absolute albatross).
I'm super worried about JWST... It's been absolutely amazing so far, and that fucker might just fucking axe it.
JWST is fine. It's not going anywhere, and unless it is purposefully destroyed it will keep sending us data.
The NASA Deep Space Network collects it and distributes it, but Europe could just as easily set up their own interface to receive the data. DSN was already in place, so it made sense to keep using it.
2 out of the 3 DSN locations aren't even in the US or managed by NASA.
- NASA manages the Goldstone complex in California
- The Madrid complex is in Spain and managed by their national space agency
- The Canberra complex is in Australia and managed by their national space agency
Also, fun fact, the Canberra complex has the only antenna that can communicate with Voyager 2!
I mean, it’s already up there and there’s no docking port for future service missions.
A lot of countries contributed to JWST, if the US drops it, someone else will pay people to keep it in orbit.
Trump's? Or Musk's?
From the article ...
NASA announced on Monday that it will be closing the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy; the Office of the Chief Scientist; and the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) Branch of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Twenty-three employees will be affected by the cuts,
The title only claims that the process has started.
The title only claims that the process has started.
The article says "will be" (future tense), and not "has been so far". 🤷♂️
There may be more to come (knowing Elon/Trump), but I can only quote the article, ethically.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
You seemed to imply with your bolded quote that this was inconsequential, so I only mean to point out that according to the title of the article that the attacks on NASA have started in a concrete way, not merely speculative anymore.
You seemed to imply with your bolded quote that this was inconsequential,
No, was just highlighting the quantity of employees. People usually like to know how many are involved.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
Oh! Oh! Can Canada get its aerospace engineers and industry back? We've been missing them ever since the Avro Arrow project got cancelled by American pressure and they all ended up in NASA.
I would fucking love that. I find it unlikely but I really want to work in space manufacturing without moving to the USA. I know there are a handful of companies here, but not enough.
“It’s one small step backwards for man, it’s”, scans notes looking for last section of speech. Shrugs. “I think that’s it folks. One small step backwards it is.”
The race to the bottom!
Wait, weren't they going to take humanity into space?
Science Mission Directorate cut by 50%?
It's not the people building the rockets getting cut the most.
It's the people studying the planets and responsible for understanding and protecting their state before human development s'encubre.
Yes and it covers way more missions than most people would think, like the Mars rovers, all of our sample return efforts, etc. It would all but kill US planetary science.
Changing our space program from that of scientific exploration and understanding our neighbors to one of colonization and conquest.