this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
344 points (99.7% liked)

politics

21739 readers
5667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NRBQ@lemmy.studio 2 points 8 hours ago

Guess I can tip that barrel of mercury I've had in my garage into the drain without repercussion now. Thanks everyone!

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

I love the taste of dioxin in my tap water!

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Should rename it to EDA( Environmental Destruction Agency).

Or Environmental Freedom Force for short.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Or "The Gulf of America"

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago

And the shareholders applauded like there was no tomorrow, and they were right.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

[–] JHD@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

They need to change their name to Environment Destruction Agency.

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (5 children)

One of my close friends got her doctorate last year and recently hired as a scientist at EPA. She is improving methods of surveying urban soils using remote methods like ground penetrating radar, this helps to inform landowners/potential developers the true conditions of the soil they are building on. A shame the government doesn’t think that’s important anymore.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She is improving methods of surveying urban soils

Correction, she was.

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

She hasn’t been layed off yet but, yea, only a matter of time…

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like woke DEI garbage. Everyone knows plants need Brawndo, the Thirst Mutilator. It’s got what plants crave.

[–] wynn@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

It's got electrolytes...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The government is being run by the sorts of people who are doing the illegal dumping of hazardous waste that your EPA friend is trying to detect. Of course they don't want her to do it; they don't want to be held accountable!

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Yea I get that, and explaining its usefulness will fall on deaf GOP ears, but for the record It’s not even hazardous waste…it’s the urban soils that tend to have a lot of organic carbon content from all the living shit and garbage used as backfill especially in east coast cities. Standard protocols for direct soil sampling don’t consider carbon as much as they should and also remote methods (like GPR) don’t measure total organic carbon. Not high stakes research but important to get a full picture of the soils on a building site.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

A shame the government doesn’t think that’s important anymore.

Not just unimportant, sand in the gears of their capitalist steamroller. The true conditions of anything must not interfere with the advertised conditions.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

and also the funding on research in general is going out the window, making people trying to enter stem industries all that unlikely. when its already very hard to enter stems as it is.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (28 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters. Congratulations!

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

To us non-Americans this is a really bad look. Did you really do everything you could to prevent this? Anyway, we’re all here and we all have to deal with it now. And really, you / we didn’t start this. The wheels were already set in motion before most of our time. Fascism is the inevitable outcome of capitalism. But we must be the ones to take action and set things right and build a better world.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I assume everything they will roll back is preventing companies from making more money.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Only select companies, and only In the short term. In the medium to long term it won't help them.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Yeah, we know this chemical causes hypercancer but if we can put it in our food, it'll save 13¢/ton. Can ya give me a quick ol authorization there, guy?"

It's not always about the cost saving. Sometimes it's just because it gets more customers! Brominated flour, as an example.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I want to know if these people truly don't believe in climate change or they know it's so bad already that nothing can reverse it... and just don't care.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think you are overthinking it. They don't even have climate change in their considerations, they are solely focused on the short term profits corporations can make from dismantling government regulations. That is how corporate cleptocracy works.

[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

They think/know they’ll be rich enough to avoid the negative problems climate change will present, or they’ll be dead before it happens. They’re writing checks that the rest us will have to cash and laughing at us as we cheer for them to do so.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What do the letters stand for then?

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Enterprise Protection Agency

[–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

Extraction of Profits Agency

[–] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

Environmental Putrification Agency

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Enshitification Policy Agency

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Incase anyone out of the know about the head of EPA: Trump Ally, Ass-Kisser, Defending the shithead during the first impeachment hearing and sworn in after being selected by Trump. There you go.

Now you can not be surprised anymore.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He also went to the same highschool as I did. Of 900 kids in my graduating class 450 actually graduated...

Nothing good comes from that school, myself included lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Geez I hope somebody doesn’t whip out some amendment or other and explain things to this man in a way he’ll be sure to comprehend.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the majority of those amendment guys are on his side cheering him on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›