this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
686 points (99.7% liked)

politics

22146 readers
4961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sec. 2. Closing the Department of Education and Returning Authority to the States. (a) The Secretary of Education shall, to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities while ensuring the effective and uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

So I assume all the special ed money in Red states will now just go into a slush fund to accelerate executions, and an amplification of attacks on marginalized groups instead of helping kids/families.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 days ago (10 children)

But he needs Congressional approval to do so.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 33 points 2 days ago

Pretending that the old rules still apply is how Empires fall.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

My God, this is beyond sad.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Was on the radio, some notes:

  1. The responsibility of FAFSA (which is 2/3 of it's budget) likely goes to Treasury and honestly I don't think they can realistically pull that back legally, at least anytime soon. Disability funds supposedly will move somewhere too.

  2. The DoE itself likely will exist in the same limbo as USAID since legally it requires Congress, and judges can and will challenge illegal moves. That said, I say limbo because USAID may have got people back but empty buildings and ongoing stuff is ruined. Expect that from DoE, even though it shouldn't be allowed.

My own info, though, is they only provide public schools about 5 to 10% budget on average, and yes, it's heavily towards rural districts. This likely will have very little impact on blue states, although don't go celebrating as budgets are already tight in several places and even blue states will cut into education to fund other things like fire relief. Our Blue states are still no where near as good as many European and Asian country educational institutions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mee@reddthat.com 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wow.

I looked at the articles that was expecting for that to happen today, never thought he would actually do it.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Yet more evidence that trump is an agent of Putin and is actively dismantling the United States one piece at a time

[–] ech@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago

What in the past 3 months gave you the impression that it wouldn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This isn't something Trump would even care about. He's being handled very well this time around.

Remember Rick Perry wanted to close the department of Education as well. It's been on the Republican checklist for a while now.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It’s p25.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Well, if you don't live in a city shit is about to get bad. Public education was basically one key thing keeping the US as a first world nation.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Super embarrassing. Fucking idiots and their followers

[–] interested_party@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

HE got by without an education. So can you.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does this mean schools can now give as many trans rights as they want? State rights?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Welp, if the main reason not to is out of fear of losing federal funding...

Seems Trumpy has kind of shot himself in the foot on this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think the practical problems with this are going to be weird. The federal Department of Education is pretty small and doesn’t set as much policy as people assume since that’s 90% done at the state and local level. The college student loan program is a huge component and could theoretically be ruined or just moved to Treasury or HHS or whatever.

The rest is mostly grants to state and local governments and red state politicians are going to be even more pissed than blue if they kill those and put a hole in their budget that has to be filled. (Doesn’t mean they won’t do it but it’s not going to please any governors/legislators.)

The people who will likely suffer most are special ed students since those grants are, obviously, for public schools and private/parochial schools basically never have programs for students with severe, profound, or mild autism. (I don’t know the current terms but when I was in high school, people with, for instance, autism were classified as severe, profound, mild, or moderate based on where they fell on the spectrum. Those terms are probably outdated or were unique to my school system.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think they do something like "soft secession". Instead of breaking the federation apart officially, they're eroding the federation (federal government) to the point where it's no longer relevant. They talk about "state's rights".

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

They're accelerationists. They're burning the system down so they can build their own in its place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This will be in the courts by the end of next week marking it unconstitutional

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

And then nothing will be done about it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›