this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
1119 points (99.0% liked)

News

28181 readers
6540 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Disney shareholders rejected anti-DEI proposal on Thursday.
  • A conservative think tank proposed that Disney stop participating in the Corporate Equality Index.
  • Shareholders for Apple and Costco previously rejected similar proposals.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 305 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They ... rejected ... anti-DEI ... making them ... pro-DEI ... and anti-Trump? Am I getting that right? Sorry, there are just getting to be a lot of double-negatives these days it's hard to keep track.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 163 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, keep with the times!
He isn't not right!

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you meant to say he isn't not unwrong

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Neither of you are incorrect.

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This thread hurts my brain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago

The most accurate takeaway is that the shareholders wish for Disney to continue participating in Diversity Equity and Inclusion measures.

The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shareholders in a company whose entire business is around being well liked globally thinks it would be a bad business move to cancel a program that is part of a good public image in favor of placating a relatively small chunk of Americans that would both be paying attention and against DEI.

They could still be pro-Trump, and not really caring about DEI, but they know the value of optics in the context of a company like Disney.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 189 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Disney wants as many customers as possible and doesn’t care about temporary optics based on hard right politics. Don’t mistake them for the good guys. Megacorps that buy up everything in sight and use their ridiculous piles of money to exert influence over politics are the core of the problem.

Guess why copyright laws in the US kept adding decades and decades to copyright protection from the death of the creator. HINT: Megacorp money controlling laws may have been involved.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 72 points 1 week ago

Like all corporations, Disney is a mercenary. Their allegiance lies with whoever puts the bigger number on their cheque.

If MAGA is going to get in the way of Disney trying to make money, I'm more than happy to let Disney fight that battle and waste some cycles

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

While most of that is true, they actually did let the Mickey Mouse copyright expire, and Mickey as portrayed in Steamboat Willie is now public domain.

But instead they're using trademark. There's a reason they've started using Steamboat Willie in an animated logo.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've got a love/hate thing with Disney. Like...enemy-of-my-enemy-enemy kind of thing.

I do love when they stick it to DeSantis.

But I still ain't going to FL anytime soon. We did Disney in 2022 and I think that's probably near the end of when FL was tolerable (in small doses) for sane people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 118 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Conservatives have been worshipping on the altar of Shareholder Value since the 80's.

Guess what? These shareholders just told us all what they value. Think Conservatives will accept it?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 week ago

Conservative "values" are just cover stories for greed, selfishness and prejudice. They grew up with a set of prejudices and they refuse ever to reexamine them. So they adjust the "values" to suit. Conservatives are incurious, stubborn people who refuse to grow.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean they value money...

and apparently they are smart enough to realize that Diversity helps with money, Which makes sense... they are a machine designed to extract money from people...

rich white billionares do not fill up theatres or make a substantial percentage of disney+ and Hulu subscriptions... a group of people that know how to target different demographics will obviously outperform one that targets the hell out of maga fans but doesn't know how to talk to the other 70% of the country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

worshipping on the altar of Shareholder Value since the 80’s.

Thanks, Milton Friedman...

🙄 🙄 🖕 🖕

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moody@lemmings.world 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just 1% of shareholders voted to approve the proposal

1% of shareholders, or the holders of 1% of shares?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a great fuckin question and one that's probably more important than we realize

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And an easy question to answer - 1% of shares. All businesses weigh shareholder votes by number of shares held.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 75 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Fuck this shit, now I gotta be pro Disney too? I'd gotten so used to hating them. They grew on me a little back when they stood up against DeSantis in Florida too.

I miss the days when we could just love/hate corporations based on their business practices instead of culture war bullshit.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's always more complicated than the binary. Disney might be getting DEI but still forces creators to censor out any LGBT references in their shows, or cancel them if they do them anyway. They still are anti union and work people to the bone.

If you want it simple, no corporation is your friend, ever. They are there simply to take your money, without regard for scruples, and any form of morality they seem to be acting on is either because it will make them more money or it is illegal and not cost effective to break the law.

It's still a good sign the shareholders have some sense in this specific case, but make no mistake, Disney doesn't care about anything other than money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, Disney is still evil. They probably saw how much Target fucked up and don’t want to make the same mistake.

There’s more money in appealing to everyone instead of just white evangelicals Americans.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They have met their fundamental duty as an organization led by human beings who can and should be held to moral standards.

I despise their behavior with copyright but here they've earned the right to not get the "caved to fascists" boycott

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 15 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Their brand of diversity is some bs anyways so you don't have to be pro Disney.

Remember, they gladly took help from a Chinese concentration camp to make their girl boss Mulan remake.

They also fired all their park workers during covid and gave themselves 10 million bonuses while their workers were surviving on food stamps. Some workers had even signed non compete clauses so they literally could not use their talents elsewhere to feed themselves.

Further more, Disneys current version of DEI is divisive, soulless and insincere.

It isn't a black or white situation. You can hate Disney AND MAGA. To me, they are all two sides of the same rotten coin. Ruthless, selfish and greedy people who use others to get ahead and pull the ladder up after themselves.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Stepskippin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, its just more proof that this think tank is shit at making money. Disney doesn't have morals, but it does have a very profitable "princess" marketing strategy. This think tank didn't really read the room very well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zovits@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's almost like there were nuances to almost everything instead of the world being neatly divisible into good and bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)

They saw what happened to Target stocks after the boycott and said fuck that.

Boycotts do work, keep it up

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Probably because they realise that all the companies that ditched DEI have been doing significantly worse. Almost like it's something people want.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (14 children)

It does not even make sense for Disney to be anti-DEI if their target audience is the entire world!

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the Trump admin want them to behave a certain way, and anything different is seen as them being mean, apparently.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Looking forward to that "Failing Disney and nasty, perverted Mickey Mouse, going around in shorts" post on Truth Social. If there's one corporation that might even take Donnie down it's Disney. Kinda like Kong vs Dumbzilla

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No suprise there. A large portion of Disney's viewers are girls and minorities. You know, those dreaded DEI folk.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well yeah they learned that more than just little white girls like their movies. Look at the animated Disney/Pixar feature films, so much more than it was in the pre- renaissance era.

Even during the Renaissance ...we had Pocahontas and Mulan and Jasmine...but these people were more like phoned-in representatives of their cultures compared to now.

Look at Encanto, or Moana/Viana. Or Coco. Or even Soul.

Hell, Strange World features a mixed race family with a queer son and a three-legged dog.

And the movies are better for it. They are more relatable because they aren't all some xeroxed copy of the same plain princess with a slightly different tint. And more importantly, they are showing their young and impressionable viewers a cast that reflects reality. That not every family is a carbon-copy "traditional" family. That different cultures exist and yeah, live a bit differently than suburban white folk (who live a shockingly similar life to the Sultan of Agrabah).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreyAlien@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

This is not about "DEI" it’s about marketing and demographic, in short economic interest, personally i wouldn’t throw them flowers.

[–] Zenodyne@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You are right, but also, I think it’s okay to take the small victories where they are. They shouldn’t have to be applauded for doing the bare minimum, but when this bare minimum is a big middle finger to the administration I’ll look the other way

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

As someone who actually works on real stuff, it's insane to me that for some people, they go to work and have high-level conversations revolving around things such as this.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe that's because "DEI" has become code for "anything done by minorities" and "woke" now means "minorities." With minorites here meaning "not white heterosexual men." Also cis but these snowflakes can't even accept that cisgender is a technical term.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago

"I guess you forgot whose really in charge," said Mickey.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago

Lots of media worried about upsetting the King of America with their reporting

load more comments
view more: next ›