this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
990 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22679 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 1 points 7 minutes ago

AOC has it all. She's progressive, well educated, from a humble background, intelligent and good looking. I am rooting for her but I don't expect the Democratic Party to have a fair primary for that Senate seat.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

People are turning against Chuck "my job is to keep the left pro-Israel" Schumer? Say it ain't so!

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Schumer has already started cozying up to the most important election lobby.

Israel.

Activate AIPAC

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

I’ll be glad to see the back of Corporate DINO Schumer. Though after being booted, he’ll probably regularly show up on Fox News as a token Democrat to criticize anything the government does that helps the people more than the billionaires and corporations.

[–] crazyhotpasta@lemm.ee 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Trump already told U.S citizens that they won't be voting anymore after his election.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 50 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Any poll three years out is worthless bullshit.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I remember a time when the United States actually took a break from reporting on elections instead of manufacturing hype for four solid years between major elections.

The current political media landscape is exhausting, and I'm so sorry to everyone who is young enough to think that constant election projections are "normal."

yeah they do that so it burns people out and they check out

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 14 hours ago

Plenty of time for her "own side" to stab her in the back.

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

I mean the polling shows for the 2036 race has me for the next car. /s

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

For that matter, any action three years out is worthless bullshit.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Primary for what position? What are they running for?

Aren't they both already representatives?

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

People have been pushing her to primary Chuck Schumer for his Senate seat which goes up for election in 2028

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

What does that mean and why is that different from her current role?

[–] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

She is currently in the house as a rep for her district. There are 435 members.

She’s campaigning for the senate to represent the state. There are 100 members, two from each state.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then she can have the voice of 10 million people count for 1 vote. And a Senator from Montana can have the voice of ~5% of that count for the same 1 vote.

Sorry for sounding down about it, we need better senators, but we need to overhaul the way the Senate works

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is why we have both the house of reps and the senate. The house of reps means that states with a high population get adequate representation, and the senate means that states with lower populations can still have a say instead of having no chance of outvoting the high pop states

[–] Razzazzika@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago

Yeah I think thr house and senate are good as they are for that reason. It's the electoral college and gerrymandering districts that are the biggest election problems.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

There are two seperate houses in congress, the house of reps, and the senate. Each state gets a number of reps proportional to its population. But they each get two senators no matter the size of the population. AOC is a rep in the house. Schumer is one of two senators for NY.

A primary election is an election within a party (in this case the democrats, of which they are both members). When he has to run for office again, she (or anyone) can challenge him as the Democratic candidate. If she were to win, then the only other way he could run would be under amother party (or without a party, called an independant).

[–] LetmeLemmy@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 10 hours ago

Good succinct explanation.

Further reading on this type of legislature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameralism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LetmeLemmy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Hypothetical race.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 26 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Don't think I can support anyone running against AOC. She's the best candidate by a country mile.

It's not even that she's so spectacular, it's just the other options are horrendously shit.

Gearing up for the tsunamis of useful idiots though telling me why we need a moderate candidate just like hillary and kamala.

[–] OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

why we need a moderate candidate just like hillary and kamala.

Screw the "don't rock the boat" candidates... unless they're the only option compared to the "let's destroy America!" candidate on the other side.

Not rocking the boat is better than setting the country on fire for no goddamn reason (if the system were burning down with a reasonable expectation we could make it better that'd be arguably different). I'm sure there are plenty that feel smugly superior for having "protested" by not voting, and I trust you don't mind the whole "country's on fire" thing going on (insert "this is fine" meme).

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's a two-pronged strategy.

The lesser-evil candidates piggyback on the greater-evil ones by saying "Hey, at least we're not as bad as that guy!"

It's super effective against useful idiots.

[–] gregs_gumption@lemm.ee -1 points 3 hours ago
[–] andxz@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Not American but from my point of view it looks like you need her more than anything. Her, and preferably many more just like her. Normal intelligent people from all walks of life. Decent human beings.

This is also why I've never had an issue with Elizabeth Warren, not that I want to be shilling for her here. I would've loved to see her get a real chance at the presidency though. While she might be relatively wealthy now she also came from a comparatively normal background, and she seems to remember living it, too (I obviously don't have her voting records in front of my face, but I've read almost everything she's ever written).

Got called a misogynist at Reddit back then for daring to suggest she might be a good candidate, because apparently that's what you are if you think she might have a better temperament than trump..

I digress, though. AOC is awesome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 54 points 20 hours ago (10 children)

Good. I'll never forgive that simpering, cowardly, weak, spineless bitch for stabbing Al Franken in the back. He should quit while has a chance to do it without looking too bad, but if he won't, she should run him out in embarrassing and humiliating fashion.

AOC got into Congress by beating the #4 Democratic Congressional leader in the primary, now she's poised to beat the top Senate Democrat in the primary. She's an actual giant killer. All other Democrats should take note - it's not her politics that people are responding to, it's her strength. We need people who aren't afraid to stand up to the Nazis, and she is fearless.

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 18 hours ago

It is her politics and her strength, and Also her transparency and her target demographic. She represents the people - not the big corporations, even the corporations that favor Democrats. She's here for the 99%, and to help her people, she is willing to take from the top 1% that never should have the money they possess.

[–] letzlo@feddit.nl 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Also her politics though. They’re pretty good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 16 points 18 hours ago

I was thinking more like President but you do you.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uh oh establishment dems... that's a huge margin.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better pull strings to shoehorn the controlled opposition back in!

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Quick! Gather the superdelegates! 🥴🦸‍♂️

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 103 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The ONLY thing I'm learning from these Polls is that we need to go FURTHER RIGHT and Bring Back HARRIS!

-The DNC!

[–] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 35 points 23 hours ago

Biden is already offering to come out of retirement to help!

Fuck off you old POS. I’m so ready for someone like AOC to be the front runner. This country needs it whether the majority of people realize it or not.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 126 points 1 day ago (8 children)

What a dream come true it would be to have AOC primary him.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Try lowering your glasses even further Chuck!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's amazing to me that she's still only a congresswoman. I can't think of anybody who has been in the national spotlight for that long without moving up to at least senator, if not a cabinet position.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Senators are congresswomen, no?

[–] Urfgurgle@reddthat.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Technically yes, but we commonly refer to members of the House as congressmen/women and members of the Senate as senators. Being a senator gives you more power because there are only 100 of them compared to 435 House members, so it is a meaningful distinction to make.

[–] imnotafish@midwest.social 58 points 1 day ago

She speaks reality. People in control deal with very controlled messaging. They don’t like people they can’t control.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›