this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
342 points (98.3% liked)

politics

23037 readers
3350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Trump’s approval has taken a substantial swing of 9.6 points, from a net positive of 6.2 points in late January to a net negative of 3.4 points in mid-April.
  • Trump’s loss in support among Hispanic and young adults has been especially steep.
  • The president has not persuaded Americans that foreign countries and producers will bear the burden of higher tariffs, or that the gain will be worth the pain.
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 27 minutes ago

The only poll I'm interested is the one that puts him in a short-drop noose.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It still blows my mind that he ever had any to start with.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

Technically he didn't. He's in office because there is no support for the opposition. It's the same shit Putin used to do to stay in power: make his opponents seem as unlikable as possible.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Unless we get a bunch of support for the opposition this means fuck all.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Like if they choose MTG next, we're so extremely screwed.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Trump doesn't care about the public. Trump only cares about himself.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 14 points 12 hours ago

A simple executive order will fix that

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

huh. can't imagine why.

[–] VasovagalSyncope@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He still has 40% support, so he's still incredibly popular.

We all know what it actually takes to stop Fascists.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

This guy had an idea once.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

40% of people that would respond to a stupid fucking survey on popularity.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

It's closer to what Obama was at mid career. If you want bad you gotta hit W numbers, he was at a low of 19% approval in 2008.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

He won the popular vote. Step foot outside an urban area and you'll see that his popular support isn't just an illusion.

There's a floor of around 38% of Americans who are going to hold that line to the death. They've lost friends, family, and businesses over their stance already and haven't budged. This has been going on for ten years now. They're in it til the end.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lucky for him he doesn’t need public support. Or care.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Bullshit. Every leader, even a dictator, needs public support.

The deeper they get their claws in, the less support they need. But Trump doesn’t have them in that deep yet.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah, if the president hits Bush numbers like 19% in 2008 or lower then you get a much higher chance of being ousted. If you lose enough popularity within the Republican party then the Senate can impeach him and remove him from office.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every leader, even a dictator, needs public support.

They get it, implicitly, from the mass of people who continue about their business uninterrupted.

What protest seeks to do is to kick off a popularly supported disruption in a dictator's supply chain. But what they risk is taking the blame for the crisis, as a result.

The deeper they get their claws in, the less support they need. But Trump doesn’t have them in that deep yet.

He's got all the cabinet level offices and is purging the departments of opponents. There is nothing currently in his way

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is exactly what I’m referring to, yes. If people withdraw their support, the regime always collapses. However, things usually have to get bad for people to feel motivated enough to do this.

He has near full control of the executive branch, which is perhaps the most powerful force in our society. But it is not the only force. We have seen resistance from the judiciary, from universities, from law firms, from businesses, from unions, and of course from ordinary people. Right now most of this resistance has been fairly weak and disorganized. But I expect it to grow in strength as the ineffectiveness of his governance becomes more apparent and his popularity drops.

That’s not to say we should be complacent. Most people here are relatively educated and radicalized to see where things could be headed if Trump is not stopped. Everyone reading this should be thinking about how they can safely resist and especially who they can connect to and cooperate with to make this resistance stronger and more effective.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think he intends to win any more elections.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

I didn’t say anything about elections.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Might as well just poll the DHS at this point

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Polls don't mean shit. You're gonna need to drag him out of the oval office by his ankles if you want him to leave.

[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Polls do matter, because it won't go over well to "Mousolini" him if he still has a strong base. But clearly he and Bukele are wary of the growing unrest, or else they would not have separated Garcia from the CECOT gen pop or allowed a photo op.

We are only 3 months in and he has flinched a few times. There is serious hope that his reign will be much shorter than Erdogan's, for example, regardless of his personal health.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Important to remember trump is a symptom. It's his cult of supporters that stand behind and support no matter what he does.

This is 10s of millions of people. They are police, lawyers, judges, doctors, teachers, neighbors, etc.

Getting rid of trump is important, but the point is we have much bigger foundational problems to fix. Conservative elite billionaire oligarchy class owning our media, political system, education, propaganda, etc. They are the ones who helped cause all this.

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 4 points 1 day ago

Russian election interference?

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

what were the 18-24 year olds thinking when they voted Trump?

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 16 hours ago

Same crap I thought in 2016 probably (thanks reddit). F the dems and burn the place to ground. I f%#!ing hope they grow up. Cause that was a terrible choice. I still say f the dems but you need to prioritize targets from most evil first then work your way down.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

They didn't. They didn't vote for the alternative because of one issue. That's the problem.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The party would rather have trump than abandon their only issue.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 0 points 21 minutes ago

People can't control the party, but they could impact the outcome and choose not to.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I hope they're happy. That is all.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I'm sure they are. They got their second choice (well, third, but netanyahu can't run in the US), they're getting the policy they wanted, and they get to blame the left for all of it.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Have you been on YouTube lately? (Or any algorithmic social media in general, like Facebook?) Pro-MAGA content gets promoted while anything against is buried. Anti-Trump comments are hidden and you get a "some content might not be visible yet" message in your comment history.

Gen Z was raised by algorithms, so is it really a big surprise that they lean MAGA?

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only he had told us what he was going to do

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

If only the people actually understood what it would mean and what the costs would be