None of these detectors can work. It's just snake oil for technophobes.
Understand what "positive predictive value" means to see that. Though, in this case, I doubt that even the true rates can be known or that they remain constant over time.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
None of these detectors can work. It's just snake oil for technophobes.
Understand what "positive predictive value" means to see that. Though, in this case, I doubt that even the true rates can be known or that they remain constant over time.
Even if they did, they would jsut be used to train a new generation of AI that could defeat the detector, and we'd be back round to square 1.
It was used in schools...
Congratulations, you just created a generation of children who will never truly trust authority figures.
more useful than most of what's taught
On social media the standard is to call everything AI by default. It's nearly impossible to prove otherwise before people lose interest in the thread, so you can feel right every time. Nothing but win!
I have a competing technology that is nearly as accurate. For only $50 I'll send you this device that you will have unlimited license usage rights to. While not 53% accurate like my competitor, its proven by scientific studies to be 50% accurate. I also offer volume discounts if you buy 10 the price drops to only $45 per device. Sign up now!
That is supposed to be reliable? It doesn't even have a subscription service.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-penny-treasury-mint-192e3b9ad9891d50e7014997653051ba
Trump says he has directed US Treasury to stop minting new pennies, citing rising cost
Trump on a streak of rare Ws. No more pennies and kicking Poilievre out of the Canadian Parliament.
Wait, he actually did something good?
Actually is 51% favouring the side facing up when flipped
That's easy to fix. Just randomize it. Flip a coin to see which side faces up.
Shhh! We're releasing that accuracy update in the next version of the product. We need to sell through our existing inventory of the less accurate ones.
Oh god. And this was mostly used against kids.
53% is abysmal, it might as well be a coin flip. FYI this article is about a random one called BrandWell, popular AI detectors like GPTZero are much more accurate.
All of it is snake oil, it's fundamentally not possible to detect ai generated text without watermarking it first.
Much more accurate than guessing is not a strong endorsement.
54% of the time it's right 98% of the time
The worst part is they may weasel out of it. If the claim was "it detects 98% of AI generated samples" it could do that while having a high false positive rate. I hate this timelime.
"They've done studies you know. 53% of the time, it works 98% of the time."