this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
373 points (95.4% liked)

News

22890 readers
3894 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sophee Langerman was on her way to a bicycle safety rally in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood in June when a car turning right rolled through a red light and slammed into her bike, which she was walking off the curb and into the crosswalk.

The car was moving slowly enough that Langerman escaped serious injury, but the bicycle required extensive repairs. To Langerman, it's another argument for ending a practice that almost all U.S. cities have embraced for decades: the legal prerogative for a driver to turn right after stopping at a red light.

A dramatic rise in accidents killing or injuring pedestrians and bicyclists has led to a myriad of policy and infrastructure changes, but moves to ban right on red have drawn some of the most intense sentiments on both sides.

Washington, D.C.'s City Council last year approved a right-on-red ban that takes effect in 2025. New Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's transition plan called for "restricting right turns on red," but his administration hasn't provided specifics. The college town of Ann Arbor, Michigan, now prohibits right turns at red lights in the downtown area.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NBJack@reddthat.com 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, and it has nothing to do with the big ass vehicles being churned out due to loopholes in US law.

https://www.distilled.earth/p/the-loophole-that-made-cars-in-america

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Just freaken yesterday I was walking with my kids and there was a sports utility bullshit parked ready to come out of the garage and as we passed I noted that not one of my kids is tall enough to be seen by the driver if they decide to move forward.

A sports utility truck is a truck not a car. Require a CDL to operate or better yet just buy a regular car.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

"What's really behind this movement is part of the agenda to make driving as miserable and as difficult as possible so people don't drive so much," Beeber said.

This is an unbelievably idiotic statement, as if cars haven't been, and don't continue to be nearly the sole consideration for transportation in almost all American cities.

[–] suprchrgd@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm totally down for this. Right turn on red is optional, but people behind me seem to think it's required and lay on their horns if I stop for more than a second. Like come on, I need a moment to make sure someone isn't trying to cross!

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't agree with this. It has nothing to do with red lights. Drivers will cut out straight in front of me with green lights as well. The problem is proper infrastructure. Make a city where there are so many cyclists that cars can't miss them. This is why places like NYC have such low incidents at crosswalks.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Or better yet, give cyclists sperated spaces from cars and trucks to ride. Even if it's just letting them ride on sidewalks. (Although not applicable in this case)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 10 months ago

That, and also because NYC has already banned right on red.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 10 months ago

"What's really behind this movement is part of the agenda to make driving as miserable and as difficult as possible so people don't drive so much," Beeber said.

Shit. He figured my plan out.

But seriously people driving less would be a win. Cars are awful.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who went to the US recently and nearly got taken out by a driver rolling right through the crosswalk only looking to her left, get rid of right turn on red. We survive just fine without it (well, it would technically be a left turn here) in Japan.

[–] omgarm@feddit.nl 10 points 10 months ago

In the Netherlands it wouldn't even work as yhere are usually cycle paths or pedestrian crossings that have a green light. Right turns have their own light whenever possible to make sure they are on their own cycle.

[–] arquebus_x@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's the size of the cars that's causing the increase.

[–] Centillionaire@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow, you are totally right.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

SUVs and pickup trucks do not have to follow the safety regulations of passenger cars.

Passenger cars have rounded pedestrian safe bumpers that are designed to scoop under a pedestrian in a collision, resulting in injuries that are likely to be survivable.

Modern pickup trucks have massive flat grills directly at chest height, which act as a battering ram, and will roll over a pedestrian in a collision, resulting in injuries that are unlikely to be survivable. Pickup trucks and SUVs have large front blind spots that make them more likely to cause collisions than normal cars.

The increasing numbers of pedestrian fatalities is caused by the increasing number and size of pickup trucks and SUVs. This will only change if the feds close the loopholes that allow SUVs to not follow the same regulations as cars.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

I think it's a visibility thing too. Also many distracted drivers.

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it's pretty easy to not hit someone while turning right on red if you look where you're going...

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In a lot of cities, it's extremely difficult to see past the corner because of parked cars. We could cut down on street parking, but people scream if you even consider restricting their parking options.

[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Especially when those parked vehicles are trucks or SUVs or some other unsafe large vehicle.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I mean I have a hate boner for giant cars as much the average person, but even a reasonably-sized, economy sedan can block my view of the sidewalk/any cars that might be coming around the corner. I would say it's a 50% chance in my city that, in order to safely turn right on red, I'd need to inch about halfway into the lane I'm turning into, which already has the potential of causing an accident.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

When I visited the US I was shocked that’s actually allowed. Seemed like a very easy way to kill someone

[–] ours@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

It's the "cars above all" mentality.

That said my city is doing this for bicycles which is way more reasonable.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I couldn't work out how you were supposed to negotiate it as a pedestrian, and assumed there must be some knack that locals learn. Guess the knack is just, don't be a pedestrian lol.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The spike, which included all accidents — not just those involving right turns on red, was attributed in part to an increase in larger vehicles such as SUVs and pickup trucks on the road ... due to larger blind spots and the deadlier force associated with heavier models.

There it is, this is just one reason why 'no right turns' will be a useless half measure, politicians trying to make it look like they're doing something about the problem because the real solution would be too politically risky.

[–] molotov@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My own anecdotal evidence, walking several blocks and crossing a busy intersection everyday.

I take attempts to not get hit by looking at the driver and checking to see if they are paying attention. Often a driver will inch forward until they can time turning between cars coming from the opposite side of the intersection or will turn immediately when the light changes. I often have people who wait, but mostly people will just drive past me while I stand waiting to cross.

Car size doesn't seem to make any difference in how aware the driver is or if they are following driver safety, at least when I'm attempting to keep myself from being hit.

[–] Enoblk@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It less serious than this but on my drive home there is this spot with 4 car lengths between stop lights and people with trailers keep taking it as free right to get into the middle of 3 northbound lanes blocking off the far right lane for turning right at the next light

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

If there isn't other cross traffic, I'm going no matter what. In MA, we can even take a left on red onto a one way.

Huge majority of lighted intesections could be replaced with roundabouts/rotaries/traffic circles. Cars should not have to sit at idle if nothing is in the way.