this post was submitted on 26 May 2025

19 points (64.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

42207 readers

696 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

All posts must be showerthoughts
The entire showerthought must be in the title
No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
Posts must be original/unique
Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

vatlark@lemmy.world

forkball@lemmy.world

SuperEars@lemmy.world

Funny how we see the world in landscape, but live it mostly in portrait. (feddit.org)

submitted 1 year ago by _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not really a shower thought, I came to this perspective in my dreams. And yes, that night's sleep absolutely slapped.

top 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

Strong Jayden Smith vibes here

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, we see the world in

correct diagram of human visual field

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

[–] remon@ani.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean with "live mostly in portrait". Can you give an example?

[+] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Poah, ok let's do this:

reading a book
interacting with your smartphone
using the fridge
standing in an elevator
street signs
restaurant menus
tapping someone on the shoulder (vertical not horizontal interaction)
looking at paintings
standing in line
observing a statue
interacting with your closet
looking someone up and down
etc, etc, etc

Just some I could come up with on the fly

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

a spectacularly healthy dose of cherry-picking with this one.

what about watching movies at the cinema? playing video games on the tv? train carriages? the back seat of a car? double beds? panoramas? the horizon? a computer's qwerty keyboard? side-by-side boobs? side-by-side arms? the ending shootout of the good, the bad, the ugly? thw viewscreen of the starship enterprise? car windscreens? baby got back? landscape paintings?

[–] remon@ani.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most of those are quite specific actions and they don't really add up to "most of our lives".

For example I spend at least 8hours watching on landscape-screen at work (and a couple more observing at home). Reading books, menues, using the fridge, riding elevators or observing statues doesn't really add up to anything close to that.

Also some examples are a big confusing. Street signs are usually round, square or ... landscape. Generally when in traffic you'll be observing everything in landscape. Or how is standing in-line a portait action?

I think most people (at least me) are mostly living in landscape.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Really, this argument you're both having ignores the greater mystery.

What the fuck is humans obsession with right angles?

They don't represent our actual visual field
They aren't space efficient.
They aren't strong.

Yet we have infused them everything.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Simplicity, is the short answer. Euclidean shapes are easy to conceptualize and reproduce, and rectangles are among the simplest of them

[–] Michal@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Text in a book is horizontal, also an opened book is most often wider than tall - so it's in landscape too. It's only in portrait when it's closed so it'll take up less space on the shelf - which is also horizontal.

You can use smartphone in landscape too, but it's not as convenient to hold, and read text. But for watching video, you bet I'll rotate it to landscape.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Text in a book is horizontal

on your phone too, but it is still in a vertical rectangle of view

also an opened book is most often wider than tall

but most often you are only observing a single page, don't you?

I think OP's point is not about the shape or layout of things, but the "rectangle of view" or "bounding box" or whatever.

[–] epicsninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You're only observing a single page, which is taller than wide, but you're also only observing a single word, which is generally wider than tall.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Open a picture on your cell phone. Any portrait picture. Now look at it. Do your eyes focus on the whole picture? No, you focus on a portion of it at a time. It doesn't matter that the orientation is vertical, the frame of your focus is the same no matter what you look at.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's an interesting observation. We observe the world in landscape because our eyes are positioned to give us a goid balance between binocular vision and seeing predators in our peripheral vision, but most of our interactions are portrait, I suspect due to our upright posture. Most of the instances you mentioned are with things that either are, or are evolutiobs if things that were, designed around the fact we are talker than we are wide.

It would be interesting to observe whether animals with a different posture interact differently.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alright, I go to work, my house and playing football.

All these things are in landscape. I know my shower is in portrait, which makes this post oddly good in this sub, but the rest of my rooms are also wider than tall.

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org -3 points 1 year ago

Yes - but have you been on your smartphone lately? Have you read a book? Looked in the mirror? Interacted with your vertical (hopefully not too horizontal) girlfriend / boyfriend? Sometimes I feel like the human eye is too limited upwards / downwards.

[–] remon@ani.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean with "live mostly in portrait". Can you give an example?

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Certainly.
I've hidden lots of cameras around your house and the screens that I use to watch you are in portrait configuration.
Hope that helps. Also, you're running low on shampoo.