this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
26 points (96.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32263 readers
1943 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just started using paywall bypass plugin - BPC. Honestly, love it so far. I found that both their github and gitlab are blocked. I found that tool at gitflic.ru

Never, used this repository or the extension before. Curious, if people from the community use it and how secure they would consider this?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I am using it. I found it very suspicious it is hosted on a Russian website at first. However because of copyright violations the author couldn't leave the extension on a server the US/EU can access.
The extension clearly states which websites it is accessing and you can look through the whole list. I did that a while ago and found nothing suspicious. I trust the author, but you can never know for sure.

[–] salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Ah great, thanks!

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Copyright violations for a browser extension that simply bypasses paywalls? Sound fishy as tools like Ublock Origin can do the same and have been well known for years and faced no takedown requests.

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Bypass Paywall Clean was the defacto standard for bypassing paywall until it got taken down. It can reliably bypass the paywalls of hundreds of different international news agencies. If you can achieve that with a UBlock script I will be very happy if you could share it.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It is a browser extension that enables you to bypass paywalls on websites.

[–] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Illegal = you can go to jail. You're not gonna go to jail just for using a browser add-on.

Against policy = sure. That doesn't stop me from using NewPipe, FreeTube, AdNauseam, NoScript, etc. either, though, nor should it you.

[–] salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ahaha, couldn't articulate better myself!

[–] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hmmm...

Why not the removepaywalls.com extension?

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. Well, I simply literally didn't know about this one.
  2. Bypass Paywalls Clean is (or was; not sure now) open-source while this doesn't appear to be.
[–] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Ok then, i'm convinced

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I use it as an imported list, and as others mentioned, it was repeatedly subject to legal action and takedowns so the creator had to flee the mainstream. Wasn’t a fan of the new site either, but it’s the best we’ve got.

[–] salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Yup indeed, and understably why it is hosted where it is.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The plugin does, unless things have changed since it left GitHub, request permission on a by-website basis in Firefox. I kind of doubt that most people are reviewing that (large) list, but that's probably about as restrictive as one could reasonably do something like this.

The TLD of the source domain is probably more-or-less irrelevant as security. If someone were trying to set up malware, if they were willing to go through even the barest of efforts, they'd be more likely to do it through a VPN on a "legitimate-looking" domain; that's one of the lowest-effort ways to increase the credibility of malware. As I recall, Jia Tan did that on GitHub.

EDIT: Hmm. That does kind of suggest that Firefox might benefit from a plugin model where plugins could only have permission to process the "current page" when a button is clicked, which I'd guess would likely work for Bypass Paywalls Clean, even if it's not how it works today. Some plugins, like Behind The Overlay, could reasonably function in such a manner.