this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
377 points (98.0% liked)

politics

23842 readers
2841 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 114 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why on earth should Zelensky do that? He knows about how important secrecy and security is. Telling Trump about this would be akin to advertize it on billboards in Moscow.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Why on earth should Zelensky do that?

he should not and without reading the article i am pretty sure that is not what it suggests. it illustrates how untrustworthy the former ally (the word leader was used in the past) of the free world is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 99 points 3 days ago

That's why it was successful

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 109 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Good thing too. The felon would have called his Russian masters and warned them.

[–] krebssteven@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I wonder tho, did no cia boots on the ground get a whiff of such an operation apparently prepared for around 18months?

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe they kept it to themselves because they know exactly who Trump works for.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Even if Trump wasn't a walking liability, why tell any more people than necessary? Everyone that knows is a potential leak no matter who they are

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And the felon is a definite leak.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rule 101, a secret shared is not a secret.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Indeed.

“Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.” - Benjamin Franklin.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

And Russian asset Tulsi Gabbard.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

did no cia boots on the ground get a whiff

You're referring to the current CIA...??

😂 🤣

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're too busy spying on Americans to waste resources in Europe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago

Not after TACO Orange Chicken leaked all those CIA operatives locations to putin, after which they died in the field.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 58 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why would Trump need to be informed about it?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If they're going to inform him, they might as well just tell Putin too.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So he can tip off his suck off buddy

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago

Just tell Pete Hegseth's wife and the Russian hackers can read about it in The Atlantic.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

He's trying to fix the peace talks all on his own while undermining the EU.

Him not getting informed while EU members do would make him very upset.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

He's busy. Wake him up when he has to approve the next bribe.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 71 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Good. Don't tell us shit. It makes the news that much more glorious knowing the Ukrainians are a group of bad mother(shut yo mouth) who can pull off Andor type shit.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 33 points 3 days ago

"Trump is uninformed" doesn't seem a very newsworthy tittle really

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

How tf would he know it he had been informed or not?

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Forget to read the brief, Donnie?

Probably too busy shitting in his.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 3 days ago

If he could read, he'd be so angry at you.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 days ago

It was the breakfast from Taco Bell. Never goes down well.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't see why the US should be informed?

There shouldn't be any US equipment in the area, why bother including anyone who doesn't need to know?

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Exactly. The US isn't engaged in war with anyone as far as I know (currently). They might provide some material support to a trusted ally but they are not at war with Russia.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s weird. Wonder if it’s related to the Russian/Ukrainian peace negotiation that Ukraine wasn’t invited to.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's probably related to our complete inability to keep secrets secret right now

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hard to keep secrets when the President is openly selling them to anyone who is buying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Good. Single him out as the one not being informed.

Yes, others were kept in the dark too. But focus on the little rape pig being kept in the dark. Make TACO seethe until that crusty heart gives out.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago

Keep up the good work Ukraine.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

He never goes to any of his briefings anyway.

[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 21 points 3 days ago

Yes very good idea Ukraine. Wish we had a leader like that.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

I feel like this is good news for Ukraine.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

The title stating the obvious concerning the felon not being informed is weird, but the article is a worthwhile read:

Some of the trucks were parked in Siberia, thousands of miles away from Ukraine, according to the report.

About 40 Russian military planes, including strategic bombers, were reportedly struck in the attack.

I cannot begin to imagine what a blow this is to Russia's crumbling air force. And the ingenuity of the attack (some of whose details are omitted in this article - though you may have read more about it in others) is phenomenal.

And don't forget this little tidbit - also a developing story:

Ukraine’s unprecedented drone attack on Russia comes as seven people were killed and 69 more injured after bridges collapsed in separate incidents across Russia.

I imagine the pending defenestrations of some Russian officials might be kept secret.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Smartest possible move on their part. Trump is dangerous and can’t be trusted not to tell Putin.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 days ago

Another headline said the opposite. But I find this more likely.

Trump: Excuse me, Vlad. I just learned about something you'll want to know about.

[–] redditigon@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Tell him they found their cards!

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Is Ukraine supposed to inform the US of these things? That seems...like not a great idea.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago

Demented grandpa is just pissed because he has no friends. Slava Ukraine!

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that seems wise.

load more comments
view more: next ›