this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
296 points (95.7% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

12250 readers
473 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 59 minutes ago

if only deezer didn't have data breaches

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

I just use OuterTune for YT Music. It works and it is less sus than ReVanced YT Music

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 4 points 12 hours ago

Can't ungoogle myself this time. YT music has probably the best catalog of all and it's easily moddable

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 2 points 11 hours ago

Some of these services don't offer themselves in turkey (tidal)

[–] SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a way to get a list of all the songs I like on spotify for archival purposes? Not the file, just a list. Like a shopping list.

[–] FallenWalnut@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

You can check out Soundiiz

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If you are moving to deezer they will take over all your playlists. They have a third party service on teir website that does it. It moved thousands for me with minimal issues. A couple live tracks and very niche local sonfs missing. I would say easily 99.9% transfer accuracy and it listed the outliers.

The service works regardless of who you move to or from.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I tend to wear a special hat that allows me to consume music in any format or device I like.

and then go donate to, or purchase music directly from the artists that I like.

[–] pirat@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

yar har har.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Which one has the biggest selection and highest quality audio, ad-free for $0/mo?

I use YouTube Music ReVanced, and while the audio quality isn't the highest (because it's YouTube), you can't beat the song selection. Especially when it's free and ad-free.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You're likely violating the YouTube terms of service and can be banned at any moment. Also you're stealing from musicians. Lemmy has multiple piracy communities that can probably give you more options

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I use Anghami myself

[–] TuxEnthusiast@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This graphic seems to put Spotify in a "less shit" category than the other big players based on national origin or something.

From a quality and fairness perspective Spotify is just as bad. A large list of credible musicians and content creators have detailed the poor compensation, shift towards fake artists and AI filler tracks, and other moves Spotify has made that harm the artists and provide a worse listener experience.

If you want to fairly compensate artists, you'd be better off pirating 100% of your streams using alternate frontends for YT music, then making a list of your top 10-20 artists and buying an album or T-shirt from each of their official websites. They will make a lot better margin on that and its better for their career than any amount of streams you can give as one individual. (Also go to shows when available locally)

[–] gila@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

Some of the categories for this infographic are arbitrary within the context of the music streaming market. Spotify is literally a more "incumbent" "monopoly" than the "big tech incumbents" if you only consider the segment of those companies' operations related to music streaming. Spotify is probably the worst choice of all, both using the ethos provided by the infographic and by other metrics too. Tech companies with 150B capitalisation are big tech regardless of how much bigger others are.

[–] rainha_da_sucata@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

I've been considering this and although I'm not one to pirate anything (my skills for this stayed in 1999) I've been buying CDs out of thrift stores and ripping them :)

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A glance at this makes me happy to just keep playing my mp3s.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago

I'm trying to get most of what I like on CD and then host a jellyfin server

[–] Hadowenkiroast@piefed.social 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

i decided to self host my library in as high of a res I could using Navidrome/subsonic.

I had a FiiO X3 anyway so i already had a FLAC capable player.

in the end, even if i know it's not for everyone. selfhosting is the only way to never lose what u love. so many of my lesser known tracks are just gone on spotify.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never lose as long as you have a good backup strategy.

[–] Hadowenkiroast@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Very True, that is one of the few things people don't realize enough when starting selfhosting. Backups and documenting what you did.

I have a raid NAS keeping my data in-house which has an encrypted backup in the cloud (Infomaniak kdrive) and my FiiO X3 SD card which is an additional portable backup. So on that front, I don't worry too much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

If you're paying for music, stay away from any music publisher that doesn't give you the option of keeping a DRM-free copy for yourself that can be played back in perpetuity, unconditionally.

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tidal is owned by Block, the owners of Square, which is the biggest POS vendor in the US. If that’s not big tech I don’t know what is.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Part of the reason I just shifted to a fully self-hosted setup.

Left Spotify because of all the bullshit they pull, tried out Tidal because of the higher quality and higher artist pay, but even if it is a substantially better platform, its ownership is questionable to say the least.

I dusted off bandcamp and learned to use slskd to build a full local high quality library powered by a Navidrome instance.

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RustedSnail@europe.pub 4 points 22 hours ago

I tried them for a bit and really wanted to like them but their "modern" metal catalog, playlists, and discover-ability was so bad I had to begrudgingly go back to tidal.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Naspers is a South African multinational internet, technology and multimedia holding company headquartered in Cape Town... did you mean Napster...? Did you generate this with AI or something?

Why would the largest music streaming service in the world be in the "other" category and not the "Big Tech Incumbents".

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeh and the blurb for splotifry reads like an ad, with not a negative word to say about this exploitative monster.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, the "To Note" section includes information about their worse practices. The whole infographic is such a nonsense mishmash.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been happy with Bandcamp. They got sold recently so their future is uncertain, but I downloaded all the music I bought.

They don't really have an algorithm, but you can see who else purchased something, and they do blog posts about like "what's new in [genre]" that's worth reading. So far as I can tell it's written by real people.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They also have regular "Bandcamp Fridays", where they forego their 25% and give musicians 100% of proceeds for the day. It's a good chance to directly support small artists.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, from the conversations I've had, they're kind of the best of a bad bunch, all things considered.

[–] GargleBlaster@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I switched from Spotify to tidal then deezer and finally landed on qobuz. While the app still has some problems and the music selection is not as massive as on Spotify (but mainly in super niche content), the higher artist pay and amazing soundquality are definitely worth it

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Spotify to tidal then deezer and finally landed on qobuz

Steps out of Time Machine from 15 years ago

WTF

[–] psychadlligoat@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Deezer is from 2007, someone from 15 years ago could easily have heard of it

tidal is from 2014, so not quite

Qobuz is actually new, 2023

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] psychadlligoat@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

More of a fun fact, I didn't think Deezer or Tidal were THAT old

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Poob has it for you.

[–] Bubs@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Wipur is the next big deal, but Boodle is likely to replace it. Slove is already dying, but iMPUR and Doofz look promising as replacements.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Qobuz also does purchaseable music, not just streaming.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] mortalglowworm@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

There are also Faircamp and Mirlo, if you are looking for even fairer and progressive alternatives.

load more comments
view more: next ›