this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
133 points (95.2% liked)

News

37617 readers
1842 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oregon’s first-in-the-nation law that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of heroin, cocaine and other illicit drugs in favor of an emphasis on addiction treatment is facing strong headwinds in the progressive state after an explosion of public drug use fueled by the proliferation of fentanyl and a surge in deaths from opioids, including those of children.

“The inability for people to live their day-to-day life without encountering open-air drug use is so pressing on urban folks’ minds,” said John Horvick, vice president of polling firm DHM Research. “That has very much changed people’s perspective about what they think Measure 110 is.”

When the law was approved by 58% of Oregon voters three years ago, supporters championed Measure 110 as a revolutionary approach that would transform addiction by minimizing penalties for drug use and investing instead in recovery.

But even top Democratic lawmakers who backed the law, which will likely dominate the upcoming legislative session, say they’re now open to revisiting it after the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states that have reported their numbers.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 99 points 2 years ago (3 children)

And of course nobody even contemplating the idea that they underfunded the resources invested in recovery and that's the change they need to make.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oregonian here. And... Yep. That's it exactly.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Second Oregonian here, and also yup. We decriminalized but then decided not to require treatment (Portugal method), and then didn't fund treatment anyway.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Portugal doesn't require treatment. I don't know where this idea came from, but this isn't the first time I've seen this misinformation.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one seems to wonder where all our income tax is going. Hmmmmmm

[–] buffaloboobs@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

so, Oregon had "the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states" 😱

"...that have reported their numbers."

I feel like that last phrase is doing a lot of work. I'm not going to put in the work to figure out the numbers, but it's a weird place to end the article.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

Same with homeless and gun activity. Some states, exclusively red states, don't share their statistics or just don't want to pay to track them.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's almost as if the half-assed decriminalization effort was not done in earnest because opponents want to see it fail. We have cops not doing their jobs, government officials not emulating existing models (like Portugal), and recovery clinics that will turn you away if you haven't been doing the "right" opiates.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seriously. We have models that are proven to work. Just fucking emulate them.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, if the people are willing to risk their lives with an overdose, I don't think a criminal penalty is going to scare them very much. So, yeah, more resources for treatment are probably necessary.

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the same dumb approach as it is with the "housing first" model. Yes this models work and they work great!

But you actually have to read more than just the headline of the paper. The decriminalisation of drugs in Portugal for example came with a whole bunch of other new regulations and programs. It wasn't "just" decriminalise drugs and be done with it.

We are approaching Idiocracy status fast...

[–] Harpsist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think we're nose deep in idiocrazy.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's almost as if legalizing the sale of drugs would give a safe place to get drugs that aren't laced with fentanyl.

This helps those with addiction from getting caught up in the prison system, but nothing to make them safer when taking drugs.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Or in some cases you could get Fentanyl but have it correctly labeled, dosed, and administered.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We didn't legalize them, just decriminalized them. Problem is, we didn't follow the Portugal method and require them to get treatment… just not caught up in the system. So of course this was going to happen.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

In the first year after the law took effect in February 2021, only 1% of people who received citations for possession sought help via the hotline

This tells me the voluntary approach does not work. I'm going to guess those citations do not get paid either.