this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
673 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25093 readers
2401 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 168 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Saw this coming when he decided to eliminate bad weather by not reporting it.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 99 points 4 days ago

And eliminate COVID-19 by not reporting it.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 85 points 4 days ago

And when he tried to eliminate the Epstein story by having him killed

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

You hear about him getting rid of the NTSB because it made his military and FAA look bad.

I might be a traveler from thr future, only time will tell.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 139 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's crazy how close to full on authoritarianism the US has become in only 7 months.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

It’s not all that crazy since they had a carefully designed scheme all planned out in Project 2025. People acted like that was some kind of conspiracy theory, but they literally printed it up. 🤬

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 69 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Stay tuned. It's going to get much worse before the American people actually do something about it.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 days ago

Trumps approval rating is in the low 40s. Almost half this country are cheering it on.

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even then I doubt Americans will do much. We’re not a smart bunch.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You say that as if even if they were, they could do anything about it.

There were a ton of smart citizens in Germany in the 1930s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 49 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Americans were like that during the Bush years. Illegal wars, torture, inept cronyism.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (10 children)

I kind of excused some of that due to societal PTSD from 9/11 but in retrospect around half of Americans just fucking suck.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One could see how bloodthirsty they were as soon as they saw the opportunity to have extrajudicial punishment and the opportunity to kill a lot of brown people.

i was in college in utah. people at there were openly talking in the lunchroom about how excited they were to kill muslims. every time i'd challenge that narrative dozens of people would shout it down. it was disgusting.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

societal PTSD from 9/11

I feel 9/11 was less of a "we were struck by the ravages of war" and more of a "how dare they shoot back" event. If it was like the bombing of London by the Nazis, that makes most people reluctant to go to war instead of making war popular.

I mean, who looks at 9/11 and says "we want more of this"? Apparently most Americans?

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 9 points 4 days ago

It was revenge for making Americans feel vulnerable. Two oceans and the world's strongest military made Americans feel safe from the world (and the effects of U.S. policies toward it). Even national humiliations like losing the Vietnam War were things that happened "out there." Domestic resistance to the invasion of Iraq often took the form of "Why Iraq when we should be going after the people responsible for 9/11 instead?" Resistance to the invasion of Afghanistan was much more muted for this reason. It was only later that everyone was always against both wars.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is not even close to the same thing as the Bush years.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The veneer of respectability is gone. 250 years of slavery, 100 of segregation, COINTELPRO, overthrowing democratically elected governments across Latin America, the Red Scare, 'Regime Change', the Patriot Act etc. This has always been an authoritarian country controlled by the wealthy. Trump just stopped pretending to be anything else.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

This post deserves more attention. It's disappointing how short people's memory is and how few can see the bigger picture. It didn't start with Trump and it's not going to end with him. I like to think of this administration like a comic relief that's not very funny.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

The current regime is just the next step in authoritarian fascism from the Trump era. Democrats should have arrested and exposed all the criminals but they prefer neoliberal economics and performative actions over justice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago

The bellends own words "... replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can’t be manipulated for political purposes". There is tragedy that we need social media to call out his misleading the public.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

republicans are dumber than dogshit, I swear.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it's not dumb, it's just textbook fascism, this is straight out of Mussolini's playbook

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The voters are dumb as dirt though.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The fascist supporters aren't a monolith. Yes many are dumb, but too many are aware and actively like the evil. Some are "smart" but are low information and still vote straight R like they used to, some are deeply in the cult (and just need to be silenced as much as possible, because they're too far gone to help), some are openly fascist, etc.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Fascist States of Amerikkka

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

How long before this and similar sites for rational and civilised discours are "banned" in the US.?

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 43 points 4 days ago

Fucking pathetic... that's what those who see strength in that turd are.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 4 days ago

I think it says something interesting that the American criticism of an American dictator put in place by corporatism is talking about that time America helped one its corporations conquer South American countries.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm confused -- if he knew Trump was going to be so mad, why didn't he just release better numbers? That's how it used to work in the USSR and plenty of people were able to keep their government jobs.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 3 days ago

Because you can't just make up the numbers, everyone has to lie a little bit at every step or you get endless whistleblowers

It takes time to build that kind of administrative understanding

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

He's done it with the Epstein files...

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oddly, bananas seem to be one of the few items relatively untouched by inflation.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

And it makes sense that the US is turning into a Banana Republic itself, considering the Banana Republics were a result of American corporations and the US government using their power to undermine democracy in those countries.

From wikipedia:

A banana republic is a country with an economy of state capitalism, where the country is operated as a private commercial enterprise for the exclusive profit of the ruling class. Typically, a banana republic has a society of extremely stratified social classes, usually a large impoverished working class and a ruling class plutocracy, composed of the business, political, and military elites.The ruling class controls the primary sector of the economy by exploiting labor.

Sounds pretty familiar

How it happened in Guatemala:

During the 1950s, the United Fruit Company sought to convince the governments of U.S. presidents Harry S. Truman (1945–1953) and Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961) that the popular, elected government of President Jacobo Árbenz of Guatemala was secretly pro-Soviet for having expropriated unused "fruit company lands" to landless peasants. In the Cold War (1945–1991) context of the proactive anti-communist politics exemplified by U.S. senator Joseph McCarthy in the years 1947–1957, geo-political concerns about the security of the Western Hemisphere facilitated Eisenhower's ordering and authorising Operation Success. It was a 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état by means of which the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency deposed the democratically elected government of Árbenz and installed the pro-business government of Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas (1954–1957), which lasted for three years until his assassination by a presidential guard.[2][19]

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

secretly pro-Soviet

Ah that chronic brain worm hasn't gone away... It is super handy to have a general purpose all-evil evidence-free adversary to blame everything on.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They've gone up quite a bit in my corner of the US. They used to be 30 cents a pound and now they're 53 cents per pound for the same product at the same store in the last few months.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hm, you're right, they're 69 Canada cents/lbs and they used to be half that. I only buy two at a time so like I don't notice. They're still affordable in absolute terms, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 17 points 4 days ago

if you don't allow X.com because of content tracking that is not an article but a long list of twitter garbage blocked

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Don’t like that they’re saying you’re a bad dictator? Fire them!

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

By firing him, trump ironically directly decreased the number of employment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 12 points 4 days ago

It’s probably tied up with the Epstein files and who is in them. A diversion.

[–] zymagoras777@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Sorry to disappoint but that name is already taken. Lithuania is banana republic.

load more comments
view more: next ›