this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

77 readers

1 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@nfl.community

rglullis

NFL Power Rankings (Combined) Week 12 (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by mikebiox@alien.top to c/nfl@nfl.community

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

| | Team | SI | SN | Y! | B/R | CBS | USA | NFL | ESPN | Avg | SD | CGPR | |

| | 1 | Philadelphia (0) | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1 | | 2 | San Francisco (0) | | 2 | 2 | 3 | | 2 | | 2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 4 | | 3 | Kansas City (0) | | 3 | 3 | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 6 | | 4 | Baltimore (1) | | 4 | 4 | 4 | | 4 | | 3 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 2 | | 5 | Dallas (1) | | 7 | 7 | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 3 | | 6 | Miami (2) | | 5 | 6 | 6 | | 6 | | 6 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 7 | | 7 | Detroit (-3) | | 8 | 5 | 8 | | 7 | | 7 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 8 | | 8 | Jacksonville (1) | | 6 | 8 | 7 | | 8 | | 8 | 7.4 | 0.9 | 5 | | 9 | Buffalo (2) | | 13 | 10 | 9 | | 11 | | 10 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 13 | | 10 | Pittsburgh (4) | | 9 | 13 | 12 | | 10 | | 9 | 10.6 | 1.8 | 11 | | 11 | Houston (-1) | | 12 | 12 | 10 | | 9 | | 12 | 11.0 | 1.4 | 12 | | 12 | Denver (3) | | 10 | 9 | 11 | | 13 | | 13 | 11.2 | 1.8 | 10 | | 13 | Cleveland (-5) | | 11 | 11 | 14 | | 14 | | 11 | 12.2 | 1.6 | 9 | | 14 | Seattle (-2) | | 14 | 14 | 13 | | 17 | | 14 | 14.4 | 1.5 | 18 | | 15 | Indianapolis (3) | | 15 | 16 | 15 | | 15 | | 18 | 15.8 | 1.3 | 14 | | 16 | Minnesota (-2) | | 16 | 20 | 16 | | 18 | | 15 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 15 | | 17 | LA Rams (5) | | 18 | 21 | 19 | | 12 | | 16 | 17.2 | 3.4 | 17 | | 18 | Green Bay (6) | | 25 | 15 | 18 | | 16 | | 17 | 18.2 | 4.0 | 16 | | 19 | Atlanta (4) | | 19 | 17 | 17 | | 20 | | 20 | 18.6 | 1.5 | 22 | | 20 | Cincinnati (-4) | | 17 | 19 | 21 | | 26 | | 19 | 20.4 | 3.4 | 20 | | 21 | New Orleans (-4) | | 20 | 18 | 20 | | 24 | | 21 | 20.6 | 2.2 | 21 | | 22 | LA Chargers (-3) | | 22 | 23 | 22 | | 21 | | 24 | 22.4 | 1.1 | 19 | | 23 | Las Vegas (-3) | | 21 | 22 | 26 | | 22 | | 22 | 22.6 | 1.9 | 23 | | 24 | Tampa Bay (-3) | | 23 | 25 | 24 | | 23 | | 23 | 23.6 | 0.9 | 25 | | 25 | Tennessee (2) | | 24 | 27 | 25 | | 19 | | 26 | 24.2 | 3.1 | 24 | | 26 | NY Jets (-1) | | 26 | 24 | 23 | | 27 | | 28 | 25.6 | 2.1 | 27 | | 27 | Chicago (1) | | 27 | 26 | 29 | | 25 | | 27 | 26.8 | 1.5 | 26 | | 28 | Washington (-2) | | 29 | 28 | 27 | | 30 | | 25 | 27.8 | 1.9 | 29 | | 29 | NY Giants (1) | | 28 | 29 | 28 | | 28 | | 29 | 28.4 | 0.5 | 28 | | 30 | Arizona (-1) | | 30 | 30 | 30 | | 29 | | 30 | 29.8 | 0.4 | 31 | | 31 | New England (0) | | 31 | 31 | 31 | | 31 | | 31 | 31.0 | 0.0 | 30 | | 32 | Carolina (0) | | 32 | 32 | 32 | | 32 | | 32 | 32.0 | 0.0 | 32 |

[SN] ( https://www.sportingnews.com/ca/nfl/news/nfl-power-rankings-chiefs-cowboys-browns-broncos-packers/3eda3afe4d6307fc2adc9bbe )

[SI] ( )

[CGPR] ( https://old.reddit.com/user/velociraptorfarmer/comments/185prn9/2023_week_12_nfl_power_rankings/ )

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] U_R_A_BoldOne@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Largest standard deviation in the league, baby!

[–] Economy_Cactus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did we ever do to SN?

[–] brannock_@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're ranked #17 by SN... not sure why it's listed as 25.

[–] Economy_Cactus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did we ever do to u/mikebiox

[–] WMINWMO@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Well he is a Lions fan soooo..... 30 years of torment.

[–] LazyTitan___@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

People have no idea with the NFC wild card hunt teams

[–] Comprehensive_Main@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I fail to see why Buffalo remains that high. They are 6-6

[–] NY-NC@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I fail to see why Comprehensive_Main puts 49ers flair on his Reddit account when he’s very clearly not a 49ers fan

[–] its_JustColin@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who are you gonna put ahead of them? Lmao

[–] triplec787@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

How about the team that currently has a better record and beat them two weeks ago.

[–] Matman142@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

distant neighing sounds

[–] Jamesaaronm@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

With the loss to the bears and the lose of Kirk Cousins i think the Packers (Jordan love has been great last 2 games) should be higher on the list then the Vikings at this point.

[–] Funnypenguin97@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Goddamn lol. I know we sucked last week and I don't necessarily disagree, but man moving from 4 to 7 sucks butt

[–] TMNBortles@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Up-and-coming cat teams do not get the benefit of the doubt.

[–] unique_username-_-72@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Tbh it’s been the last two weeks. The bears just put up 12 points on the Vikings and you guys squeaked by. I still think the lions are good but you can’t ignore things like that

[–] Loorrac@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Who cares, it means nothing

[–] jexmex@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they are not lying, Lions need to clean up defense and offensive line. Goff has to get control of himself again, but to do that he needs help from the OL too.

[–] Funnypenguin97@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I mean last week was the only time I thought the Oline reallyyyyy struggled. I don't think it's much of a concern. Goff does this sometimes where he has bad games.

Problem with the last two games is that they couldn't get the momentum they wanted early. Setting up the run is hugly important and we fell away from that. I'm not terribly worried, but we can't come out flat against a pretty bad saints team

[–] ArmiinTamzarian@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This power rankings are wrong. I don't see the Broncos at 2.5 nor at 3.5 or 4.5 for that matter

[–] BendubzGaming@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No mention of Amon-RaRaRaRaRa either

[–] AutomateAway@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

we definitely need a column for the Perna rankings

[–] AdaAstra@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

We should add Perna and Grossi power ranking column.

[–] fuckdangilbert@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think the SN one is wrong. GB is 17 on the current rankings, not 25.

[–] MrIrrelevantsHypeMan@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They finally got us ranked properly

[–] Kahp_R@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The pretentiousness of some of this articles when writing about the Steelers lmao. "They are going to make the playoffs even though I feel like they shouldn't, and that pisses me off."

[–] gyman122@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbf that’s every non-Steelers NFL fan

[–] EggplantAlpinism@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Can confirm

[–] axxl75@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Tbf there are a lot of Steelers "fans" saying that too. So many people rooting against the team just because they don't want to be 1 and done in the playoffs again.

Making the playoffs this season would be a pretty good accomplishment IMO regardless of how far they got.

[–] UglyDuckAI@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where is the pretentiousness?

[–] Kahp_R@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yahoo: "At least the Steelers finally outgained an opponent. This team is probably going to the playoffs, though it still doesn't look like a playoff-level team."

[–] GimbleJ@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Bengals still being at 20th is way too high. Most likely will not win another game this year. Terrible defense, no run game, a low-tier backup QB and a coach who is utterly lost without everything being perfect. ~30th would be more accurate and I'm sure they'll be near there by the end of December.

[–] PadstheFish@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll gladly take being the worst 8-3 team in the league. This feels really weird lmao

[–] qp0n@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Personally im pretty angry about being ranked the worst 10-1 team.

[–] byniri_returns@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I'm still bitter about last Thursday

[–] MaroonedOctopus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the start of this season we were talking about how much greater AFC teams and AFC QBs were than the NFC.

Now, the top 2 teams in the league are NFC teams. An NFC QB is the favorite to win the MVP award.

[–] axxl75@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The narrative preseason was how hard it would be to make the playoffs in the AFC because of all the good QBs. As in there were a lot of good QBs not that the AFC necessarily had the best singular QB or team.

Rodgers got hurt
Tua is playing well
Allen hasn't lived up to expectations this year
Mahomes is still Mahomes
Wilson has been much better lately
Herbert IMO is overhyped but the Chargers are perennial offseason favorites
Lamar is still good
Burrow was hurt and got hurt again
Stroud is looking good

Without really making any stretches, that's 9 QBs who were either rightfully hyped in the offseason (whether it turned out true or not) or have overperformed.

In the NFC you have

Hurts
Dak
Stafford
Maybe Goff
Cousins

[–] glago93@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You forgot Trevor Lawrence

[–] BWasTaken@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just happy to be invited to the party.

[–] modernzen@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weren't we 31st at some point? Wild.

[–] M44PolishMosin@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably after giving up 70 points

[–] justainsel@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I miss those days

[–] OnePieceAce@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Everything is going the Packers way the last few weeks including Jets/Bills picks getting better. Maybe we are God's favorite team till the NFCCG

[–] JeddHampton@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For anyone that is interested here is the results from my algorithms with explanations of what they mean below.

Rank	City	Team	PR_T	RP	RD	RTp	WAE	Bounce
1	San Francisco	49ers	2.241	13.29	15.06	39.37	2.74	-2.44
2	Baltimore	Ravens	2.191	11.62	14.45	40.72	3.46	-1.24
3	Dallas	Cowboys	1.513	11.38	11.26	18.54	1.42	-2.32
4	Kansas City	Chiefs	1.512	7.44	8.09	28.37	3.34	0.68
5	Philadelphia	Eagles	1.396	6.88	6.84	18.96	4.70	3.15
6	Jacksonville	Jaguars	1.116	5.52	5.74	15.82	3.48	2.08
7	Cleveland	Browns	0.914	4.06	7.95	8.60	2.36	0.94
8	Detroit	Lions	0.818	3.27	4.97	13.57	2.25	1.06
9	Buffalo	Bills	0.751	5.71	5.69	14.69	-0.45	-2.94
10	Miami	Dolphins	0.686	5.50	2.77	7.13	1.76	0.69
11	Los Angeles	Chargers	0.627	3.81	4.40	19.78	-1.02	-3.47
12	Minnesota	Vikings	0.446	2.15	3.29	12.34	-0.20	-1.65
13	Houston	Texans	0.319	1.62	1.71	7.22	0.40	-0.33
14	Indianapolis	Colts	0.297	-0.16	1.49	12.80	0.25	-0.50
15	Green Bay	Packers	0.236	0.82	1.77	3.74	0.55	0.15
16	Pittsburgh	Steelers	0.153	0.13	-0.68	-2.92	2.40	3.29
17	Cincinnati	Bengals	0.063	0.17	-2.54	9.50	-0.01	-0.20
18	Tampa Bay	Buccaneers	0.055	1.03	1.04	2.88	-1.06	-1.82
19	Denver	Broncos	-0.005	-2.32	-0.04	2.61	0.74	1.17
20	Los Angeles	Rams	-0.125	0.49	-0.65	-8.33	0.11	0.55
21	New Orleans	Saints	-0.456	-1.57	-1.90	-9.86	-1.48	-0.95
22	Seattle	Seahawks	-0.517	-3.30	-3.24	-12.89	0.01	1.56
23	Tennessee	Titans	-0.829	-3.92	-5.33	-15.24	-1.65	-0.09
24	Atlanta	Falcons	-0.938	-4.06	-5.61	-22.44	-1.33	0.74
25	Chicago	Bears	-0.996	-6.12	-6.32	-11.03	-2.79	-1.30
26	New York	Jets	-1.104	-5.01	-7.97	-23.49	-1.30	1.27
27	Las Vegas	Raiders	-1.188	-6.38	-7.43	-21.59	-2.24	0.11
28	Washington	Commanders	-1.662	-11.04	-12.61	-20.79	-2.55	1.07
29	Arizona	Cardinals	-1.794	-8.91	-12.07	-29.20	-4.05	-0.85
30	New England	Patriots	-1.884	-8.59	-12.80	-34.87	-3.50	0.19
31	Carolina	Panthers	-1.904	-9.95	-11.50	-29.70	-4.50	-1.32
32	New York	Giants	-1.917	-11.36	-14.32	-30.20	-2.64	1.68

PR_T is the ranking number here. It is an average of RP, RD, and RT (all using standard deviation in an attempt to give them equal weight), and then add in the WAE.

RP is a mean average of how many points the team scores against the average opponents' scores. Losing by 3 points to a team that usually wins by 10 nets 7 points to the total (before dividing by games played). Beating a team by 3 points that usually loses by 7 nets -4 to the total (before dividing by games played).

RD is very similar to RP except it is what percentage of the score was by the team. A team that beat another by 30-20 had 60% of the score. This again is compared to the opponent's opponents average. The teams score is the mean average of that.

RP favors offense a bit where RD favors defense a bit.

RT is one that I started tracking a few year ago. It is like RP and RD, but instead of using points it uses time. The winning team gains the seconds remaining in regulation after the winning score and the losing team gets that time subtracted. It is also compared against the opponent's opponents average and is presented in standard deviation from the mean form. The value here is divided by 36 to make it more like a percentage of a game as opposed to raw seconds. This has been pretty darn good as a power ranking method.

WAE is "Wins Above/Against Expectation". This uses the strength of schedule and win% to give a rough estimate on how many wins the team is above or below what an average team would have with the schedule that has been played. An average team with a .500 schedule would expect to be .500. An average team with a .600 schedule would expect to be .400. If you multiply the WAE by how many games have been played, it shows how many games the team won or lost compared to what an average team would be expected to do.

Bounce (formerly "Over") is something else that I'm monitoring. I created it last year specifically because the of the Vikings season. This column is a measurement of how teams are performing against the stats. I'm still trying to work my head around it. A zero here does not mean the team is playing exactly as the stats I made up suggest. This is not completely worked out.

Regardless, the lower the number in the Bounce column is the more a team is losing more than it probably should. The higher the number, the more the team is winning when it probably should lose. For reference, last year after week 16 (last I ran the numbers that season), the Vikings were 5.070 in this column. The next highest was the Colts at 2.399. The lowest was the 49ers at -2.887.

Below is the rated performance of each team this week using mostly the same method. It doesn't add the WAE.

Rank	Team	Opponent	PR_T	Points	RP	Point%	RD	Time	RTp
1	Broncos	Browns	4.687	17	21.70	0.71	26.51	2471	78.12
2	Cowboys	Commanders	4.620	35	28.73	0.82	25.44	2307	55.10
3	49ers	Seahawks	4.062	18	17.80	0.70	20.22	2591	68.82
4	Ravens	Chargers	3.580	10	12.10	0.67	18.78	1553	61.18
5	Packers	Lions	3.520	7	11.30	0.57	11.15	2156	79.82
6	Dolphins	Jets	2.984	21	15.60	0.72	14.71	1800	25.06
7	Rams	Cardinals	2.842	23	14.64	0.73	12.89	1859	24.24
8	Eagles	Bills	2.739	3	12.45	0.52	12.86	0	24.85
9	Falcons	Saints	2.506	9	10.60	0.62	13.48	597	14.94
10	Chiefs	Raiders	2.401	14	9.64	0.65	8.73	1455	23.93
11	Jaguars	Texans	2.236	3	6.00	0.53	6.70	680	30.52
12	Steelers	Bengals	1.971	6	3.60	0.62	8.73	483	16.67
13	Colts	Buccaneers	1.869	7	6.20	0.57	6.43	450	8.49
14	Bears	Vikings	1.813	2	4.09	0.55	6.93	10	10.35
15	Bills	Eagles	1.791	-3	3.10	0.48	4.18	0	19.24
16	Titans	Panthers	1.284	7	-4.20	0.63	0.18	1800	21.66
17	Chargers	Ravens	0.959	-10	1.55	0.33	-3.47	-1553	-6.26
18	Texans	Jaguars	0.862	-3	-0.40	0.47	-0.34	-680	-14.20
19	Buccaneers	Colts	0.440	-7	-7.60	0.43	-8.06	-450	2.69
20	Giants	Patriots	0.244	3	-6.70	0.59	-3.97	490	-22.48
21	Vikings	Bears	0.149	-2	-7.09	0.45	-9.97	-10	-11.40
22	Raiders	Chiefs	0.145	-14	-7.90	0.35	-6.74	-1455	-17.54
23	Seahawks	49ers	-0.038	-18	-5.80	0.30	-6.46	-2591	-35.78
24	Bengals	Steelers	-0.388	-6	-8.90	0.38	-15.56	-483	-23.66
25	Lions	Packers	-0.441	-7	-6.20	0.43	-5.87	-2156	-60.29
26	Saints	Falcons	-0.706	-9	-11.80	0.38	-14.99	-597	-35.32
27	Jets	Dolphins	-0.937	-21	-14.30	0.28	-16.17	-1800	-38.44
28	Patriots	Giants	-1.439	-3	-15.36	0.41	-24.49	-490	-43.81
29	Commanders	Cowboys	-1.461	-35	-22.30	0.18	-18.51	-2307	-39.13
30	Panthers	Titans	-1.470	-7	-11.60	0.37	-18.98	-1800	-71.57
31	Browns	Broncos	-2.390	-17	-22.10	0.29	-25.99	-2471	-76.32
32	Cardinals	Rams	-2.396	-23	-25.50	0.27	-25.56	-1859	-67.25

[–] Downtown_Conflict_53@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know what any of this means and I’m scared, but I see broncos nr1 so I’m happy!

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] velociraptorfarmer@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey everyone! Back for another week of my computer power rankings (CGPR in the table above). I've been doing these for about 7 years, and haven't made any changes since the 2018 season now.

As always, this ranking is based on win percentage, win percentage in your last 5 games, average point differential, and adjusted strength of schedule, which is your strength of schedule with your games against your opponents removed.

Rank	Team	Record	Effective Rank	Index	Index Change	Rank Change	Win/Loss L5	Adj SOS	Point Diff
1	Eagles	10-1	1.0	0.883	0.053	-	5-0	0.509	64
2	Ravens	9-3	3.5	0.823	-0.002	-	4-1	0.529	137
3	Cowboys	8-3	5.9	0.765	0.011	-	4-1	0.395	162
4	49ers	8-3	6.2	0.756	0.070	+4	3-2	0.522	140
5	Jaguars	8-3	6.9	0.739	0.021	+2	4-1	0.577	29
6	Chiefs	8-3	6.9	0.739	0.019	-	3-2	0.584	75
7	Dolphins	8-3	8.6	0.699	0.023	+2	3-2	0.434	88
8	Lions	8-3	10.5	0.654	-0.099	-4	3-2	0.469	36
9	Browns	7-4	10.7	0.648	-0.100	-4	3-2	0.575	30
10	Broncos	6-5	11.5	0.629	0.107	+5	5-0	0.522	-34
11	Steelers	7-4	13.1	0.590	0.028	+2	3-2	0.580	-23
12	Texans	6-5	13.6	0.577	-0.075	-2	3-2	0.491	27
13	Bills	6-6	13.9	0.571	-0.023	-1	2-3	0.472	101
14	Colts	6-5	14.9	0.546	0.080	+4	3-2	0.486	1
15	Vikings	6-6	15.0	0.544	-0.079	-4	3-2	0.475	21
16	Packers	5-6	15.9	0.522	0.097	+4	3-2	0.504	7
17	Rams	5-6	18.2	0.465	0.043	+4	2-3	0.527	-2
18	Seahawks	6-5	18.4	0.460	-0.091	-4	2-3	0.465	-20
19	Chargers	4-7	18.9	0.449	-0.017	-2	2-3	0.544	11
20	Bengals	5-6	19.1	0.443	-0.074	-4	2-3	0.553	-30
21	Saints	5-6	19.7	0.430	-0.030	-2	2-3	0.402	7
22	Falcons	5-6	20.7	0.406	0.088	+3	2-3	0.416	-19
23	Raiders	5-7	21.8	0.379	-0.016	-1	2-3	0.480	-54
24	Titans	4-7	22.1	0.372	0.082	+3	2-3	0.486	-39
25	Buccaneers	4-7	22.4	0.364	-0.022	-2	1-4	0.540	-15
26	Bears	4-8	23.8	0.329	0.030	-	2-3	0.435	-54
27	Jets	4-7	25.4	0.291	-0.079	-3	1-4	0.526	-75
28	Giants	4-8	26.3	0.268	0.013	+1	2-3	0.456	-133
29	Commanders	4-8	27.6	0.236	-0.028	-1	1-4	0.472	-104
30	Patriots	2-9	29.7	0.185	-0.006	-	1-4	0.518	-100
31	Cardinals	2-10	30.4	0.168	-0.020	-	1-4	0.504	-115
32	Panthers	1-10	32.0	0.130	-0.009	-	1-4	0.500	-119

And here's the strength of schedules so far:

Rank	Team	Adjusted SOS	Adjusted Opp Record	Remaining Opp Record
1	Chiefs	0.584	66-47	27-41
2	Steelers	0.580	65-47	30-38
3	Jaguars	0.577	64-47	30-37
4	Browns	0.575	65-48	32-35
5	Bengals	0.553	63-51	42-25
6	Chargers	0.544	62-52	33-35
7	Buccaneers	0.540	61-52	25-41
8	Ravens	0.529	64-57	36-19
9	Rams	0.527	59-53	37-32
10	Jets	0.526	60-54	32-35
11	49ers	0.522	59-54	36-33
12	Broncos	0.522	60-55	29-38
13	Patriots	0.518	59-55	35-32
14	Eagles	0.509	58-56	32-37
15	Packers	0.504	57-56	27-42
16	Cardinals	0.504	62-61	35-21
17	Panthers	0.500	56-56	31-35
18	Texans	0.491	55-57	31-35
19	Colts	0.486	54-57	32-35
20	Titans	0.486	54-57	40-26
21	Raiders	0.480	59-64	30-26
22	Vikings	0.475	58-64	31-25
23	Commanders	0.472	59-66	33-22
24	Bills	0.472	58-65	30-25
25	Lions	0.469	53-60	35-34
26	Seahawks	0.465	53-61	39-28
27	Giants	0.456	57-68	35-20
28	Bears	0.435	54-70	27-29
29	Dolphins	0.434	49-64	35-34
30	Falcons	0.416	47-66	24-43
31	Saints	0.402	45-67	27-40
32	Cowboys	0.395	45-69	42-26

[–] modernzen@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

This is the closest we've been to the Chiefs in a very long time.

Also, QQ - are the Chiefs and Jaguars actually tied, or is it just a rounding thing? Would it be possible to include an extra digit to disambiguate?

[–] BlueHighwindz@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yahoo is the only website not too cowardly to rank us in the Top 10, I see.

[–] BeerholicsAnonymous@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

The ravens should be #2 behind the niners

[–] rob_var@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Makes no sense for the chiefs to be above us, I know mahomes is mahomes but we are a way more rounded team.

[–] bartscrc@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

4 NFC teams and 9 AFC teams in the top 13. How do we petition for realignment?

load more comments