this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

76 readers
7 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

| | Team | SI | SN | Y! | B/R | CBS | USA | NFL | ESPN | Avg | SD | CGPR | |


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


| | 1 | Philadelphia (0) | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1 | | 2 | San Francisco (0) | | 2 | 2 | 3 | | 2 | | 2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 4 | | 3 | Kansas City (0) | | 3 | 3 | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 6 | | 4 | Baltimore (1) | | 4 | 4 | 4 | | 4 | | 3 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 2 | | 5 | Dallas (1) | | 7 | 7 | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 3 | | 6 | Miami (2) | | 5 | 6 | 6 | | 6 | | 6 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 7 | | 7 | Detroit (-3) | | 8 | 5 | 8 | | 7 | | 7 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 8 | | 8 | Jacksonville (1) | | 6 | 8 | 7 | | 8 | | 8 | 7.4 | 0.9 | 5 | | 9 | Buffalo (2) | | 13 | 10 | 9 | | 11 | | 10 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 13 | | 10 | Pittsburgh (4) | | 9 | 13 | 12 | | 10 | | 9 | 10.6 | 1.8 | 11 | | 11 | Houston (-1) | | 12 | 12 | 10 | | 9 | | 12 | 11.0 | 1.4 | 12 | | 12 | Denver (3) | | 10 | 9 | 11 | | 13 | | 13 | 11.2 | 1.8 | 10 | | 13 | Cleveland (-5) | | 11 | 11 | 14 | | 14 | | 11 | 12.2 | 1.6 | 9 | | 14 | Seattle (-2) | | 14 | 14 | 13 | | 17 | | 14 | 14.4 | 1.5 | 18 | | 15 | Indianapolis (3) | | 15 | 16 | 15 | | 15 | | 18 | 15.8 | 1.3 | 14 | | 16 | Minnesota (-2) | | 16 | 20 | 16 | | 18 | | 15 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 15 | | 17 | LA Rams (5) | | 18 | 21 | 19 | | 12 | | 16 | 17.2 | 3.4 | 17 | | 18 | Green Bay (6) | | 25 | 15 | 18 | | 16 | | 17 | 18.2 | 4.0 | 16 | | 19 | Atlanta (4) | | 19 | 17 | 17 | | 20 | | 20 | 18.6 | 1.5 | 22 | | 20 | Cincinnati (-4) | | 17 | 19 | 21 | | 26 | | 19 | 20.4 | 3.4 | 20 | | 21 | New Orleans (-4) | | 20 | 18 | 20 | | 24 | | 21 | 20.6 | 2.2 | 21 | | 22 | LA Chargers (-3) | | 22 | 23 | 22 | | 21 | | 24 | 22.4 | 1.1 | 19 | | 23 | Las Vegas (-3) | | 21 | 22 | 26 | | 22 | | 22 | 22.6 | 1.9 | 23 | | 24 | Tampa Bay (-3) | | 23 | 25 | 24 | | 23 | | 23 | 23.6 | 0.9 | 25 | | 25 | Tennessee (2) | | 24 | 27 | 25 | | 19 | | 26 | 24.2 | 3.1 | 24 | | 26 | NY Jets (-1) | | 26 | 24 | 23 | | 27 | | 28 | 25.6 | 2.1 | 27 | | 27 | Chicago (1) | | 27 | 26 | 29 | | 25 | | 27 | 26.8 | 1.5 | 26 | | 28 | Washington (-2) | | 29 | 28 | 27 | | 30 | | 25 | 27.8 | 1.9 | 29 | | 29 | NY Giants (1) | | 28 | 29 | 28 | | 28 | | 29 | 28.4 | 0.5 | 28 | | 30 | Arizona (-1) | | 30 | 30 | 30 | | 29 | | 30 | 29.8 | 0.4 | 31 | | 31 | New England (0) | | 31 | 31 | 31 | | 31 | | 31 | 31.0 | 0.0 | 30 | | 32 | Carolina (0) | | 32 | 32 | 32 | | 32 | | 32 | 32.0 | 0.0 | 32 |

[SN] ( https://www.sportingnews.com/ca/nfl/news/nfl-power-rankings-chiefs-cowboys-browns-broncos-packers/3eda3afe4d6307fc2adc9bbe )

Y!

B/R

CBS

USA

NFL

ESPN

[SI] ( )

[CGPR] ( https://old.reddit.com/user/velociraptorfarmer/comments/185prn9/2023_week_12_nfl_power_rankings/ )

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] U_R_A_BoldOne@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Largest standard deviation in the league, baby!

[–] Economy_Cactus@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What did we ever do to SN?

[–] brannock_@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We're ranked #17 by SN... not sure why it's listed as 25.

[–] Economy_Cactus@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What did we ever do to u/mikebiox

[–] WMINWMO@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Well he is a Lions fan soooo..... 30 years of torment.

[–] LazyTitan___@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

People have no idea with the NFC wild card hunt teams

[–] Comprehensive_Main@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I fail to see why Buffalo remains that high. They are 6-6

[–] NY-NC@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I fail to see why Comprehensive_Main puts 49ers flair on his Reddit account when he’s very clearly not a 49ers fan

[–] its_JustColin@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Who are you gonna put ahead of them? Lmao

[–] triplec787@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

How about the team that currently has a better record and beat them two weeks ago.

[–] Matman142@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

distant neighing sounds

[–] Jamesaaronm@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

With the loss to the bears and the lose of Kirk Cousins i think the Packers (Jordan love has been great last 2 games) should be higher on the list then the Vikings at this point.

[–] Funnypenguin97@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Goddamn lol. I know we sucked last week and I don't necessarily disagree, but man moving from 4 to 7 sucks butt

[–] TMNBortles@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Up-and-coming cat teams do not get the benefit of the doubt.

[–] unique_username-_-72@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Tbh it’s been the last two weeks. The bears just put up 12 points on the Vikings and you guys squeaked by. I still think the lions are good but you can’t ignore things like that

[–] Loorrac@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Who cares, it means nothing

[–] jexmex@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they are not lying, Lions need to clean up defense and offensive line. Goff has to get control of himself again, but to do that he needs help from the OL too.

[–] Funnypenguin97@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I mean last week was the only time I thought the Oline reallyyyyy struggled. I don't think it's much of a concern. Goff does this sometimes where he has bad games.

Problem with the last two games is that they couldn't get the momentum they wanted early. Setting up the run is hugly important and we fell away from that. I'm not terribly worried, but we can't come out flat against a pretty bad saints team

[–] ArmiinTamzarian@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This power rankings are wrong. I don't see the Broncos at 2.5 nor at 3.5 or 4.5 for that matter

[–] BendubzGaming@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No mention of Amon-RaRaRaRaRa either

[–] AutomateAway@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

we definitely need a column for the Perna rankings

[–] AdaAstra@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

We should add Perna and Grossi power ranking column.

[–] fuckdangilbert@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think the SN one is wrong. GB is 17 on the current rankings, not 25.

[–] MrIrrelevantsHypeMan@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

They finally got us ranked properly

[–] Kahp_R@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The pretentiousness of some of this articles when writing about the Steelers lmao. "They are going to make the playoffs even though I feel like they shouldn't, and that pisses me off."

[–] gyman122@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Tbf that’s every non-Steelers NFL fan

[–] EggplantAlpinism@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Can confirm

[–] axxl75@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Tbf there are a lot of Steelers "fans" saying that too. So many people rooting against the team just because they don't want to be 1 and done in the playoffs again.

Making the playoffs this season would be a pretty good accomplishment IMO regardless of how far they got.

[–] UglyDuckAI@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Where is the pretentiousness?

[–] Kahp_R@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Yahoo: "At least the Steelers finally outgained an opponent. This team is probably going to the playoffs, though it still doesn't look like a playoff-level team."

[–] GimbleJ@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Bengals still being at 20th is way too high. Most likely will not win another game this year. Terrible defense, no run game, a low-tier backup QB and a coach who is utterly lost without everything being perfect. ~30th would be more accurate and I'm sure they'll be near there by the end of December.

[–] PadstheFish@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'll gladly take being the worst 8-3 team in the league. This feels really weird lmao

[–] qp0n@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Personally im pretty angry about being ranked the worst 10-1 team.

[–] byniri_returns@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I'm still bitter about last Thursday

[–] MaroonedOctopus@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At the start of this season we were talking about how much greater AFC teams and AFC QBs were than the NFC.

Now, the top 2 teams in the league are NFC teams. An NFC QB is the favorite to win the MVP award.

[–] axxl75@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The narrative preseason was how hard it would be to make the playoffs in the AFC because of all the good QBs. As in there were a lot of good QBs not that the AFC necessarily had the best singular QB or team.

Rodgers got hurt
Tua is playing well
Allen hasn't lived up to expectations this year
Mahomes is still Mahomes
Wilson has been much better lately
Herbert IMO is overhyped but the Chargers are perennial offseason favorites
Lamar is still good
Burrow was hurt and got hurt again
Stroud is looking good

Without really making any stretches, that's 9 QBs who were either rightfully hyped in the offseason (whether it turned out true or not) or have overperformed.

In the NFC you have

Hurts
Dak
Stafford
Maybe Goff
Cousins

[–] glago93@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

You forgot Trevor Lawrence

[–] BWasTaken@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just happy to be invited to the party.

[–] modernzen@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Weren't we 31st at some point? Wild.

[–] M44PolishMosin@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably after giving up 70 points

[–] justainsel@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I miss those days

[–] OnePieceAce@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Everything is going the Packers way the last few weeks including Jets/Bills picks getting better. Maybe we are God's favorite team till the NFCCG

[–] JeddHampton@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For anyone that is interested here is the results from my algorithms with explanations of what they mean below.

Rank City Team PR_T RP RD RTp WAE Bounce
1 San Francisco 49ers 2.241 13.29 15.06 39.37 2.74 -2.44
2 Baltimore Ravens 2.191 11.62 14.45 40.72 3.46 -1.24
3 Dallas Cowboys 1.513 11.38 11.26 18.54 1.42 -2.32
4 Kansas City Chiefs 1.512 7.44 8.09 28.37 3.34 0.68
5 Philadelphia Eagles 1.396 6.88 6.84 18.96 4.70 3.15
6 Jacksonville Jaguars 1.116 5.52 5.74 15.82 3.48 2.08
7 Cleveland Browns 0.914 4.06 7.95 8.60 2.36 0.94
8 Detroit Lions 0.818 3.27 4.97 13.57 2.25 1.06
9 Buffalo Bills 0.751 5.71 5.69 14.69 -0.45 -2.94
10 Miami Dolphins 0.686 5.50 2.77 7.13 1.76 0.69
11 Los Angeles Chargers 0.627 3.81 4.40 19.78 -1.02 -3.47
12 Minnesota Vikings 0.446 2.15 3.29 12.34 -0.20 -1.65
13 Houston Texans 0.319 1.62 1.71 7.22 0.40 -0.33
14 Indianapolis Colts 0.297 -0.16 1.49 12.80 0.25 -0.50
15 Green Bay Packers 0.236 0.82 1.77 3.74 0.55 0.15
16 Pittsburgh Steelers 0.153 0.13 -0.68 -2.92 2.40 3.29
17 Cincinnati Bengals 0.063 0.17 -2.54 9.50 -0.01 -0.20
18 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.055 1.03 1.04 2.88 -1.06 -1.82
19 Denver Broncos -0.005 -2.32 -0.04 2.61 0.74 1.17
20 Los Angeles Rams -0.125 0.49 -0.65 -8.33 0.11 0.55
21 New Orleans Saints -0.456 -1.57 -1.90 -9.86 -1.48 -0.95
22 Seattle Seahawks -0.517 -3.30 -3.24 -12.89 0.01 1.56
23 Tennessee Titans -0.829 -3.92 -5.33 -15.24 -1.65 -0.09
24 Atlanta Falcons -0.938 -4.06 -5.61 -22.44 -1.33 0.74
25 Chicago Bears -0.996 -6.12 -6.32 -11.03 -2.79 -1.30
26 New York Jets -1.104 -5.01 -7.97 -23.49 -1.30 1.27
27 Las Vegas Raiders -1.188 -6.38 -7.43 -21.59 -2.24 0.11
28 Washington Commanders -1.662 -11.04 -12.61 -20.79 -2.55 1.07
29 Arizona Cardinals -1.794 -8.91 -12.07 -29.20 -4.05 -0.85
30 New England Patriots -1.884 -8.59 -12.80 -34.87 -3.50 0.19
31 Carolina Panthers -1.904 -9.95 -11.50 -29.70 -4.50 -1.32
32 New York Giants -1.917 -11.36 -14.32 -30.20 -2.64 1.68

PR_T is the ranking number here. It is an average of RP, RD, and RT (all using standard deviation in an attempt to give them equal weight), and then add in the WAE.

RP is a mean average of how many points the team scores against the average opponents' scores. Losing by 3 points to a team that usually wins by 10 nets 7 points to the total (before dividing by games played). Beating a team by 3 points that usually loses by 7 nets -4 to the total (before dividing by games played).

RD is very similar to RP except it is what percentage of the score was by the team. A team that beat another by 30-20 had 60% of the score. This again is compared to the opponent's opponents average. The teams score is the mean average of that.

RP favors offense a bit where RD favors defense a bit.

RT is one that I started tracking a few year ago. It is like RP and RD, but instead of using points it uses time. The winning team gains the seconds remaining in regulation after the winning score and the losing team gets that time subtracted. It is also compared against the opponent's opponents average and is presented in standard deviation from the mean form. The value here is divided by 36 to make it more like a percentage of a game as opposed to raw seconds. This has been pretty darn good as a power ranking method.

WAE is "Wins Above/Against Expectation". This uses the strength of schedule and win% to give a rough estimate on how many wins the team is above or below what an average team would have with the schedule that has been played. An average team with a .500 schedule would expect to be .500. An average team with a .600 schedule would expect to be .400. If you multiply the WAE by how many games have been played, it shows how many games the team won or lost compared to what an average team would be expected to do.

Bounce (formerly "Over") is something else that I'm monitoring. I created it last year specifically because the of the Vikings season. This column is a measurement of how teams are performing against the stats. I'm still trying to work my head around it. A zero here does not mean the team is playing exactly as the stats I made up suggest. This is not completely worked out.

Regardless, the lower the number in the Bounce column is the more a team is losing more than it probably should. The higher the number, the more the team is winning when it probably should lose. For reference, last year after week 16 (last I ran the numbers that season), the Vikings were 5.070 in this column. The next highest was the Colts at 2.399. The lowest was the 49ers at -2.887.

Below is the rated performance of each team this week using mostly the same method. It doesn't add the WAE.

Rank Team Opponent PR_T Points RP Point% RD Time RTp
1 Broncos Browns 4.687 17 21.70 0.71 26.51 2471 78.12
2 Cowboys Commanders 4.620 35 28.73 0.82 25.44 2307 55.10
3 49ers Seahawks 4.062 18 17.80 0.70 20.22 2591 68.82
4 Ravens Chargers 3.580 10 12.10 0.67 18.78 1553 61.18
5 Packers Lions 3.520 7 11.30 0.57 11.15 2156 79.82
6 Dolphins Jets 2.984 21 15.60 0.72 14.71 1800 25.06
7 Rams Cardinals 2.842 23 14.64 0.73 12.89 1859 24.24
8 Eagles Bills 2.739 3 12.45 0.52 12.86 0 24.85
9 Falcons Saints 2.506 9 10.60 0.62 13.48 597 14.94
10 Chiefs Raiders 2.401 14 9.64 0.65 8.73 1455 23.93
11 Jaguars Texans 2.236 3 6.00 0.53 6.70 680 30.52
12 Steelers Bengals 1.971 6 3.60 0.62 8.73 483 16.67
13 Colts Buccaneers 1.869 7 6.20 0.57 6.43 450 8.49
14 Bears Vikings 1.813 2 4.09 0.55 6.93 10 10.35
15 Bills Eagles 1.791 -3 3.10 0.48 4.18 0 19.24
16 Titans Panthers 1.284 7 -4.20 0.63 0.18 1800 21.66
17 Chargers Ravens 0.959 -10 1.55 0.33 -3.47 -1553 -6.26
18 Texans Jaguars 0.862 -3 -0.40 0.47 -0.34 -680 -14.20
19 Buccaneers Colts 0.440 -7 -7.60 0.43 -8.06 -450 2.69
20 Giants Patriots 0.244 3 -6.70 0.59 -3.97 490 -22.48
21 Vikings Bears 0.149 -2 -7.09 0.45 -9.97 -10 -11.40
22 Raiders Chiefs 0.145 -14 -7.90 0.35 -6.74 -1455 -17.54
23 Seahawks 49ers -0.038 -18 -5.80 0.30 -6.46 -2591 -35.78
24 Bengals Steelers -0.388 -6 -8.90 0.38 -15.56 -483 -23.66
25 Lions Packers -0.441 -7 -6.20 0.43 -5.87 -2156 -60.29
26 Saints Falcons -0.706 -9 -11.80 0.38 -14.99 -597 -35.32
27 Jets Dolphins -0.937 -21 -14.30 0.28 -16.17 -1800 -38.44
28 Patriots Giants -1.439 -3 -15.36 0.41 -24.49 -490 -43.81
29 Commanders Cowboys -1.461 -35 -22.30 0.18 -18.51 -2307 -39.13
30 Panthers Titans -1.470 -7 -11.60 0.37 -18.98 -1800 -71.57
31 Browns Broncos -2.390 -17 -22.10 0.29 -25.99 -2471 -76.32
32 Cardinals Rams -2.396 -23 -25.50 0.27 -25.56 -1859 -67.25
[–] Downtown_Conflict_53@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what any of this means and I’m scared, but I see broncos nr1 so I’m happy!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] velociraptorfarmer@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey everyone! Back for another week of my computer power rankings (CGPR in the table above). I've been doing these for about 7 years, and haven't made any changes since the 2018 season now.

As always, this ranking is based on win percentage, win percentage in your last 5 games, average point differential, and adjusted strength of schedule, which is your strength of schedule with your games against your opponents removed.

Rank Team Record Effective Rank Index Index Change Rank Change Win/Loss L5 Adj SOS Point Diff
1 Eagles 10-1 1.0 0.883 0.053 - 5-0 0.509 64
2 Ravens 9-3 3.5 0.823 -0.002 - 4-1 0.529 137
3 Cowboys 8-3 5.9 0.765 0.011 - 4-1 0.395 162
4 49ers 8-3 6.2 0.756 0.070 +4 3-2 0.522 140
5 Jaguars 8-3 6.9 0.739 0.021 +2 4-1 0.577 29
6 Chiefs 8-3 6.9 0.739 0.019 - 3-2 0.584 75
7 Dolphins 8-3 8.6 0.699 0.023 +2 3-2 0.434 88
8 Lions 8-3 10.5 0.654 -0.099 -4 3-2 0.469 36
9 Browns 7-4 10.7 0.648 -0.100 -4 3-2 0.575 30
10 Broncos 6-5 11.5 0.629 0.107 +5 5-0 0.522 -34
11 Steelers 7-4 13.1 0.590 0.028 +2 3-2 0.580 -23
12 Texans 6-5 13.6 0.577 -0.075 -2 3-2 0.491 27
13 Bills 6-6 13.9 0.571 -0.023 -1 2-3 0.472 101
14 Colts 6-5 14.9 0.546 0.080 +4 3-2 0.486 1
15 Vikings 6-6 15.0 0.544 -0.079 -4 3-2 0.475 21
16 Packers 5-6 15.9 0.522 0.097 +4 3-2 0.504 7
17 Rams 5-6 18.2 0.465 0.043 +4 2-3 0.527 -2
18 Seahawks 6-5 18.4 0.460 -0.091 -4 2-3 0.465 -20
19 Chargers 4-7 18.9 0.449 -0.017 -2 2-3 0.544 11
20 Bengals 5-6 19.1 0.443 -0.074 -4 2-3 0.553 -30
21 Saints 5-6 19.7 0.430 -0.030 -2 2-3 0.402 7
22 Falcons 5-6 20.7 0.406 0.088 +3 2-3 0.416 -19
23 Raiders 5-7 21.8 0.379 -0.016 -1 2-3 0.480 -54
24 Titans 4-7 22.1 0.372 0.082 +3 2-3 0.486 -39
25 Buccaneers 4-7 22.4 0.364 -0.022 -2 1-4 0.540 -15
26 Bears 4-8 23.8 0.329 0.030 - 2-3 0.435 -54
27 Jets 4-7 25.4 0.291 -0.079 -3 1-4 0.526 -75
28 Giants 4-8 26.3 0.268 0.013 +1 2-3 0.456 -133
29 Commanders 4-8 27.6 0.236 -0.028 -1 1-4 0.472 -104
30 Patriots 2-9 29.7 0.185 -0.006 - 1-4 0.518 -100
31 Cardinals 2-10 30.4 0.168 -0.020 - 1-4 0.504 -115
32 Panthers 1-10 32.0 0.130 -0.009 - 1-4 0.500 -119

And here's the strength of schedules so far:

Rank Team Adjusted SOS Adjusted Opp Record Remaining Opp Record
1 Chiefs 0.584 66-47 27-41
2 Steelers 0.580 65-47 30-38
3 Jaguars 0.577 64-47 30-37
4 Browns 0.575 65-48 32-35
5 Bengals 0.553 63-51 42-25
6 Chargers 0.544 62-52 33-35
7 Buccaneers 0.540 61-52 25-41
8 Ravens 0.529 64-57 36-19
9 Rams 0.527 59-53 37-32
10 Jets 0.526 60-54 32-35
11 49ers 0.522 59-54 36-33
12 Broncos 0.522 60-55 29-38
13 Patriots 0.518 59-55 35-32
14 Eagles 0.509 58-56 32-37
15 Packers 0.504 57-56 27-42
16 Cardinals 0.504 62-61 35-21
17 Panthers 0.500 56-56 31-35
18 Texans 0.491 55-57 31-35
19 Colts 0.486 54-57 32-35
20 Titans 0.486 54-57 40-26
21 Raiders 0.480 59-64 30-26
22 Vikings 0.475 58-64 31-25
23 Commanders 0.472 59-66 33-22
24 Bills 0.472 58-65 30-25
25 Lions 0.469 53-60 35-34
26 Seahawks 0.465 53-61 39-28
27 Giants 0.456 57-68 35-20
28 Bears 0.435 54-70 27-29
29 Dolphins 0.434 49-64 35-34
30 Falcons 0.416 47-66 24-43
31 Saints 0.402 45-67 27-40
32 Cowboys 0.395 45-69 42-26
[–] modernzen@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This is the closest we've been to the Chiefs in a very long time.

Also, QQ - are the Chiefs and Jaguars actually tied, or is it just a rounding thing? Would it be possible to include an extra digit to disambiguate?

[–] BlueHighwindz@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Yahoo is the only website not too cowardly to rank us in the Top 10, I see.

[–] BeerholicsAnonymous@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The ravens should be #2 behind the niners

[–] rob_var@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Makes no sense for the chiefs to be above us, I know mahomes is mahomes but we are a way more rounded team.

[–] bartscrc@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

4 NFC teams and 9 AFC teams in the top 13. How do we petition for realignment?

load more comments
view more: next ›