this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
103 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34783 readers
1886 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

To be fair I don't remember anyone from 600 years in the future.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I imagine some archivists might find the lost fragments of this server is some ruins and by some miracle, maybe extract this very thread.

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We all will be living inside the weights of LLMs from this era.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok that's actually an interesting use of AI. Train on only media from that time period. This is Daniel, from the year 1400. Tell me about the Catholic Church

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fat chance, we're not carving things on glass or stone. SSDs and HDDs lose their contents and are irrecoverable even within our own lifetimes

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You are most likely right but it really depends on what we come up with in the future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

There's a running phrase that gets' mentioned a lot in the Peanuts comic strip: "500 years from now, who'll know the difference?"

Just wanted to mention that. Peace ✌️

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Dude I’ll forget you ever existed when I leave this thread. Bye.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gonna be awkward as fuck if there is an afterlife and you run into OP after you both expire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Brave of you to assume that humanity will exist in 600 years.

Actually, we might be, but the better-off ones will be back at sticks and stones and huddling around wood fires and the like.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I really doubt this. Humanity is really good at surviving things.

My prediction - at a certain point, we gain the ability to port human brains to computers. The most wealthy gain this tech first, and effectively become immortal. Using their wealth (which is likely always accumulating) they are able to afford lots of redundency and good tech + energy to function at extremely high levels of performance - essentially making them immortal gods. I assume they will form alliances and rivalries, and stake out ground based on the now-general-intelligence AIs they have created.

Most people who choose transhumanism after this will need to utilize their afterlife continuing to work in order to pay for the ongoing cost of running their servers.

Meanwhile, humans still made of meat will have started conducting experiments on their genetics. Initially this will be about simply reducing or removing the chance of carrying a genetic disease. But soon they will start working on how to generally be better than others - improved cognitive abilities; sexier, stronger bodies; improved emotional regulation. Not long after, it will start being considered irresponsible to have children without the standard genetic modifications that the middle class can afford. Permanent class stratifications will be etched into dna. Even further along, the rich take genetic modification into fashion, creating physical markers of class stratification which will gradually make them look less human. As genetic class differences widen, there will be increasing class wars - in each one, the upper classes and those aligned with them will eliminate more and more of the lower classes. Slavery will also make a comeback, as those without genetic modifications (or with sufficiently lesser modifications) will be deemed too irresponsible to manage their own affairs and function in society. The descendents of the ultra-rich transhumanist gods, who will have the best and most fashionable genetic modifications, will be the first to achieve immortality in the flesh. But there will probably develop a sort of cultural expectation that they eventually give up their flesh and become transhumans like their anscestors.

Therefore, I will not have children unless I earn enough to afford their genetic modifications. To do otherwise would be irresponsible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, but AIs will be able to generate a statistically accurate simulacrum of a set of people like us.

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think humanity is going to make it another 600 years tbh

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think humans might, but we won't have fancy skyscrapers, we'll be living in bunkers hiding from whatever disaster (war, plague, radiation, alien invasion) is on the surface.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

An alien invasion couldn't possibly make things worse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't even take that long. My parent passed away and left boxes of pictures from 50 to 75 years ago and no one recognizes. Why did they have these pictures and boxes of them? No notes. Nothing.

[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

As they say in preservation, metadata is key.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gigachad@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I am doing Genealogy as a hobby and in most of the lines I am in the 18the century, in some in the 17th century.

What I learned during this hobby is a simple thing - the more generations you go back, the more ancestors you have - the formula is 2^n. So if you go back 10 generations, you have roughly 1,024 ancestors.

Now imagine how many descendants these people have? I have met plenty of others nerds who are also doing genealogy, cousins by 7the grade and so on. There is always some dude doing this stuff, so I am pretty sure there will be one in the future.

Of course I can only go back about 300-350 years, but we people today are leaving way more traces on this planet than my ancestors in the 17th century.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the formula is 2^n

This breaks down eventually. Eventually, incest.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's why I said roughly. The genealogical concept behind this is Ahnenschwund or pedigree collapse.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Fair enough. I just wanted to make an incest joke

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

History from this period will feast or famine. If the Internet Archive is preserved long term, then your words on the Internet will be there. If not, then bitrot will happen within decades.

The feast result will be an interesting one for historians. We don't usually have historical records about common people of any era more than a century or two back. "History is written by the victors" isn't quite right. History is written by writers, and for most of history, those would be educated upper class people.

Historians love finding Roman graffiti, even when it's about some guy's giant cock. So yes, they'll be interested in your memes, too.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You never know, look at Ea Nasir.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

My name is on some US patents. Out of anything, I expect those to have the best odds of surviving for 600 years. Of course no one will look them up in 600 years unless they have really niche interests.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

No, and I wouldn't have it any other way.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No, and I'm thankful for that

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 week ago

Relative to a normal life, nobody knows me now... and with where and how I live that likely won't change.

So definitely not, aside from the unlikely event I could get my head preserved (likely questionable testing). Then again I know in all likelihood that wouldn't work, so I'm not sure getting a mention in some niche Wikipedia article would be the same as being remembered.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There was a pic of my great-great-grandparents on the wall. No idea what their name was.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you think that's important?

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depend depends upon the reason That they’re being remembered. For example of someone who came up the cure for cancer you would hope they’d be remembered.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd rather the cure be remembered than that name of who discovered it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›