this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
422 points (99.8% liked)

People Twitter

8349 readers
2841 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, cuz my life isn't fucked up enough already or anything, now I have to worry about random cars giving me the side eye because I don't already like them enough?

Tf weird ass dystopia even is this?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine a car, malfunctioning, looking at you while it hits you.

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Sounds like my ex, only it can actually drive itself....

[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is a real psychological effect to it. I think Mercedes was first to test it years ago. not with eyes but with a long LED light strip in the upper area of the front window. The goal was to communicate the "attention" of the vehicle to a pedestrian waiting to cross the street in a similar way that real drivers catch eye contact with pedestrians. This reassures the pedestrian that it is safe to cross the street - hey the guy sees me, I can safely go.

Without this feedback it has been found that people are overly cautious, not trusting the autonomous vehicles and it simply causes stress.

This is a real problem discovered years ago that has a novel funny solution instead of LED strip :)

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In partially automated production processes where robots move around alongside humans, robots may be programmed to “look” in the direction they intend to move before moving. This may be by rotating their chassis or via LEDs/screens. This allows the humans to anticipate the robot’s movements rather than be surprised by it.

This is from a TV documentary I saw years ago, so you won’t get a source for me. Trust me, bro… or don’t.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago

I've heard the same thing with robots giving people space. I heard about some study or another where humans working alongside robots (e.g. robotic arms in a factory) felt a lot more comfortable when robots exaggerated how much distance they put between themselves and the person to signal that they "know" the person is there and won't run into them.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah the idea is solid, the execution.... unsettling!

I think a better solution might be something like a few large lights with aimable lenses and about the level of brightness of a traffic light. The lenses allow you to direct the lighting such that a person being "focused" on sees a clear indicator on the vehicle, but someone outside that focus area would not see the light.

Im sure there's more to it than that, but a way to signal to pedestrians that the vehicle is aware of them and waiting for them to move solves a real problem.

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I much prefer the LED strips lol

[–] EvilFonzy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ello Gov'nor

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Truck-kun is watching you.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Please let the harem be all consenting adults....

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If wishes were horses, there'd be a horse girl harem with the age explained away by comparing it to the lifespan of horses: "She's already middle aged in horse years."

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And it's ok, they want to be your slave.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My local radio was saying that apparently my area is supposed to be getting more Waymos even though people from other places in the country called in just to reinforce that these things are not ready and have been recorded (as in video proof) of having operated in error.

I do not get this country's stubbornness to avoid putting down rail and just letting civilization progress the way it should be: WITHOUT driver-less AI mobile coffins. This is madness.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You sound like you should go yell at some clouds.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Might I recommend Talking to The Moon by Bruno Mars?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I had to do a double take. I thought this was an Onion type story. I'm extremely disappointed in the world.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have read a fan theory that Cars is set in a post apocalyptic world where all the humans are dead. I hadn't thought it was very plausible but I guess I was wrong.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of something...

Street Cleaning robot from Pixar's "Robots" animated film from 2005. Robot has one big awkward eye in the middle that looks around at others while it cleans

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Why does it look so done with our shit already?!

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The problem with this approach is this: If the car indicates that it noticed me, how can I be sure that it won’t decide I’m just a tree within the next millisecond?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Trust them, bro

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Or that you are the weakest link in the chain of causality and that your life is now optional.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you'll be alright, autonomous cars generally avoid hitting trees as well as people

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Indeed, but trees don’t have a habit of stepping onto the road.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s not a Land Rover, that’s the vacuum cleaner from Brave Little Toaster.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Alternatively,

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I was thinking Chevron was gonna take a page out of Nintendo's playbook on Pokemon and try to get in on this.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 6 points 1 week ago

...Brum? Is that you?

Thing looks like it wants to suck the marrow from your bones.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Had the opportunity to make it cute

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

congrats on giving millennials ptsd jaguar

"air conditioner from brave little toaster"

[–] RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The brave little toaster?

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Cool I can stare a car in the eye even as it runs me over anyway.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Note this was 2018.

IIRC Mercedes was testing this too.