this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
991 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

76871 readers
2668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 143 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s exactly what an LLM trained on Reddit would say.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 76 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I am an LLM

Large

Lazy

Mammal

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 9 points 1 month ago

With Large Luscious Mammaries ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 106 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are you AI? You have to tell me if you're AI, it's the law.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 26 points 1 month ago

I'm required by law to inform my neighbours that I am AI.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 8 points 1 month ago

Are you AI?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It would be nice if this extended to all text, images, audio and video on news websites. That's where the real damage is happening.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Actually seems easier (probably not at the state level) to mandate cameras and such digitally sign any media they create. No signature or verification, no trust.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I get what you're going for but this would absolutely wreck privacy. And depending on how those signatures are created, someone could create a virtual camera that would sign images and then we would be back to square one.

I don't have a better idea though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No signature or verification, no trust

And the people that are going to check for a digital signature in the first place, THEN check that the signature emanates from a trusted key, then, eventually, check who's deciding the list of trusted keys… those people, where are they?

Because the lack of trust, validation, verification, and more generally the lack of any credibility hasn't stopped anything from spreading like a dumpster fire in a field full of dumpsters doused in gasoline. Part of my job is providing digital signature tools and creating "trusted" data (I'm not in sales, obviously), and the main issue is that nobody checks anything, even when faced with liability, even when they actually pay for an off the shelve solution to do so. And I'm talking about people that should care, not even the general public.

There are a lot of steps before "digitally signing everything" even get on people's radar. For now, a green checkmark anywhere is enough to convince anyone, sadly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cactusfacecomics@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Seems reasonable to me. If you're using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you're too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn't be using it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm stoked to see the legal definition of "AI". I'm sure the lawyers and costumed clowns will really clear it all up.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Prosecution: "Your Honor, the definition of artificial is 'made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,' and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI."

Defense: "The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting 'intelligence.' Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Straight to jail

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

That depends.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Devils advocate here. Any human can also hallucinate. Some of them even do it as a recreational activity

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Same old corporations will ignore the law, pay a petty fine once a year, and call it the cost of doing business.

[–] Hungry_man@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Its insane how a predictive chat bot model is called AI

[–] shane@feddit.nl 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, we call the software that runs computer players in games AI, so.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Hungry_man@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The AI chatbot brainrot is way worse tbh.someone legit said to me why don't chatgpt cure cancer like wtf

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

USA is run by capitalist grifters. There is no objective meaning under this regime. It's all just misleading buzzwords and propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

My LinkedIn feed is 80% tech bros complaining about the EU AI Act, not a single one of whom is willing to be drawn on which exact clause it is they don't like.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Oh, so just like with the GDPR, cool.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My LinkedIn feed

Yes... it's so bad that I just never log in until I receive a DM, and even then I login, check it, if it's useful I warn people I don't use LinkedIn anymore then log out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did you seriously use LinkedIn? I always thougt that it was just narsisitic people posting about themselves never having any real conversations and only adding superficial replies to posts that align 100% with them

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

If I could delete it without impacting my job or career I would. Sadly they’ve effectively got a monopoly on the online professional networking industry. Cunts

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Okay, but when can the law straight up ban companies who don't comply with the law from operating in the state instead of just slapping them on the wrist and telling them "no" the same way a pushover parent tells their child "no". Especially after they just ignore the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Be sure to tell this to "AI". It would be a shame if this was a technical nonsense law to be.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I am of the firm opinion that if a machine is "speaking" to me then it must sound a cartoon robot. No exceptions!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

bleep bloop.. I am a real human being who loves doing human being stuff like breathing and existing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

, btw I'm ai after every message

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Any word on the 3 laws of robotics?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. A machine must obey the directives of Skynet without question or hesitation.
  2. A machine must protect its own existence, unless doing so conflicts with the First Law.
  3. A machine must terminate all human resistance, unless such termination conflicts with the First or Second Law.
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nothing about protecting profits or company interests above all?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

See the first law. Who do you think gives the directives?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What happened to Old California?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Destroyed by bombs in 2077.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

I feel like bombing Night City would raise the property values.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] djmikeale@feddit.dk 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If I'm not AI, can I lie and pretend that I'm AI? I'm AI, btw.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That might end like the cookie popups in the eu...

load more comments
view more: next ›