this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
814 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31105 readers
2265 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 170 points 10 months ago (21 children)

It's never happened before because the working class has never been unified nationwide before. Soybean farmers in Utah are not connected to teachers in Boston or steelworkers in Pittsburgh or auto manufacturers in Michigan or nurses in San Diego. There's never been a singular cause that affected all of those groups of people at the same time.

If it ever could happen, it would be because the President was a colossal dipshit who fucked every aspect of the economy across the country, except that would almost certainly cause the legislature to put an end to such rampant and corrupt tyranny.

Right?

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

no, the official party platform of the GOOP is “whatever Drumpf says”.
this party also controls the legislature

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The last time people across the country organized general strike of sorts the government went into action to make a law that made it illegal for unions to organize such a thing.

And with this corrupt Congress and this idiot president and this ridiculous SCOTUS, I think it's likely they will worm their way into making a law that makes it illegal for any citizen to strike for any reason.

Trump already illegally outlawed government unions. And nothing, absolutely nothing, was done about it.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The people strike.

Congress says: that's illegal now!! Go back to work!

Why the fuck would we? Literally what could possibly convince people that the gov is going to arrest a million people for striking? Genuinely, how braindead are people that that is a concern?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 113 points 10 months ago (6 children)

There has never been a true, nationwide general strike in the United States, though a series of post-World War II work stoppages remembered as the “great strike wave of 1946” mobilized five million American workers demanding leaders to address economic instability and untenable working conditions.

In its aftermath, congress cracked down with the Taft-Hartley act, a legislation prohibiting a broad range of union tactics, including calling for political strikes. The 1947 law is still in place, despite repeated attempts to repeal it.

Oh, imagine that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] karashta@sopuli.xyz 101 points 10 months ago

Finally someone calling for it. Let's hope we can get it done and make it happen.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 78 points 10 months ago

Summoning people of all backgrounds to unite and take a stand against President Donald Trump’s “tyranny,” the “ultra-wealthy” and corporate greed, Johnson said, “We are going to make them pay their fair share in taxes to fund our school, to fund jobs, to fund healthcare, to fund transportation.”

“Democracy will live on because of this generation,” he proclaimed. “Are you ready to take it to the courts and to the streets?”

It was an audacious declaration from the mayor, who has risen to the top of Trump’s list of enemies as he resists the vicious immigration operations and arrival of hundreds of National Guards currently shaking Chicago.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I'm dubious that a general strike is possible in the US. All of the other countries that have had massive strikes affecting large chunks of the market were driven by large unions. Our unions don't have that sort of sway and they rarely help others to maximize their diminishing bargaining power with the ongoing degradation of workers rights. Importantly this also happens on the supply side, the consumer side will just buy it tomorrow instead usually. A day of no productivity has much bigger consequences.

That being said, I'll definitely participate.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The UAW was planning a general strike for May 1st 2028. I don't know how willing they'd be to start a wildcat general strike, but they may join one.

https://may1.uaw.org/

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What is the point if scheduling a strike so far in advance? Also, aren't UAW leadership aligned with Trump?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The point as I understand it is that they're allowing other unions to set their contract expiration to the same date, which increases the potential for pain during their next negotiations and makes for a quasi general strike across all unions who participated. It's a pretty good idea all in all.

Also, it's complicated who Sean Fain aligns with. He's pro-tariff and praised Trump for incentivizing cars to be made in the US, although it seems like that's the extent of it, and I wonder how he feels about it now that it's been fully unmasked to just be market manipulation by Trump's circle of billionaires. Sean's speech still hit most of the socialist talking points of pro labor even though it was to a bunch of Republican donors, leading to the funniest and most revealing awkward silences after sections about how the working class is who provides all of the value in an economy.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pro-tariff makes sense purely from a "protecting American labor" point of view. The ideal of them is to encourage internal markets to favor domestic production. However, that first requires domestic production to exist, and it also needs to be done in a way that doesn't harm domestic production. The Trump tariffs aren't this, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 10 months ago

What they are doing is asking all unions to set May 1st 2028 as the expiration date for their next labor contract. They aren't actually scheduling a strike, just laying the groundwork.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I fear that the average american can't afford to strike, because of the lingering threat of poverty from losing employment and getting crushed by outstanding debt. But this is a sign, that there are already not enough worker's rights.

From far away it looks like a construct.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Far too many Americans don't even get sick leave at their jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shane@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The article says that a 1947 law makes it almost impossible for unions to organize a general strike.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's preferable to break that anti-labour red scare law if it means avoiding the country getting to the point where civil war happens instead.

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 10 points 10 months ago

Most strikes were illegal by polit definitions. Teamsters got into pitched club battles with cops and mob organized strike breakers.

Had guys with guns on standby in case of escalation too.

And they won, circa 19teens.

[–] ManOMorphos@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anything that would cause real economic damage and put power back in the hands of workers will be treated as "illegal" regardless of what the books say. But what could they realistically do, arrest everyone in their homes who didn't go to work that day?

Wildcat strikes are "illegal" in the sense that your employer is allowed to retaliate with firing you or docking pay if you do so. I highly doubt someone's going to prison for not showing up at a regular job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Just corporate dictatorship things...

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 8 points 10 months ago

When the economy falls we can organize enough to strike to hit critical mass, not yet.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Untill they swear her in and while this government is shut down I'm not doing shit.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] CLOTHESPlN@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I believe a Congress women is not being sworn in since she said she would vote to release the files and the speaker of the house is blocking that. Without swearing in she is effectively unable to officially partake in votes.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Aaahhhh democracy.

[–] ManOMorphos@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I think they are referring to the US Speaker of the House refusing to swear in Adelita Grijalva after she won a special election in Arizona.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 44 points 10 months ago

It's been a hot minute since a headline made me say "whoa" out loud

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s really needed at this point

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

New event for the no kings movement. Along with taking to the streets people who normally cant make it or are to anti social can start calling out the same day.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we do the next one on a weekday?

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everyday should a be a part of the no kings movement. Week ends plus week days. Hell we got some holidays coming up. No kings day on halloween is going to be great.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

I would rather spend their days than our days

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Thanks Huff post, we need this idea to get talked about throughout the media and start gaining momentum. Even just the threat of a general strike will get a response, and any kind of work stoppages even if short of a general strike will cause enough disruption to get a response.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Finally some political leadership. Now get UAW and teamsters and longshoremen on board. The teachers and nurses. The rest will fillow

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We need to stop paying taxes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The Europeans are way ahead of the Americans in this regard.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Jesus. Since when does BuzzFeed own HuffPost?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›